Predicting metalwork following posterior fixation of thoracolumbar fractures.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2023.2249550
See Yung Phang, Cullen McCulloch, Christopher Barrett
{"title":"Predicting metalwork following posterior fixation of thoracolumbar fractures.","authors":"See Yung Phang, Cullen McCulloch, Christopher Barrett","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2249550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surgical fusion through posterior instrumentation and pedicle screw placement is a long established method for stabilising traumatic spinal fractures. Post-surgical complications include infection and metal work failure, the most common aetiology of which is pedicle screw fracture. Metal work failure rates vary from 15% to 60%. Research relating to factors which predict metal work failure in post-traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fixation is lacking. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for metalwork failure in patients who had posterior fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted by interrogating the hospital database for neurosurgical post-traumatic thoracolumbar fixation cases between 2015 and 2018 with at least 2 years follow up. Data was collected through electronic medical notes and PACS. Nineteen different patient factors (gender, age, mechanism of injury, presence of concomitant injury spinal or extra-spinal injury, pedicle cross-sectional area, pedicle cancellous bone density, pedicle total bone density, vertebral body bone density, erector spinae muscle density and lumbar spine subcutaneous fat thickness, Charlson comorbidity index, fracture location, surgical approach, long/short segment fixation, whether decompression was done, whether the index level was fixed, and presence of wound infection) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 92 patients with 97 operations, and 9 cases of metal work failure. Two factors were statistically significantly associated with metal work failure: Post-operative wound infection (<i>p</i> = 0.029) and lumbar spine fat thickness (<i>p</i> = 0.024). The relative risk calculated in patients with a wound infection was 3.76. Lumbar spine fat thickness was on average 11.9 mm greater than patients not experiencing metal work failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has identified two factors associated with increased rates of metal work failure: Post-operative wound infection and lumbar spine fat thickness. When assessing surgical candidates these factors may be incorporated into surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"326-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2249550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Surgical fusion through posterior instrumentation and pedicle screw placement is a long established method for stabilising traumatic spinal fractures. Post-surgical complications include infection and metal work failure, the most common aetiology of which is pedicle screw fracture. Metal work failure rates vary from 15% to 60%. Research relating to factors which predict metal work failure in post-traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fixation is lacking. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for metalwork failure in patients who had posterior fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted by interrogating the hospital database for neurosurgical post-traumatic thoracolumbar fixation cases between 2015 and 2018 with at least 2 years follow up. Data was collected through electronic medical notes and PACS. Nineteen different patient factors (gender, age, mechanism of injury, presence of concomitant injury spinal or extra-spinal injury, pedicle cross-sectional area, pedicle cancellous bone density, pedicle total bone density, vertebral body bone density, erector spinae muscle density and lumbar spine subcutaneous fat thickness, Charlson comorbidity index, fracture location, surgical approach, long/short segment fixation, whether decompression was done, whether the index level was fixed, and presence of wound infection) were compared.

Results: We identified 92 patients with 97 operations, and 9 cases of metal work failure. Two factors were statistically significantly associated with metal work failure: Post-operative wound infection (p = 0.029) and lumbar spine fat thickness (p = 0.024). The relative risk calculated in patients with a wound infection was 3.76. Lumbar spine fat thickness was on average 11.9 mm greater than patients not experiencing metal work failure.

Conclusions: This study has identified two factors associated with increased rates of metal work failure: Post-operative wound infection and lumbar spine fat thickness. When assessing surgical candidates these factors may be incorporated into surgical planning.

预测胸腰椎骨折后路固定后的金属加工。
目的:通过后路内固定和椎弓根螺钉置入手术融合是一种长期建立的稳定外伤性脊柱骨折的方法。术后并发症包括感染和金属工作失败,最常见的原因是椎弓根螺钉骨折。金属加工失败率从15%到60%不等。关于创伤后胸腰椎固定金属工作失败的预测因素的研究是缺乏的。本研究旨在确定创伤性胸腰椎骨折后路固定患者金属制品失效的潜在危险因素。方法:通过查询2015 - 2018年神经外科创伤后胸腰椎内固定病例的医院数据库,进行回顾性队列分析,随访至少2年。通过电子病历和PACS收集数据。19种不同的患者因素(性别、年龄、损伤机制、是否存在脊柱或脊柱外损伤、椎弓根截面积、椎弓根松质骨密度、椎弓根总骨密度、椎体骨密度、竖脊肌密度和腰椎皮下脂肪厚度、Charlson合并症指数、骨折位置、手术入路、长/短节段固定、是否减压、指数水平是否固定、与伤口感染发生率比较。结果:92例患者共97例手术,9例金属加工失败。术后伤口感染(p = 0.029)和腰椎脂肪厚度(p = 0.024)与金属工作失败有统计学意义。伤口感染患者的相对危险度为3.76。腰椎脂肪厚度比未经历金属加工失败的患者平均大11.9 mm。结论:本研究确定了与金属手术失败率增加相关的两个因素:术后伤口感染和腰椎脂肪厚度。在评估手术候选人时,这些因素可纳入手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信