Effects of Rumination and Mindful Self-Focus Inductions During Daily Life in Patients With Remitted Depression: An Experimental Ambulatory Assessment Study

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Christine Kuehner, Isabelle F. Schricker, Sibel Nayman, Iris Reinhard, Vera Zamoscik, Peter Kirsch, Silke Huffziger
{"title":"Effects of Rumination and Mindful Self-Focus Inductions During Daily Life in Patients With Remitted Depression: An Experimental Ambulatory Assessment Study","authors":"Christine Kuehner,&nbsp;Isabelle F. Schricker,&nbsp;Sibel Nayman,&nbsp;Iris Reinhard,&nbsp;Vera Zamoscik,&nbsp;Peter Kirsch,&nbsp;Silke Huffziger","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rumination has been proposed as an important risk factor for depression, whereas mindful attention is considered a protective form of self-focusing. Experimental studies have demonstrated differential effects of these modes when induced in the lab. However, their impact on daily life processes is poorly understood, particularly in individuals vulnerable to depressive relapses. The aim of our study was to examine short- and longer-term effects of repeated brief rumination and mindful self-focus inductions during daily life on momentary mood, cognitions, and cortisol in patients with remitted depression (rMDD) as well as in healthy individuals, and to identify their potential differential effects in these groups. The study involved repeated short ambulatory inductions of a ruminative or a mindful self-focus during daily life with additional assessments of momentary mood, rumination, self-acceptance, and cortisol over 4 consecutive days in a sample of patients with rMDD (<em>n</em> = 32, ≥2 lifetime episodes, age 19–55 years) and matched healthy controls (<em>n</em> = 32, age 21–54 years). Multilevel models revealed differential immediate effects of the two induction modes on all momentary mood and cognitive outcomes (all <em>p’</em>s &lt; .001), but not on cortisol. Detrimental effects of rumination over mindful self-focus inductions were particularly strong for cognitions in the patient group. Longer-term effects of the inductions over the day were lacking. This study underlines immediate deteriorating effects of an induced ruminative compared to a mindful self-focus on momentary mood and cognitions during daily life in patients with rMDD and in healthy individuals. The observed stronger rumination-related reactivity in patients suggests heightened cognitive vulnerability. Understanding rumination- and mindfulness-based mechanisms of action in real-life settings can help to establish mechanism-based treatment options for relapse prevention in depression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"54 5","pages":"Pages 902-915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789423000394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Rumination has been proposed as an important risk factor for depression, whereas mindful attention is considered a protective form of self-focusing. Experimental studies have demonstrated differential effects of these modes when induced in the lab. However, their impact on daily life processes is poorly understood, particularly in individuals vulnerable to depressive relapses. The aim of our study was to examine short- and longer-term effects of repeated brief rumination and mindful self-focus inductions during daily life on momentary mood, cognitions, and cortisol in patients with remitted depression (rMDD) as well as in healthy individuals, and to identify their potential differential effects in these groups. The study involved repeated short ambulatory inductions of a ruminative or a mindful self-focus during daily life with additional assessments of momentary mood, rumination, self-acceptance, and cortisol over 4 consecutive days in a sample of patients with rMDD (n = 32, ≥2 lifetime episodes, age 19–55 years) and matched healthy controls (n = 32, age 21–54 years). Multilevel models revealed differential immediate effects of the two induction modes on all momentary mood and cognitive outcomes (all p’s < .001), but not on cortisol. Detrimental effects of rumination over mindful self-focus inductions were particularly strong for cognitions in the patient group. Longer-term effects of the inductions over the day were lacking. This study underlines immediate deteriorating effects of an induced ruminative compared to a mindful self-focus on momentary mood and cognitions during daily life in patients with rMDD and in healthy individuals. The observed stronger rumination-related reactivity in patients suggests heightened cognitive vulnerability. Understanding rumination- and mindfulness-based mechanisms of action in real-life settings can help to establish mechanism-based treatment options for relapse prevention in depression.

反刍和正念自我聚焦诱导在抑郁症缓解患者日常生活中的作用:一项实验性门诊评估研究
反刍被认为是抑郁症的一个重要风险因素,而注意被认为是自我专注的一种保护形式。实验研究表明,在实验室中诱导时,这些模式会产生不同的影响。然而,人们对它们对日常生活过程的影响知之甚少,尤其是在易患抑郁症复发的个体中。我们研究的目的是检验日常生活中反复短暂沉思和正念自我专注诱导对缓解型抑郁症(rMDD)患者和健康个体的瞬时情绪、认知和皮质醇的短期和长期影响,并确定它们在这些群体中的潜在差异影响。这项研究涉及在日常生活中反复进行沉思或专注自我的短期动态诱导,并在连续4天内对rMDD(n = 32,≥2次终生发作,年龄19–55岁)和匹配的健康对照组(n = 32岁,年龄21-54岁)。多层次模型揭示了两种诱导模式对所有瞬时情绪和认知结果的不同即时影响(均为p <; .001),而不是皮质醇。沉思对正念自我专注诱导的不良影响对患者组的认知尤其强烈。一天中的诱导缺乏长期效果。这项研究强调了在rMDD患者和健康个体的日常生活中,与专注于瞬间情绪和认知相比,诱导沉思的即时恶化影响。观察到的患者更强的沉思相关反应表明认知脆弱性增强。了解现实生活中基于沉思和正念的行动机制,有助于建立基于机制的抑郁症复发预防治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信