Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Chunliang Wang, Shih-Jung Liu, Chung-Hsun Chang
{"title":"Thickness of simple calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures influences the optimal fixation method employed.","authors":"Chunliang Wang,&nbsp;Shih-Jung Liu,&nbsp;Chung-Hsun Chang","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/fa/BJR-12-2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1.PMC10444534.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.128.BJR-2023-0060.R1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to establish the optimal fixation methods for calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with different fragment thicknesses in a porcine model.

Methods: A total of 36 porcine calcanea were sawed to create simple avulsion fractures with three different fragment thicknesses (5, 10, and 15 mm). They were randomly fixed with either two suture anchors or one headless screw. Load-to-failure and cyclic loading tension tests were performed for the biomechanical analysis.

Results: This biomechanical study predicts that headless screw fixation is a better option if fragment thickness is over 15 mm in terms of the comparable peak failure load to suture anchor fixation (headless screw: 432.55 N (SD 62.25); suture anchor: 446.58 N (SD 84.97)), and less fracture fragment displacement after cyclic loading (headless screw: 3.94 N (SD 1.76); suture anchor: 8.68 N (SD 1.84)). Given that the fragment thickness is less than 10 mm, suture anchor fixation is a safer option.

Conclusion: Fracture fragment thickness helps in making the decision of either using headless screw or suture anchor fixation in treating calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture, based on the regression models of our study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单纯性跟骨结节撕脱骨折的厚度影响最佳固定方法的选择。
目的:探讨猪跟结节撕脱骨折不同碎片厚度的最佳固定方法。方法:将36只猪跟骨锯切成3种不同碎片厚度(5、10、15 mm)的单纯性撕脱骨折。随机用两个缝合锚或一个无头螺钉固定。进行了载荷-失效和循环载荷张力试验进行生物力学分析。结果:这项生物力学研究预测,如果碎片厚度超过15 mm,与缝合锚钉固定相比,无头螺钉固定是更好的选择(无头螺钉:432.55 N (SD 62.25);缝合锚:446.58 N (SD 84.97)),循环加载后骨折碎片位移较小(无头螺钉:3.94 N (SD 1.76);缝合锚:8.68 N (SD 1.84))。考虑到碎片厚度小于10mm,缝合锚定固定是更安全的选择。结论:根据本研究的回归模型,骨折碎片厚度有助于决定采用无头螺钉或缝合锚定固定治疗跟结节撕脱性骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信