Evaluation of the Uniform Data Set version 3 teleneuropsychological measures.

IF 2.6 4区心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-27 DOI:10.1017/S1355617723000383

Theresa F Gierzynski, Allyson Gregoire, Jonathan M Reader, Rebecca Pantis, Stephen Campbell, Arijit Bhaumik, Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Judith Heidebrink, Bruno Giordani, Henry Paulson, Benjamin M Hampstead

{"title":"Evaluation of the Uniform Data Set version 3 teleneuropsychological measures.","authors":"Theresa F Gierzynski, Allyson Gregoire, Jonathan M Reader, Rebecca Pantis, Stephen Campbell, Arijit Bhaumik, Annalise Rahman-Filipiak, Judith Heidebrink, Bruno Giordani, Henry Paulson, Benjamin M Hampstead","doi":"10.1017/S1355617723000383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Few studies have evaluated in-home teleneuropsychological (teleNP) assessment and none, to our knowledge, has evaluated the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC) Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog). The current study evaluates the reliability of the in-home UDS v3.0 t-cog with a prior in-person UDS v3.0 evaluation.Method: One hundred and eighty-one cognitively unimpaired or cognitively impaired participants from a longitudinal study of memory and aging completed an in-person UDS v3.0 and a subsequent UDS v3.0 t-cog evaluation (∼16 months apart) administered either via video conference (n = 122) or telephone (n = 59).Results: We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between each time point for the entire sample. ICCs ranged widely (0.01-0.79) but were generally indicative of \"moderate\" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.5-0.75) to \"good\" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.75-0.90) agreement. Comparable ICCs were evident when looking only at those with stable diagnoses. However, relatively stronger ICCs (Range: 0.35-0.87) were found between similarly timed in-person UDS v3.0 evaluations.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most tests on the UDS v3.0 t-cog battery may serve as a viable alternative to its in-person counterpart, though reliability may be attenuated relative to the traditional in-person format. More tightly controlled studies are needed to better establish the reliability of these measures.","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have evaluated in-home teleneuropsychological (teleNP) assessment and none, to our knowledge, has evaluated the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC) Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog). The current study evaluates the reliability of the in-home UDS v3.0 t-cog with a prior in-person UDS v3.0 evaluation.

Method: One hundred and eighty-one cognitively unimpaired or cognitively impaired participants from a longitudinal study of memory and aging completed an in-person UDS v3.0 and a subsequent UDS v3.0 t-cog evaluation (∼16 months apart) administered either via video conference (n = 122) or telephone (n = 59).

Results: We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between each time point for the entire sample. ICCs ranged widely (0.01-0.79) but were generally indicative of "moderate" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.5-0.75) to "good" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.75-0.90) agreement. Comparable ICCs were evident when looking only at those with stable diagnoses. However, relatively stronger ICCs (Range: 0.35-0.87) were found between similarly timed in-person UDS v3.0 evaluations.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most tests on the UDS v3.0 t-cog battery may serve as a viable alternative to its in-person counterpart, though reliability may be attenuated relative to the traditional in-person format. More tightly controlled studies are needed to better establish the reliability of these measures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

统一数据集第 3 版远程神经心理学测量评估。

目的：很少有研究对居家远程神经心理学（teleNP）评估进行过评估，据我们所知，没有一项研究对美国国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心（NACC）的统一数据集第三版远程适配测试套件（UDS v3.0 t-cog）进行过评估。目前的研究评估了上门 UDS v3.0 t-cog 与之前的上门 UDS v3.0 评估的可靠性：方法：在一项记忆与衰老纵向研究中，181 名认知能力未受损或认知能力受损的参与者通过视频会议（122 人）或电话（59 人）完成了一次上门 UDS v3.0 评估和随后的 UDS v3.0 t-cog 评估（相隔 16 个月）：我们计算了所有样本每个时间点之间的类内相关系数（ICC）。ICCs 的范围很广（0.01-0.79），但一般显示出 "中等"（即 ICCs 在 0.5-0.75 之间）到 "良好"（即 ICCs 在 0.75-0.90 之间）的一致性。如果只观察诊断结果稳定的患者，ICCs 的一致性可与之媲美。然而，在时间相近的 UDS v3.0 当面评估中发现了相对更强的 ICCs（范围：0.35-0.87）：我们的研究结果表明，UDS v3.0 t-cog 电池组中的大多数测试可作为面对面测试的可行替代方案，但相对于传统的面对面形式，可靠性可能会有所降低。要更好地确定这些测试的可靠性，还需要进行更严格的控制研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

3.80%

发文量

185

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.