Money Matters: Time for Prevention and Early Intervention to Address Family Economic Circumstances.

Nick Axford, Vashti Berry
{"title":"Money Matters: Time for Prevention and Early Intervention to Address Family Economic Circumstances.","authors":"Nick Axford,&nbsp;Vashti Berry","doi":"10.1007/s10935-022-00717-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child poverty is associated with poorer physical and mental health, negative educational outcomes and adverse long-term social and psychological consequences, all of which impact on service demand and expenditure. Until now, however, prevention and early intervention practice has tended to focus on enhancing inter-parental relationships and parenting skills (e.g., via relationship skills education, home visiting, parenting programs, family therapy) or child language, social-emotional and life skills (e.g., early childhood education, school-based programs, youth mentoring). Programs often target low-income neighborhoods or families but rarely address poverty directly. While there is substantial evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions in improving child outcomes, null results are not uncommon and even positive effects are often small, short-term, and difficult to replicate. One avenue to enhance intervention effectiveness is to improve families' economic circumstances. There are several arguments for this refocusing. It is arguably unethical to focus on individual risk without acknowledging or seeking to address (where relevant) families' social and economic contexts, while the stigma and material constraints associated with poverty can make it harder for families to engage with psychosocial support. There is also evidence that increasing household income improves child outcomes. Although national policies to alleviate poverty are important, it is increasingly recognized that practice-based initiatives have a role to play (e.g., income maximization, devolved budgets, money management support). However, knowledge about their implementation and effectiveness is relatively thin. For instance, there is some evidence that co-located welfare rights advice in healthcare settings can improve recipients' financial circumstances and health, but it is mixed and of limited quality. Moreover, there is little rigorous research on whether and how such services affect mediators (parent-child interactions, parenting capacity) and/or child physical and psychosocial outcomes directly. We call for prevention and early intervention programs to attend more to families' economic circumstances, and for experimental studies to test their implementation, reach and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":"44 3","pages":"267-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10009842/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-022-00717-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Child poverty is associated with poorer physical and mental health, negative educational outcomes and adverse long-term social and psychological consequences, all of which impact on service demand and expenditure. Until now, however, prevention and early intervention practice has tended to focus on enhancing inter-parental relationships and parenting skills (e.g., via relationship skills education, home visiting, parenting programs, family therapy) or child language, social-emotional and life skills (e.g., early childhood education, school-based programs, youth mentoring). Programs often target low-income neighborhoods or families but rarely address poverty directly. While there is substantial evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions in improving child outcomes, null results are not uncommon and even positive effects are often small, short-term, and difficult to replicate. One avenue to enhance intervention effectiveness is to improve families' economic circumstances. There are several arguments for this refocusing. It is arguably unethical to focus on individual risk without acknowledging or seeking to address (where relevant) families' social and economic contexts, while the stigma and material constraints associated with poverty can make it harder for families to engage with psychosocial support. There is also evidence that increasing household income improves child outcomes. Although national policies to alleviate poverty are important, it is increasingly recognized that practice-based initiatives have a role to play (e.g., income maximization, devolved budgets, money management support). However, knowledge about their implementation and effectiveness is relatively thin. For instance, there is some evidence that co-located welfare rights advice in healthcare settings can improve recipients' financial circumstances and health, but it is mixed and of limited quality. Moreover, there is little rigorous research on whether and how such services affect mediators (parent-child interactions, parenting capacity) and/or child physical and psychosocial outcomes directly. We call for prevention and early intervention programs to attend more to families' economic circumstances, and for experimental studies to test their implementation, reach and effectiveness.

Abstract Image

金钱问题:是时候预防和早期干预以解决家庭经济状况。
儿童贫穷与较差的身心健康、消极的教育成果以及不利的长期社会和心理后果有关,所有这些都影响到服务需求和支出。然而,到目前为止,预防和早期干预实践往往侧重于加强父母之间的关系和育儿技能(例如,通过关系技能教育、家访、育儿计划、家庭治疗)或儿童语言、社会情感和生活技能(例如,幼儿教育、校本计划、青年辅导)。项目通常针对低收入社区或家庭,但很少直接解决贫困问题。虽然有大量证据表明此类干预措施在改善儿童结局方面的有效性,但无效结果并不罕见,即使是积极效果也往往很小,短期且难以复制。提高干预效果的一个途径是改善家庭的经济状况。有几个理由支持这种重新聚焦。关注个人风险而不承认或寻求解决(在相关情况下)家庭的社会和经济背景,可以说是不道德的,而与贫困相关的耻辱和物质限制可能使家庭更难获得社会心理支持。还有证据表明,增加家庭收入可以改善儿童的发展。虽然减轻贫穷的国家政策很重要,但人们日益认识到,以实践为基础的倡议可以发挥作用(例如,尽量增加收入、下放预算、资金管理支助)。然而,关于它们的实施和有效性的知识相对较少。例如,有一些证据表明,在医疗保健机构提供同地福利权利咨询可以改善受助者的财务状况和健康,但这种建议好坏参半,质量有限。此外,很少有关于这些服务是否以及如何直接影响调解者(亲子互动、养育能力)和/或儿童身体和心理社会结果的严谨研究。我们呼吁预防和早期干预计划更多地关注家庭的经济状况,并进行实验研究,以测试其实施、覆盖范围和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信