Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis.

Q2 Dentistry
Ricardo Guimarães Neves, Priscilla Cardoso Lazari-Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, Alexandre Leite Carvalho, João Batista de Souza, Érica Miranda Torres
{"title":"Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis.","authors":"Ricardo Guimarães Neves,&nbsp;Priscilla Cardoso Lazari-Carvalho,&nbsp;Marco Aurélio Carvalho,&nbsp;Alexandre Leite Carvalho,&nbsp;João Batista de Souza,&nbsp;Érica Miranda Torres","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS - 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) - bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) - implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":"27 4","pages":"392-398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10431233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss.

Materials and methods: A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS - 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) - bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) - implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components.

Results: Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components.

Conclusions: The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

插座屏蔽技术:应力分布分析。
背景:通过有限元分析,与其他用于治疗牙齿缺失的技术相比,分析承窝护罩(SS)技术在种植体周围骨组织、种植体和假体组件中引起的应力分布。材料与方法:建立种植体支撑上中切牙牙冠的三维模型,模拟三种不同的放置条件:SS-2.0mm厚的根牙本质碎片位于牙槽颊壁和种植体之间;异种骨移植物(HBG)-定位于牙槽颊壁和植入物的牛骨移植物;对照组(C)-植入物完全放置在愈合肺泡的骨组织中。该模型仅限于骨组织的侧表面,并模拟了以下载荷:同时施加牙冠舌侧表面100N(最大习惯性咬合)和牙冠切缘25.5N(下颌前突期间牙齿接触)的倾斜(45°)载荷。分析了皮质骨、小梁骨、牙本质根碎片和骨移植物的拉伸应力、剪切应力、压缩和位移;而在植入物和假体部件中量化等效的von Mises应力。结果:骨组织中SS和HBG的应力值高于C,而牙本质根碎片、骨移植物、植入物和假体组件在模型内略有差异。结论:SS技术在种植体周围组织中表现出最高的应力集中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信