A Structured Discharge Education Intervention for Parents of Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Oncology Patients.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Wendy Landier, Jocelyn M York, Aman Wadhwa, Kandice Adams, Harrison M Henneberg, Avi Madan-Swain, Beth Benton, Valencia Slater, Sue Zupanec, Jeneane Miller, Kathryn Tomlinson, Joshua S Richman, Smita Bhatia
{"title":"A Structured Discharge Education Intervention for Parents of Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Oncology Patients.","authors":"Wendy Landier,&nbsp;Jocelyn M York,&nbsp;Aman Wadhwa,&nbsp;Kandice Adams,&nbsp;Harrison M Henneberg,&nbsp;Avi Madan-Swain,&nbsp;Beth Benton,&nbsp;Valencia Slater,&nbsp;Sue Zupanec,&nbsp;Jeneane Miller,&nbsp;Kathryn Tomlinson,&nbsp;Joshua S Richman,&nbsp;Smita Bhatia","doi":"10.1177/27527530221140058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer require specialized knowledge and skills in order to safely care for their children at home. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) developed expert consensus recommendations to guide new diagnosis education; however, these recommendations have not been empirically tested. <b>Methods:</b> We used a sequential two-cohort study design to test a nurse-led Structured Discharge Teaching Intervention (SDTI) that operationalizes the COG expert recommendations in the setting of a tertiary children's hospital. Outcomes included parent Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS); Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS); Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty (PDCD); Nurse Satisfaction; and post-discharge unplanned healthcare utilization. <b>Results:</b> The process for discharge education changed significantly before and after implementation of the SDTI, with significantly fewer instances of one-day discharge teaching, and higher involvement of staff nurses in teaching. Overall, parental RHDS, QDTS, and PDCD scores were similar in the unintervened and intervened cohorts. Almost 60% of patients had unplanned healthcare encounters during the first 30 days following their initial hospital discharge. Overall nurse satisfaction with the quality and process of discharge education significantly increased post-intervention. <b>Discussion:</b> Although the structure for and process of delivering discharge education changed significantly with implementation of the SDTI, parent RHDS and QDTS scores remained uniformly high and PDCD scores and non-preventable unplanned healthcare utilization remained similar, while nurse satisfaction with the quality and process of discharge education significantly improved, suggesting that further testing of the SDTI across diverse pediatric oncology settings is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530221140058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer require specialized knowledge and skills in order to safely care for their children at home. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) developed expert consensus recommendations to guide new diagnosis education; however, these recommendations have not been empirically tested. Methods: We used a sequential two-cohort study design to test a nurse-led Structured Discharge Teaching Intervention (SDTI) that operationalizes the COG expert recommendations in the setting of a tertiary children's hospital. Outcomes included parent Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS); Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS); Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty (PDCD); Nurse Satisfaction; and post-discharge unplanned healthcare utilization. Results: The process for discharge education changed significantly before and after implementation of the SDTI, with significantly fewer instances of one-day discharge teaching, and higher involvement of staff nurses in teaching. Overall, parental RHDS, QDTS, and PDCD scores were similar in the unintervened and intervened cohorts. Almost 60% of patients had unplanned healthcare encounters during the first 30 days following their initial hospital discharge. Overall nurse satisfaction with the quality and process of discharge education significantly increased post-intervention. Discussion: Although the structure for and process of delivering discharge education changed significantly with implementation of the SDTI, parent RHDS and QDTS scores remained uniformly high and PDCD scores and non-preventable unplanned healthcare utilization remained similar, while nurse satisfaction with the quality and process of discharge education significantly improved, suggesting that further testing of the SDTI across diverse pediatric oncology settings is warranted.

对初诊儿科肿瘤患者家长的结构化出院教育干预。
背景:新诊断为癌症的儿童的父母需要专门的知识和技能,以便在家中安全地照顾他们的孩子。儿童肿瘤小组(COG)制定了专家共识建议,以指导新的诊断教育;然而,这些建议还没有经过实证检验。方法:我们采用顺序双队列研究设计来测试护士主导的结构化出院教学干预(SDTI),该干预在三级儿童医院的设置中实施COG专家建议。结果包括家长出院准备程度量表(RHDS);出院教学量表(QDTS)的质量出院后应对困难(PDCD);护士满意度;以及出院后计划外的医疗保健利用。结果:实施SDTI前后,出院教育流程发生了显著变化,一天出院教学明显减少,护理人员对出院教学的参与度更高。总体而言,父母RHDS、QDTS和PDCD评分在未干预组和干预组中相似。近60%的患者在首次出院后的前30天内遇到了计划外的医疗保健。干预后护士对出院教育的质量和流程的总体满意度显著提高。讨论:尽管随着SDTI的实施,提供出院教育的结构和过程发生了显著变化,但家长RHDS和QDTS得分保持一致的高水平,PDCD得分和非可预防的计划外医疗保健利用保持相似,而护士对出院教育的质量和过程的满意度显著提高,这表明有必要在不同的儿科肿瘤学环境中进一步测试SDTI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信