Effects of CT-based attenuation correction on quantitative SPECT/CT of jawbone.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tatsuya Tsuchitani, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Rika Yoshida, Hayato Kiada, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Tetsuya Minami, Noriko Kotura
{"title":"Effects of CT-based attenuation correction on quantitative SPECT/CT of jawbone.","authors":"Tatsuya Tsuchitani,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Kitajima,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Takahashi,&nbsp;Rika Yoshida,&nbsp;Hayato Kiada,&nbsp;Masakatsu Tsurusaki,&nbsp;Tetsuya Minami,&nbsp;Noriko Kotura","doi":"10.1967/s002449912573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) quantitative examinations, CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) is considered necessary, though its effect on the quantitative values of an examined area close to the body surface, such as the jawbone, has not been elucidated. We performed an investigation to determine whether quantitative evaluation using a bone SPECT standalone device without CT is possible.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The calculated indices were maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVpeak. Grouping was performed based on the presence or absence of CTAC. The CTAC group underwent CTAC, while the noAC group did not.Validation was performed using clinical data of patients who underwent a jawbone SPECT/CT examination. Becquerel calibration factor (BCF) is required for calculation of SUV, and was determined with values obtained with both phantom and syringe methods. The index for the uptake areas in each group was assessed using a paired t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using BCF obtained with the phantom method, both SUVmax and SUVpeak were higher in the noAC group. In contrast, BCF obtained with the syringe method showed no significant difference between the CTAC and noAC groups in regard to SUVmax and SUVpeak. This tendency was found regardless of the device used. Also, a high correlation was observed between the groups for both devices (r=0.95 and 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that BCF obtained with a syringe method should be used when performing quantitative evaluation without CTAC. They also indicate that quantitative evaluation using a SPECT standalone device may be possible for jawbone SPECT/CT examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12871,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"108-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) quantitative examinations, CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) is considered necessary, though its effect on the quantitative values of an examined area close to the body surface, such as the jawbone, has not been elucidated. We performed an investigation to determine whether quantitative evaluation using a bone SPECT standalone device without CT is possible.

Subjects and methods: The calculated indices were maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVpeak. Grouping was performed based on the presence or absence of CTAC. The CTAC group underwent CTAC, while the noAC group did not.Validation was performed using clinical data of patients who underwent a jawbone SPECT/CT examination. Becquerel calibration factor (BCF) is required for calculation of SUV, and was determined with values obtained with both phantom and syringe methods. The index for the uptake areas in each group was assessed using a paired t-test.

Results: Using BCF obtained with the phantom method, both SUVmax and SUVpeak were higher in the noAC group. In contrast, BCF obtained with the syringe method showed no significant difference between the CTAC and noAC groups in regard to SUVmax and SUVpeak. This tendency was found regardless of the device used. Also, a high correlation was observed between the groups for both devices (r=0.95 and 0.93).

Conclusion: Our findings show that BCF obtained with a syringe method should be used when performing quantitative evaluation without CTAC. They also indicate that quantitative evaluation using a SPECT standalone device may be possible for jawbone SPECT/CT examinations.

基于CT的衰减校正对颌骨SPECT/CT定量的影响。
目的:对于单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)/计算机断层摄影(CT)定量检查,基于CT的衰减校正(CTAC)被认为是必要的,尽管它对靠近体表的检查区域(如颚骨)的定量值的影响尚未阐明。我们进行了一项研究,以确定是否可以在没有CT的情况下使用骨SPECT独立设备进行定量评估。受试者和方法:计算的指标为最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)和SUVpeak。根据是否存在CTAC进行分组。CTAC组接受了CTAC,而noAC组没有。使用接受颚骨SPECT/CT检查的患者的临床数据进行验证。SUV的计算需要贝克勒尔校准系数(BCF),该系数是用体模和注射器方法获得的值确定的。使用配对t检验评估各组摄取面积指数。结果:使用体模法获得的BCF,noAC组的SUVmax和SUVpeak均较高。相反,用注射器法获得的BCF在CTAC组和noAC组之间的SUVmax和SUVpeak方面没有显示出显著差异。无论使用何种设备,都会发现这种趋势。此外,两组装置之间的相关性很高(r=0.95和0.93)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在不使用CTAC的情况下进行定量评估时,应使用注射器法获得的BCF。他们还表明,使用SPECT独立设备的定量评估可能用于颌骨SPECT/CT检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine published by the Hellenic Society of Nuclear Medicine in Thessaloniki, aims to contribute to research, to education and cover the scientific and professional interests of physicians, in the field of nuclear medicine and in medicine in general. The journal may publish papers of nuclear medicine and also papers that refer to related subjects as dosimetry, computer science, targeting of gene expression, radioimmunoassay, radiation protection, biology, cell trafficking, related historical brief reviews and other related subjects. Original papers are preferred. The journal may after special agreement publish supplements covering important subjects, dully reviewed and subscripted separately.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信