3D Printed Microfluidics.

Anna V Nielsen, Michael J Beauchamp, Gregory P Nordin, Adam T Woolley
{"title":"3D Printed Microfluidics.","authors":"Anna V Nielsen, Michael J Beauchamp, Gregory P Nordin, Adam T Woolley","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anchem-091619-102649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional microfabrication techniques suffer from several disadvantages, including the inability to create truly three-dimensional (3D) architectures, expensive and time-consuming processes when changing device designs, and difficulty in transitioning from prototyping fabrication to bulk manufacturing. 3D printing is an emerging technique that could overcome these disadvantages. While most 3D printed fluidic devices and features to date have been on the millifluidic size scale, some truly microfluidic devices have been shown. Currently, stereolithography is the most promising approach for routine creation of microfluidic structures, but several approaches under development also have potential. Microfluidic 3D printing is still in an early stage, similar to where polydimethylsiloxane was two decades ago. With additional work to advance printer hardware and software control, expand and improve resin and printing material selections, and realize additional applications for 3D printed devices, we foresee 3D printing becoming the dominant microfluidic fabrication method.</p>","PeriodicalId":72239,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282950/pdf/nihms-1067292.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-091619-102649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional microfabrication techniques suffer from several disadvantages, including the inability to create truly three-dimensional (3D) architectures, expensive and time-consuming processes when changing device designs, and difficulty in transitioning from prototyping fabrication to bulk manufacturing. 3D printing is an emerging technique that could overcome these disadvantages. While most 3D printed fluidic devices and features to date have been on the millifluidic size scale, some truly microfluidic devices have been shown. Currently, stereolithography is the most promising approach for routine creation of microfluidic structures, but several approaches under development also have potential. Microfluidic 3D printing is still in an early stage, similar to where polydimethylsiloxane was two decades ago. With additional work to advance printer hardware and software control, expand and improve resin and printing material selections, and realize additional applications for 3D printed devices, we foresee 3D printing becoming the dominant microfluidic fabrication method.

3D 打印微流体。
传统的微加工技术有几个缺点,包括无法创建真正的三维(3D)架构,改变设备设计时过程昂贵且耗时,以及难以从原型制造过渡到批量制造。三维打印是一种新兴技术,可以克服这些缺点。迄今为止,大多数三维打印流体设备和功能都是毫流体级的,但也出现了一些真正的微流体设备。目前,立体光刻技术是常规创建微流体结构的最有前途的方法,但正在开发的几种方法也很有潜力。微流体三维打印仍处于早期阶段,类似于二十年前的聚二甲基硅氧烷。随着打印机硬件和软件控制的进一步发展,树脂和打印材料选择的扩大和改进,以及三维打印设备更多应用的实现,我们预计三维打印将成为主流的微流体制造方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信