Measurement of Self-regulation in Preschool and Elementary Children: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Kelsey Philpott-Robinson, Tennille Johnson, Leah Evans, Kylie Wales, Carl Leonard, Alison E Lane
{"title":"Measurement of Self-regulation in Preschool and Elementary Children: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kelsey Philpott-Robinson,&nbsp;Tennille Johnson,&nbsp;Leah Evans,&nbsp;Kylie Wales,&nbsp;Carl Leonard,&nbsp;Alison E Lane","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2022.2158055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This scoping review sought to identify and characterize measurement of self-regulation in preschool and elementary aged children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review (ScR) guidelines were applied. Databases from the fields of allied health, education, medicine, and social sciences were searched including: CINAHL, Education Database (ProQuest), Education Research Complete, EMBASE, ERIC, iNFORMIT Combined, Medline, PsychINFO, Social Sciences (ProQuest), Teacher Reference Center, and Web of Science. Articles published between 2015 and 2020 were included. Dual review was utilized at all stages and a third reviewer resolved any conflicts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven studies were included in this review. A range of observational, self-report, teacher report, caregiver report, and observational measures of self-regulation were identified. Included studies were primarily published in education and psychology disciplines, with no studies by occupational therapists identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although a range of measures were identified in this scoping review, the results highlight the lack of consensus regarding self-regulation measurement that occupational therapists use to design and implement therapy programs to address child emotional and behavioral needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":"43 4","pages":"403-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2158055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: This scoping review sought to identify and characterize measurement of self-regulation in preschool and elementary aged children.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review (ScR) guidelines were applied. Databases from the fields of allied health, education, medicine, and social sciences were searched including: CINAHL, Education Database (ProQuest), Education Research Complete, EMBASE, ERIC, iNFORMIT Combined, Medline, PsychINFO, Social Sciences (ProQuest), Teacher Reference Center, and Web of Science. Articles published between 2015 and 2020 were included. Dual review was utilized at all stages and a third reviewer resolved any conflicts.

Results: Sixty-seven studies were included in this review. A range of observational, self-report, teacher report, caregiver report, and observational measures of self-regulation were identified. Included studies were primarily published in education and psychology disciplines, with no studies by occupational therapists identified.

Conclusions: Although a range of measures were identified in this scoping review, the results highlight the lack of consensus regarding self-regulation measurement that occupational therapists use to design and implement therapy programs to address child emotional and behavioral needs.

学前和小学儿童自我调节的测量:一个范围综述。
目的:本综述旨在识别和表征学前和小学年龄儿童自我调节的测量。方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析-范围评价(ScR)指南的首选报告项目。检索了来自联合健康、教育、医学和社会科学领域的数据库,包括:CINAHL、教育数据库(ProQuest)、教育研究完整、EMBASE、ERIC、iNFORMIT Combined、Medline、PsychINFO、社会科学(ProQuest)、教师参考中心和Web of Science。文章发表于2015年至2020年。在所有阶段都采用了双重审查,第三次审查解决了任何冲突。结果:本综述纳入了67项研究。一系列观察性、自我报告、教师报告、照顾者报告和自我调节的观察性措施被确定。纳入的研究主要发表在教育和心理学学科上,没有职业治疗师的研究。结论:尽管在此范围审查中确定了一系列措施,但结果强调了在职业治疗师用于设计和实施治疗方案以解决儿童情感和行为需求的自我调节测量方面缺乏共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信