Measles and Rubella Seroprevalence Among Children and Adolescents of Córdoba, Argentina: A Cross-Section Study in the Context of the Elimination Program.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Viral immunology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1089/vim.2022.0181
Mauro Pedranti, María Beatriz Isa, María Inés Riberi, Gabriela Hernandez, Jimena Alfaro, Magdalena Tenaglia, María Belén Colazo Salbetti, Juan Javier Mladin, Silvia Nates, María Pilar Adamo
{"title":"Measles and Rubella Seroprevalence Among Children and Adolescents of Córdoba, Argentina: A Cross-Section Study in the Context of the Elimination Program.","authors":"Mauro Pedranti,&nbsp;María Beatriz Isa,&nbsp;María Inés Riberi,&nbsp;Gabriela Hernandez,&nbsp;Jimena Alfaro,&nbsp;Magdalena Tenaglia,&nbsp;María Belén Colazo Salbetti,&nbsp;Juan Javier Mladin,&nbsp;Silvia Nates,&nbsp;María Pilar Adamo","doi":"10.1089/vim.2022.0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We determined anti-rubella and anti-measles immunoglobulin G (IgG) in 7- to 19-year-old children and adolescents with vaccine only-induced immunity of Córdoba, Argentina, during a 6-month period over 2021-2022. Of the 180 individuals studied, 92.2% and 88.3% were positive for anti-measles and anti-rubella IgG, respectively. No significant differences were found comparing anti-rubella IgG concentrations (<i>p</i> = 0.144) and anti-measles IgG concentrations (<i>p</i> = 0.105) of individuals classified by age, but anti-measles IgG and anti-rubella IgG levels were significantly higher among female individuals compared with males (<i>p</i> = 0.031 and <i>p</i> = 0.036, respectively). Female subjects in the younger age group had higher concentrations of anti-rubella IgG as well (<i>p</i> = 0.020), even when anti-measles IgG concentrations did not differ among female age-subgroups (<i>p</i> = 0.187). In contrast, age subgroups of male individuals did not have significantly different IgG concentrations for rubella (<i>p</i> = 0.745) or measles (<i>p</i> = 0.124). Among samples with discordant results (22/180, 12.6%), 9.1% were negative for rubella but positive for measles; 13.6% were equivocal for rubella and positive for measles; 22.7% were equivocal for rubella and negative for measles, while 54.5% were positive for rubella but negative for measles. The findings indicate a seroprevalence below recommended for preventing measles in the population studied, while they evidence the need for standardization of serological tests for rubella IgG.</p>","PeriodicalId":23665,"journal":{"name":"Viral immunology","volume":"36 6","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viral immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2022.0181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We determined anti-rubella and anti-measles immunoglobulin G (IgG) in 7- to 19-year-old children and adolescents with vaccine only-induced immunity of Córdoba, Argentina, during a 6-month period over 2021-2022. Of the 180 individuals studied, 92.2% and 88.3% were positive for anti-measles and anti-rubella IgG, respectively. No significant differences were found comparing anti-rubella IgG concentrations (p = 0.144) and anti-measles IgG concentrations (p = 0.105) of individuals classified by age, but anti-measles IgG and anti-rubella IgG levels were significantly higher among female individuals compared with males (p = 0.031 and p = 0.036, respectively). Female subjects in the younger age group had higher concentrations of anti-rubella IgG as well (p = 0.020), even when anti-measles IgG concentrations did not differ among female age-subgroups (p = 0.187). In contrast, age subgroups of male individuals did not have significantly different IgG concentrations for rubella (p = 0.745) or measles (p = 0.124). Among samples with discordant results (22/180, 12.6%), 9.1% were negative for rubella but positive for measles; 13.6% were equivocal for rubella and positive for measles; 22.7% were equivocal for rubella and negative for measles, while 54.5% were positive for rubella but negative for measles. The findings indicate a seroprevalence below recommended for preventing measles in the population studied, while they evidence the need for standardization of serological tests for rubella IgG.

阿根廷科尔多瓦儿童和青少年麻疹和风疹血清流行率:消除方案背景下的横断面研究。
在2021-2022年的6个月期间,我们在阿根廷科尔多瓦对7至19岁的儿童和青少年进行了抗风疹和抗麻疹免疫球蛋白G(IgG)的测定,这些儿童和青少年只接种了疫苗诱导免疫。在180名受试者中,抗麻疹和抗风疹IgG阳性率分别为92.2%和88.3%。抗风疹IgG浓度比较无显著差异(p = 0.144)和抗麻疹IgG浓度(p = 0.105),但女性个体的抗麻疹IgG和抗风疹IgG水平显著高于男性(p = 0.031和p = 0.036)。年龄较小的女性受试者的抗风疹IgG浓度也较高(p = 0.020),即使抗麻疹IgG浓度在女性年龄组之间没有差异(p = 0.187)。相反,男性个体的年龄亚组对风疹的IgG浓度没有显著差异(p = 0.745)或麻疹(p = 0.124)。在结果不一致的样本中(22/180,12.6%),9.1%的样本对风疹呈阴性,但对麻疹呈阳性;13.6%的人对风疹不确定,对麻疹呈阳性;22.7%的人对风疹不确定,对麻疹呈阴性,54.5%的人对麻疹呈阳性。研究结果表明,在所研究的人群中,血清流行率低于预防麻疹的推荐水平,同时也证明了风疹IgG血清学检测标准化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Viral immunology
Viral immunology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Viral Immunology delivers cutting-edge peer-reviewed research on rare, emerging, and under-studied viruses, with special focus on analyzing mutual relationships between external viruses and internal immunity. Original research, reviews, and commentaries on relevant viruses are presented in clinical, translational, and basic science articles for researchers in multiple disciplines. Viral Immunology coverage includes: Human and animal viral immunology Research and development of viral vaccines, including field trials Immunological characterization of viral components Virus-based immunological diseases, including autoimmune syndromes Pathogenic mechanisms Viral diagnostics Tumor and cancer immunology with virus as the primary factor Viral immunology methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信