Procedural learning and retention relative to explicit learning and retention in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using a modification of the trail making test.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Cierra M Keith, William T McCuddy, Katharine Lindberg, Liv E Miller, Kirk Bryant, Rashi I Mehta, Kirk Wilhelmsen, Mark Miller, R Osvaldo Navia, Melanie Ward, Gerard Deib, Pierre-François D'Haese, Marc W Haut
{"title":"Procedural learning and retention relative to explicit learning and retention in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using a modification of the trail making test.","authors":"Cierra M Keith,&nbsp;William T McCuddy,&nbsp;Katharine Lindberg,&nbsp;Liv E Miller,&nbsp;Kirk Bryant,&nbsp;Rashi I Mehta,&nbsp;Kirk Wilhelmsen,&nbsp;Mark Miller,&nbsp;R Osvaldo Navia,&nbsp;Melanie Ward,&nbsp;Gerard Deib,&nbsp;Pierre-François D'Haese,&nbsp;Marc W Haut","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2022.2077297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia are characterized by pathological changes to the medial temporal lobes, resulting in explicit learning and retention reductions. Studies demonstrate that implicit/procedural memory processes are relatively intact in these populations, supporting different anatomical substrates for differing memory systems. This study examined differences between explicit and procedural learning and retention in individuals with aMCI and AD dementia relative to matched healthy controls. We also examined anatomical substrates using volumetric MRI. Results revealed expected difficulties with explicit learning and retention in individuals with aMCI and AD with relatively preserved procedural memory. Explicit verbal retention was associated with medial temporal cortex volumes. However, procedural retention was not related to medial temporal or basal ganglia volumes. Overall, this study confirms the dissociation between explicit relative to procedural learning and retention in aMCI and AD dementia and supports differing anatomical substrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2022.2077297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia are characterized by pathological changes to the medial temporal lobes, resulting in explicit learning and retention reductions. Studies demonstrate that implicit/procedural memory processes are relatively intact in these populations, supporting different anatomical substrates for differing memory systems. This study examined differences between explicit and procedural learning and retention in individuals with aMCI and AD dementia relative to matched healthy controls. We also examined anatomical substrates using volumetric MRI. Results revealed expected difficulties with explicit learning and retention in individuals with aMCI and AD with relatively preserved procedural memory. Explicit verbal retention was associated with medial temporal cortex volumes. However, procedural retention was not related to medial temporal or basal ganglia volumes. Overall, this study confirms the dissociation between explicit relative to procedural learning and retention in aMCI and AD dementia and supports differing anatomical substrates.

程序性学习和保留相对于显性学习和保留在轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中使用修改的轨迹测试。
遗忘性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆的特征是内侧颞叶的病理改变,导致显性学习和记忆减少。研究表明,内隐/程序性记忆过程在这些种群中相对完整,支持不同记忆系统的不同解剖基础。本研究考察了aMCI和AD痴呆患者相对于匹配的健康对照的外显性和程序性学习和保留的差异。我们还使用体积MRI检查了解剖基底。结果显示,在程序性记忆相对保留的aMCI和AD患者中,外显学习和保留存在预期的困难。外显语言保留与内侧颞叶皮质体积有关。然而,程序性保留与内侧颞节或基底节体积无关。总的来说,本研究证实了aMCI和AD痴呆中显性相对程序性学习和保留之间的分离,并支持了不同的解剖学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信