Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare and sleeved arms - what does it uncover?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000660
Rotem Tal-Ben Ishay, Adi Leiba, Vladimir Rappoprt, Avital Angel-Korman, Zeev Katzir
{"title":"Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare and sleeved arms - what does it uncover?","authors":"Rotem Tal-Ben Ishay, Adi Leiba, Vladimir Rappoprt, Avital Angel-Korman, Zeev Katzir","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate office blood pressure (BP) measurement remains crucial in diagnosing and managing hypertension. In this study, we aimed to compare BP measurements done over a bare arm versus a sleeved arm, while controlling all other possible sources of variance. We collected BP measurements of 100 hypertensive patients visiting a nephrology and hypertension clinic between January 2019 and December 2023. Measurements were taken by a single operator and according to the updated guidelines. BP measurements were performed first with one arm bare, and the other arm sleeved, with measurements taken simultaneously. Then, measurements were again taken simultaneously after exposing the arm which was first sleeved, and dressing the arm which was bare at first. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed to compare each patient's measurements on each arm. No statistically significant differences were found between the sleeved and the bare arm measurements, with one exception of SBP measured on the left arm (slightly lower SBP on the bare arm). While looking at the absolute value of differences, the median difference was impressive with a 7-8 mmHg systolic difference and 5.5 mmHg diastolic difference. Our study revealed a robust and unpredicted effect of clothing on BP; in some patients, BP was increased while in others decreased. Therefore, we believe there is importance in measuring BP on bare skin, regardless of clothing or sleeve type.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate office blood pressure (BP) measurement remains crucial in diagnosing and managing hypertension. In this study, we aimed to compare BP measurements done over a bare arm versus a sleeved arm, while controlling all other possible sources of variance. We collected BP measurements of 100 hypertensive patients visiting a nephrology and hypertension clinic between January 2019 and December 2023. Measurements were taken by a single operator and according to the updated guidelines. BP measurements were performed first with one arm bare, and the other arm sleeved, with measurements taken simultaneously. Then, measurements were again taken simultaneously after exposing the arm which was first sleeved, and dressing the arm which was bare at first. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed to compare each patient's measurements on each arm. No statistically significant differences were found between the sleeved and the bare arm measurements, with one exception of SBP measured on the left arm (slightly lower SBP on the bare arm). While looking at the absolute value of differences, the median difference was impressive with a 7-8 mmHg systolic difference and 5.5 mmHg diastolic difference. Our study revealed a robust and unpredicted effect of clothing on BP; in some patients, BP was increased while in others decreased. Therefore, we believe there is importance in measuring BP on bare skin, regardless of clothing or sleeve type.

裸臂和袖臂血压测量结果的比较--能发现什么?
准确的办公室血压(BP)测量对于诊断和管理高血压仍然至关重要。在本研究中,我们旨在比较裸臂和带袖手臂的血压测量结果,同时控制所有其他可能的差异来源。我们在 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间收集了 100 名到肾病和高血压诊所就诊的高血压患者的血压测量结果。测量由一名操作员根据最新指南进行。测量血压时,首先一只手臂裸露,另一只手臂戴袖套,同时进行测量。然后,在暴露先戴袖套的手臂和包扎先裸露的手臂后,再次同时进行测量。采用非参数 Wilcoxon 方法比较每位患者在每只手臂上的测量结果。除左臂测量的 SBP 外(裸露手臂的 SBP 略低),戴套袖和裸露手臂的测量结果在统计学上没有明显差异。从差异的绝对值来看,中位差异令人印象深刻,收缩压差异为 7-8 mmHg,舒张压差异为 5.5 mmHg。我们的研究显示,衣服对血压的影响是强大而不可预测的;在一些患者中,血压升高,而在另一些患者中,血压降低。因此,我们认为在裸露皮肤上测量血压非常重要,无论衣服或袖子类型如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信