Participating in eradication: how Guinea worm redefined eradication, and eradication redefined Guinea worm, 1985-2022.

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jonathan David Roberts
{"title":"Participating in eradication: how Guinea worm redefined eradication, and eradication redefined Guinea worm, 1985-2022.","authors":"Jonathan David Roberts","doi":"10.1017/mdh.2023.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guinea worm disease (dracunculiasis) is a debilitating waterborne disease. Once widespread, it is now on the brink of eradication. However, the Guinea Worm Eradication Programme (GWEP), like guinea worm itself, has been under-studied by historians. The GWEP demonstrates an unusual model of eradication, one focused on primary healthcare (PHC), community participation, health education and behavioural change (safe drinking). The PHC movement collided with a waterborne disease, which required rapid but straightforward treatment to prevent transmission, creating a historical space for the emergence of village-based volunteer health workers, as local actors realigned global health policy on a local level. These Village Volunteers placed eradication in the hands of residents of endemic areas, epitomising the participation-focused nature of the GWEP. This participatory mode of eradication highlights the agency of those in endemic areas, who, through volunteering, safe drinking and community self-help, have been the driving force behind dracunculiasis eradication. In the twenty-first century, guinea worm has become firstly a problem of human mobility, as global health has struggled to contain cases in refugees and nomads, and latterly a zoonotic disease, as guinea worm has shifted hosts to become primarily a parasite of dogs. This demonstrates both the potential of One Health approaches and the need for One Health to adopt from PHC and the GWEP a focus on the health of humans and animals in isolated and impoverished areas. Guinea worm demonstrates how the biological and the historical interact, with the GWEP and guinea worm shaping each other over the course of the eradication programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":18275,"journal":{"name":"Medical History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/59/1b/S0025727323000182a.PMC10404518.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2023.18","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guinea worm disease (dracunculiasis) is a debilitating waterborne disease. Once widespread, it is now on the brink of eradication. However, the Guinea Worm Eradication Programme (GWEP), like guinea worm itself, has been under-studied by historians. The GWEP demonstrates an unusual model of eradication, one focused on primary healthcare (PHC), community participation, health education and behavioural change (safe drinking). The PHC movement collided with a waterborne disease, which required rapid but straightforward treatment to prevent transmission, creating a historical space for the emergence of village-based volunteer health workers, as local actors realigned global health policy on a local level. These Village Volunteers placed eradication in the hands of residents of endemic areas, epitomising the participation-focused nature of the GWEP. This participatory mode of eradication highlights the agency of those in endemic areas, who, through volunteering, safe drinking and community self-help, have been the driving force behind dracunculiasis eradication. In the twenty-first century, guinea worm has become firstly a problem of human mobility, as global health has struggled to contain cases in refugees and nomads, and latterly a zoonotic disease, as guinea worm has shifted hosts to become primarily a parasite of dogs. This demonstrates both the potential of One Health approaches and the need for One Health to adopt from PHC and the GWEP a focus on the health of humans and animals in isolated and impoverished areas. Guinea worm demonstrates how the biological and the historical interact, with the GWEP and guinea worm shaping each other over the course of the eradication programme.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

参与根除:麦地那龙线虫如何重新定义根除,以及根除如何重新定义麦地那龙线虫,1985-2022。
麦地那龙线虫病(麦地那龙线虫病)是一种使人衰弱的水媒疾病。它曾经广泛传播,现在已处于被消灭的边缘。然而,麦地那龙线虫根除计划(GWEP),就像麦地那龙线虫本身一样,一直没有得到历史学家的充分研究。全球环境行动计划展示了一种不同寻常的根除模式,侧重于初级卫生保健、社区参与、卫生教育和行为改变(安全饮酒)。初级保健运动与一种水传播疾病相冲突,这种疾病需要快速而直接的治疗来防止传播,这为以村庄为基础的志愿卫生工作者的出现创造了历史空间,因为地方行动者在地方一级重新调整了全球卫生政策。这些村志愿者将根除工作交给流行地区的居民,体现了全球行动计划以参与为重点的性质。这种参与性的消灭模式突出了流行地区人民的作用,他们通过志愿服务、安全饮水和社区自助,成为消灭麦地那龙线虫病背后的推动力量。在21世纪,麦地那龙线虫首先成为一个人类流动的问题,因为全球卫生部门一直在努力控制难民和游牧民的病例,后来又成为一种人畜共患疾病,因为麦地那龙线虫已经转移宿主,主要成为狗的寄生虫。这既表明了“同一个健康”方法的潜力,也表明了“同一个健康”需要从初级保健和全球卫生行动计划中吸取教训,把重点放在偏远和贫困地区的人类和动物健康上。麦地那龙线虫展示了生物学和历史是如何相互作用的,在根除规划的过程中,全球免疫系统和麦地那龙线虫相互影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical History
Medical History 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical History is a refereed journal devoted to all aspects of the history of medicine and health, with the goal of broadening and deepening the understanding of the field, in the widest sense, by historical studies of the highest quality. It is also the journal of the European Association for the History of Medicine and Health. The membership of the Editorial Board, which includes senior members of the EAHMH, reflects the commitment to the finest international standards in refereeing of submitted papers and the reviewing of books. The journal publishes in English, but welcomes submissions from scholars for whom English is not a first language; language and copy-editing assistance will be provided wherever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信