Evaluation of endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasound and baseline risk factors as a predictor for endometrial abnormalities in postmenopausal women

Q3 Medicine
Jyothirmayi Yerrisani, Anoushka Kothari, Kelly Collins, Emma Ballard, Alka Kothari
{"title":"Evaluation of endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasound and baseline risk factors as a predictor for endometrial abnormalities in postmenopausal women","authors":"Jyothirmayi Yerrisani,&nbsp;Anoushka Kothari,&nbsp;Kelly Collins,&nbsp;Emma Ballard,&nbsp;Alka Kothari","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the endometrial thickness (ET) as a predictor of endometrial abnormalities in postmenopausal women and whether consideration of baseline risk factors increases diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a retrospective observational study of postmenopausal women presenting with bleeding or thickened endometrium (≥4 mm) on ultrasound, between 2003 and 2012. Risk factors for endometrial abnormality were analysed using logistic regression. Of 301 women, 220 were symptomatic and 81 were asymptomatic. The median ET was 6 mm (IQR 4–9) for symptomatic women and 9 mm (IQR 6–12) for asymptomatic women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Abnormal pathology was found in 35 symptomatic (15.9%) and 6 asymptomatic women (7.4%). For each 1 mm increase in ET, the odds of an abnormal diagnosis increased by 16.3% (95% CI 9.6–23.5) for symptomatic and 19.9% (95% CI 3.1–39.3) for asymptomatic women. The Youden's index method identified an ET threshold of ≥7.1mm for symptomatic and ≥14.5mm for asymptomatic women. In symptomatic women the sensitivity was 88.6% (95% CI 72.3–96.3) and specificity 69.2% (95% CI 61.9–75.6), while in asymptomatic women the sensitivity was 50.0% (95% CI 13.9–86.1) and specificity was 89.3% (95% CI 79.5–95.0). The addition of age in the symptomatic women model reduced the sensitivity (82.9% (95% CI 65.7–92.8)) but increased the specificity (72.4% (95% CI 65.3–78.6)).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ET is a significant predictor of abnormality. In the absence of risk factors, our study suggests that invasive procedures may be withheld until the ET is ≥7.1 mm with bleeding and ≥14.5 mm in asymptomatic women with no bleeding.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"186-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644444/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose

To evaluate the endometrial thickness (ET) as a predictor of endometrial abnormalities in postmenopausal women and whether consideration of baseline risk factors increases diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study of postmenopausal women presenting with bleeding or thickened endometrium (≥4 mm) on ultrasound, between 2003 and 2012. Risk factors for endometrial abnormality were analysed using logistic regression. Of 301 women, 220 were symptomatic and 81 were asymptomatic. The median ET was 6 mm (IQR 4–9) for symptomatic women and 9 mm (IQR 6–12) for asymptomatic women.

Results

Abnormal pathology was found in 35 symptomatic (15.9%) and 6 asymptomatic women (7.4%). For each 1 mm increase in ET, the odds of an abnormal diagnosis increased by 16.3% (95% CI 9.6–23.5) for symptomatic and 19.9% (95% CI 3.1–39.3) for asymptomatic women. The Youden's index method identified an ET threshold of ≥7.1mm for symptomatic and ≥14.5mm for asymptomatic women. In symptomatic women the sensitivity was 88.6% (95% CI 72.3–96.3) and specificity 69.2% (95% CI 61.9–75.6), while in asymptomatic women the sensitivity was 50.0% (95% CI 13.9–86.1) and specificity was 89.3% (95% CI 79.5–95.0). The addition of age in the symptomatic women model reduced the sensitivity (82.9% (95% CI 65.7–92.8)) but increased the specificity (72.4% (95% CI 65.3–78.6)).

Conclusion

ET is a significant predictor of abnormality. In the absence of risk factors, our study suggests that invasive procedures may be withheld until the ET is ≥7.1 mm with bleeding and ≥14.5 mm in asymptomatic women with no bleeding.

Abstract Image

经阴道超声评估子宫内膜厚度和基线危险因素作为绝经后妇女子宫内膜异常的预测因子
前言/目的评估子宫内膜厚度(ET)作为绝经后妇女子宫内膜异常的预测因子,以及考虑基线危险因素是否能提高诊断准确性。方法:本研究是一项回顾性观察性研究,研究对象为2003年至2012年间在超声检查中表现为出血或子宫内膜增厚(≥4mm)的绝经后妇女。采用logistic回归分析子宫内膜异常的危险因素。在301名妇女中,220名有症状,81名无症状。有症状女性的中位ET为6 mm (IQR 4-9),无症状女性的中位ET为9 mm (IQR 6 - 12)。结果有症状者病理异常35例(15.9%),无症状者6例(7.4%)。对于有症状的女性,ET每增加1 mm,异常诊断的几率增加16.3% (95% CI 9.6-23.5),对于无症状的女性,异常诊断的几率增加19.9% (95% CI 3.1-39.3)。约登指数法确定有症状女性的ET阈值≥7.1mm,无症状女性的ET阈值≥14.5mm。在有症状的女性中,敏感性为88.6% (95% CI 72.3-96.3),特异性为69.2% (95% CI 61.9-75.6),而在无症状的女性中,敏感性为50.0% (95% CI 13.9-86.1),特异性为89.3% (95% CI 79.5-95.0)。在有症状的女性模型中,年龄的增加降低了敏感性(82.9% (95% CI 65.7-92.8)),但增加了特异性(72.4% (95% CI 65.3-78.6))。结论ET是异常的重要预测因子。在没有危险因素的情况下,我们的研究表明,在ET≥7.1 mm伴有出血和≥14.5 mm无症状无出血的女性时,可以暂停侵入性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信