Optimizing the lysis step in CTAB DNA extractions of silica-dried and herbarium leaf tissues

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
S. James Carey, L. Ellie Becklund, Paige P. Fabre, John J. Schenk
{"title":"Optimizing the lysis step in CTAB DNA extractions of silica-dried and herbarium leaf tissues","authors":"S. James Carey,&nbsp;L. Ellie Becklund,&nbsp;Paige P. Fabre,&nbsp;John J. Schenk","doi":"10.1002/aps3.11522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>The use of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is an effective and inexpensive method of extracting DNA from plants. The CTAB protocol is frequently modified to optimize DNA extractions, but experimental approaches rarely perturb a single variable at a time to systematically infer their effect on DNA quantity and quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated how chemical additives, incubation temperature, and lysis duration affected DNA quantity and quality. Altering those parameters influenced DNA concentrations and fragment lengths, but only extractant purity was significantly affected. CTAB and CTAB plus polyvinylpyrrolidone buffers produced the highest DNA quality and quantity. Extractions from silica gel–preserved tissues had significantly higher DNA yield, longer DNA fragments, and purer extractants compared to herbarium-preserved tissues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We recommend DNA extractions of silica gel–preserved tissues that include a shorter and cooler lysis step, which results in purer extractions compared to a longer and hotter lysis step, while preventing fragmentation and reducing time.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11522","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Premise

The use of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is an effective and inexpensive method of extracting DNA from plants. The CTAB protocol is frequently modified to optimize DNA extractions, but experimental approaches rarely perturb a single variable at a time to systematically infer their effect on DNA quantity and quality.

Methods and Results

We investigated how chemical additives, incubation temperature, and lysis duration affected DNA quantity and quality. Altering those parameters influenced DNA concentrations and fragment lengths, but only extractant purity was significantly affected. CTAB and CTAB plus polyvinylpyrrolidone buffers produced the highest DNA quality and quantity. Extractions from silica gel–preserved tissues had significantly higher DNA yield, longer DNA fragments, and purer extractants compared to herbarium-preserved tissues.

Conclusions

We recommend DNA extractions of silica gel–preserved tissues that include a shorter and cooler lysis step, which results in purer extractions compared to a longer and hotter lysis step, while preventing fragmentation and reducing time.

Abstract Image

优化硅干和植物标本叶组织CTAB DNA提取的裂解步骤
十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB)是一种有效且廉价的植物DNA提取方法。CTAB方案经常被修改以优化DNA提取,但实验方法很少一次干扰单个变量来系统地推断它们对DNA数量和质量的影响。方法结果研究了化学添加剂、孵育温度和裂解时间对DNA数量和质量的影响。改变这些参数会影响DNA浓度和片段长度,但只有萃取剂纯度受到显著影响。CTAB和CTAB加聚乙烯吡咯烷酮缓冲液产生的DNA质量和数量最高。与植物标本保存的组织相比,从硅胶保存的组织中提取的DNA产量明显更高,DNA片段更长,提取物纯度更高。结论:我们推荐使用较短且较冷的裂解步骤提取硅胶保存组织的DNA,与较长且较热的裂解步骤相比,这可以获得更纯净的提取,同时可以防止断裂并减少时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信