{"title":"Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed.","authors":"Chunliang Wang, Shih-Jung Liu, Chung-Hsun Chang","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"12 8","pages":"504-511"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/fa/BJR-12-2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1.PMC10444534.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model.
Methods: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis.
Results: This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option.
Conclusion: Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study.
目的:探讨猪跟结节撕脱骨折不同碎片厚度的最佳固定方法。方法:将36只猪跟骨锯切成3种不同碎片厚度(5、10、15 mm)的单纯性撕脱骨折。随机用两个缝合锚或一个无头螺钉固定。进行了载荷-失效和循环载荷张力试验进行生物力学分析。结果:这项生物力学研究预测,如果碎片厚度超过15 mm,与缝合锚钉固定相比,无头螺钉固定是更好的选择(无头螺钉:432.55 N (SD 62.25);缝合锚:446.58 N (SD 84.97)),循环加载后骨折碎片位移较小(无头螺钉:3.94 N (SD 1.76);缝合锚:8.68 N (SD 1.84))。考虑到碎片厚度小于10mm,缝合锚定固定是更安全的选择。结论:根据本研究的回归模型,骨折碎片厚度有助于决定采用无头螺钉或缝合锚定固定治疗跟结节撕脱性骨折。