Awareness of COVID-19 at the Local Level: Perceptions and Political Consequences.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jake Haselswerdt, Sarah Gollust
{"title":"Awareness of COVID-19 at the Local Level: Perceptions and Political Consequences.","authors":"Jake Haselswerdt,&nbsp;Sarah Gollust","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10351896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Although the COVID-19 pandemic has affected all Americans, its effects have been unequally distributed across geographic areas. These variations in the pandemic's severity-and public perceptions thereof-likely have political consequences. This study examines the factors that shape perceptions of COVID-19 at the local level and assesses the consequences of these perceptions for public opinion and political behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors use questions from the 2020 Cooperative Election Study linked with county-level COVID-19 rates to examine predictors of respondents' perceptions of the pandemic's severity in their county, including demographic, political, and informational characteristics. The study also examines whether these perceptions are associated with public opinion and voter behavior.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Respondents' perceptions are correlated with case rates. Liberals and Democrats estimate the pandemic to be more severe than Republicans and conservatives do, as do CNN viewers compared to Fox News viewers. The study found only limited evidence of a relationship between perceptions of the pandemic in a respondent's county and political outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results add to the accumulating evidence that both news media and political predispositions shape perceptions of COVID-19, and they raise important questions about whether and how the pandemic has shaped-and will continue to shape-political outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10351896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has affected all Americans, its effects have been unequally distributed across geographic areas. These variations in the pandemic's severity-and public perceptions thereof-likely have political consequences. This study examines the factors that shape perceptions of COVID-19 at the local level and assesses the consequences of these perceptions for public opinion and political behaviors.

Methods: The authors use questions from the 2020 Cooperative Election Study linked with county-level COVID-19 rates to examine predictors of respondents' perceptions of the pandemic's severity in their county, including demographic, political, and informational characteristics. The study also examines whether these perceptions are associated with public opinion and voter behavior.

Findings: Respondents' perceptions are correlated with case rates. Liberals and Democrats estimate the pandemic to be more severe than Republicans and conservatives do, as do CNN viewers compared to Fox News viewers. The study found only limited evidence of a relationship between perceptions of the pandemic in a respondent's county and political outcomes.

Conclusions: The results add to the accumulating evidence that both news media and political predispositions shape perceptions of COVID-19, and they raise important questions about whether and how the pandemic has shaped-and will continue to shape-political outcomes.

地方一级对COVID-19的认识:看法和政治后果。
背景:尽管COVID-19大流行影响了所有美国人,但其影响在不同地理区域的分布并不均匀。疫情严重程度的这些差异——以及公众对此的看法——可能会产生政治后果。本研究考察了影响地方对COVID-19认知的因素,并评估了这些认知对公众舆论和政治行为的影响。方法:作者使用了2020年合作选举研究中与县级COVID-19发病率相关的问题,以检查受访者对其县大流行严重程度的看法的预测因素,包括人口、政治和信息特征。该研究还调查了这些看法是否与公众舆论和选民行为有关。调查结果:受访者的看法与发病率相关。自由派和民主党都比共和党和保守派认为疫情更严重,CNN的观众也比福克斯新闻的观众认为疫情更严重。该研究发现,只有有限的证据表明,受访者所在国家对大流行的看法与政治结果之间存在关系。结论:越来越多的证据表明,新闻媒体和政治倾向都会影响人们对COVID-19的看法,这些结果进一步证明了这一点,并提出了关于疫情是否以及如何影响并将继续影响政治结果的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信