Effectiveness of multi-professional educational interventions to train Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) - a Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sonja Lindner-Rabl, Katrin Singler, M Cristina Polidori, Carolin Herzog, Eleftheria Antoniadou, Gerald Seinost, Regina Roller-Wirnsberger
{"title":"Effectiveness of multi-professional educational interventions to train Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) - a Systematic Review.","authors":"Sonja Lindner-Rabl,&nbsp;Katrin Singler,&nbsp;M Cristina Polidori,&nbsp;Carolin Herzog,&nbsp;Eleftheria Antoniadou,&nbsp;Gerald Seinost,&nbsp;Regina Roller-Wirnsberger","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As the world population ages, health and social care professionals are increasingly confronted with patients with chronic long-term conditions and multimorbidity, requiring an extensive assessment and integrated care management strategy. The aim of this paper was to systematically collect and assess evidence of interprofessional education and training strategies for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to build a competent health workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase were searched for studies illustrating effectiveness of educational interventions for teaching and training CGA in an interprofessional context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 21 identified studies, a great variability and heterogeneity in duration, setting and design of the interventions was identified. Promising results were found in the domains analysed, ranging from knowledge and skills; practices and behaviour; patient health outcomes; attitudes and perceptions to collaboration and quality of care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Education and training of transversal skills within a continuous learning approach is key to equip the health care workforce for successful CGA performance in an interprofessional environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research in this field is recommended to strengthen the evidence-base towards development of a resilient and integrated health care workforce for an ageing population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"23 3","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10437136/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: As the world population ages, health and social care professionals are increasingly confronted with patients with chronic long-term conditions and multimorbidity, requiring an extensive assessment and integrated care management strategy. The aim of this paper was to systematically collect and assess evidence of interprofessional education and training strategies for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to build a competent health workforce.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the databases Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase were searched for studies illustrating effectiveness of educational interventions for teaching and training CGA in an interprofessional context.

Results: Based on 21 identified studies, a great variability and heterogeneity in duration, setting and design of the interventions was identified. Promising results were found in the domains analysed, ranging from knowledge and skills; practices and behaviour; patient health outcomes; attitudes and perceptions to collaboration and quality of care.

Discussion: Education and training of transversal skills within a continuous learning approach is key to equip the health care workforce for successful CGA performance in an interprofessional environment.

Conclusion: Further research in this field is recommended to strengthen the evidence-base towards development of a resilient and integrated health care workforce for an ageing population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多专业教育干预培训老年综合评估(CGA)的有效性——系统回顾。
导言:随着世界人口老龄化,卫生和社会保健专业人员越来越多地面对患有慢性长期疾病和多种疾病的患者,需要广泛的评估和综合护理管理战略。本文的目的是系统地收集和评估综合老年评估(CGA)跨专业教育和培训战略的证据,以建立一支合格的卫生人力队伍。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,检索Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane和Embase数据库,以研究说明教育干预在跨专业背景下教学和培训CGA的有效性。结果:基于21项已确定的研究,确定了干预措施的持续时间、设置和设计方面存在很大的可变性和异质性。在分析的领域中发现了有希望的结果,从知识和技能;做法和行为;患者健康结果;对合作和护理质量的态度和看法。讨论:在持续学习方法中,横向技能的教育和培训是使卫生保健工作人员在跨专业环境中成功执行CGA的关键。结论:建议在这一领域进行进一步研究,以加强为人口老龄化发展一支有弹性和综合的卫生保健队伍的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信