Co-location of specialized mental health services in an intimate partner violence advocacy organization.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Medicine, Science and the Law Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1177/00258024231195496
Obianuju O Berry, Phyllis Kaufman, Marina Weiss, Elizabeth Fitelson, Catherine Monk
{"title":"Co-location of specialized mental health services in an intimate partner violence advocacy organization.","authors":"Obianuju O Berry, Phyllis Kaufman, Marina Weiss, Elizabeth Fitelson, Catherine Monk","doi":"10.1177/00258024231195496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, services for intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors predominantly focused on advocacy, resulting in service gaps for IPV survivors who need mental health care. When mental health services are offered, there are several barriers that limit treatment engagement. To address these gaps, a novel, integrated care model, comprised of psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and social workers were embedded into the five New York City (NYC) Family Justice Centers (FJCs), to provide free co-located mental health care to adult survivors of IPV alongside the existing advocacy, social, and legal services. This article reports on the evaluation of the Health + Hospitals Family Justice Center Mental Health Program (FJCMHP) via: (i) seven focus groups with FJC clients and staff and Health + Hospitals (H+H) clinicians; and (ii) de-identified online surveys completed by 53 FJC clients and 130 FJC staff. Clients reported increased access to care, with 67.2% seeing a mental health clinician within two weeks of a request, and improvement in symptom relief, including sleep, mood, irritability, reduction in thoughts of self-harm, improved relationships with others, especially their children, and improved self-efficacy in parenting skills. Additionally, FJC staff reported satisfaction with the FJCMHP model, and increased understanding of clients' mental health needs. The evaluation results highlight the feasibility and tolerability of integrated mental health services in a non-medical setting. The evaluation also identifies areas for improvement, as well as the strengths of an integrated, multidisciplinary mental health service program for IPV survivors co-located in a non-medical, advocacy setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":18484,"journal":{"name":"Medicine, Science and the Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine, Science and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024231195496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, services for intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors predominantly focused on advocacy, resulting in service gaps for IPV survivors who need mental health care. When mental health services are offered, there are several barriers that limit treatment engagement. To address these gaps, a novel, integrated care model, comprised of psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and social workers were embedded into the five New York City (NYC) Family Justice Centers (FJCs), to provide free co-located mental health care to adult survivors of IPV alongside the existing advocacy, social, and legal services. This article reports on the evaluation of the Health + Hospitals Family Justice Center Mental Health Program (FJCMHP) via: (i) seven focus groups with FJC clients and staff and Health + Hospitals (H+H) clinicians; and (ii) de-identified online surveys completed by 53 FJC clients and 130 FJC staff. Clients reported increased access to care, with 67.2% seeing a mental health clinician within two weeks of a request, and improvement in symptom relief, including sleep, mood, irritability, reduction in thoughts of self-harm, improved relationships with others, especially their children, and improved self-efficacy in parenting skills. Additionally, FJC staff reported satisfaction with the FJCMHP model, and increased understanding of clients' mental health needs. The evaluation results highlight the feasibility and tolerability of integrated mental health services in a non-medical setting. The evaluation also identifies areas for improvement, as well as the strengths of an integrated, multidisciplinary mental health service program for IPV survivors co-located in a non-medical, advocacy setting.

在亲密伴侣暴力倡导组织内设立专门的心理健康服务机构。
一直以来,针对亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 幸存者的服务主要集中在维权上,这导致需要心理健康护理的 IPV 幸存者无法获得相应的服务。在提供心理健康服务时,也存在一些限制参与治疗的障碍。为了弥补这些不足,一种由精神科医生、临床心理学家和社会工作者组成的新型综合护理模式被植入纽约市(NYC)的五家家庭司法中心(FJCs),在提供现有的维权、社会和法律服务的同时,为 IPV 的成年幸存者提供免费的同地心理健康护理。本文通过以下方式报告了 Health + Hospitals 家庭司法中心心理健康项目(FJCMHP)的评估结果:(i) 与家庭司法中心的客户和员工以及 Health + Hospitals(H+H)的临床医生共同组成的七个焦点小组;(ii) 由 53 名家庭司法中心的客户和 130 名家庭司法中心的员工完成的去标识化在线调查。客户报告称,获得护理的机会增加了,67.2%的客户在提出请求后两周内见到了心理健康临床医生,症状得到缓解,包括睡眠、情绪、易怒、减少自残念头、改善与他人(尤其是子女)的关系,以及提高为人父母的自我效能。此外,家庭司法中心的工作人员对 FJCMHP 模式表示满意,并对服务对象的心理健康需求有了更多的了解。评估结果突显了在非医疗环境中提供综合心理健康服务的可行性和可承受性。评估还指出了需要改进的地方,以及在非医疗、宣传环境中为 IPV 幸存者提供综合、多学科心理健康服务项目的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine, Science and the Law
Medicine, Science and the Law 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine, Science and the Law is the official journal of the British Academy for Forensic Sciences (BAFS). It is a peer reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the knowledge of forensic science and medicine. The journal aims to inform its readers from a broad perspective and demonstrate the interrelated nature and scope of the forensic disciplines. Through a variety of authoritative research articles submitted from across the globe, it covers a range of topical medico-legal issues. The journal keeps its readers informed of developments and trends through reporting, discussing and debating current issues of importance in forensic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信