Dual-Task Training Effects on the Cognitive-Motor Interference in Individuals with Intellectual Disability.

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES

Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2023.2201183

Rihab Borji, Thoraya Fendri, Sofien Kasmi, Emna Haddar, Rabeb Laatar, Sonia Sahli, Haithem Rebai

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study explored the effect of dual task (DT) training compared to single task (ST) training on postural and cognitive performances in DT conditions in individuals with intellectual disability (ID). Postural sways and cognitive performances were measured separately and simultaneously before and after 8 weeks in the ST training group (STTG), the DT training group (DTTG) and the control group (CG) that did not received any training. Before training, postural sways and cognitive performances were higher in the DT condition compared to ST one in all groups. After training, postural sways were higher in the DT condition compared to the ST only in the STTG and the CG. The cognitive performance increased after training only in the DTTG.

查看原文本刊更多论文

双任务训练对智障人士认知-运动干扰的影响

本研究探讨了双重任务（DT）训练与单一任务（ST）训练相比，对智障人士（ID）在DT条件下的姿势和认知表现的影响。在 ST 训练组（STTG）、DT 训练组（DTTG）和未接受任何训练的对照组（CG）中，分别在 8 周前和 8 周后同时测量了姿势摇摆和认知表现。在训练前，所有组中 DT 条件下的姿势摆动和认知表现均高于 ST 条件下的姿势摆动和认知表现。训练后，只有 STTG 和 CG 组的姿势摇摆在 DT 条件下高于 ST 条件。只有 DTTG 的认知能力在训练后有所提高。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.