Matters of care and the good death - rhetoric or reality?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aileen Collier, Michael Chapman
{"title":"Matters of care and the good death - rhetoric or reality?","authors":"Aileen Collier,&nbsp;Michael Chapman","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The notion of a 'good death' is central to hospice and palliative care philosophy. This review interrogates social imaginaries of the 'good death' in the context of current global, health and sociopolitical challenges.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research literature and policy documents across fields continue to place emphasis on the 'good death'. As part of the equity turn in palliative care, there is a growing body of work highlighting the diverse perspectives of people whose voices were heretofore not understood. Inequities are evident not only in terms of who has access to a 'good death' but also related to the effects of the dominant 'good death' script itself.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is increasing evidence that pursuit of the 'good death' narrative may be counter to supporting people as they are living and dying. The authors instead argue for a research, policy and practice shift to 'matters of care'.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The notion of a 'good death' is central to hospice and palliative care philosophy. This review interrogates social imaginaries of the 'good death' in the context of current global, health and sociopolitical challenges.

Recent findings: Research literature and policy documents across fields continue to place emphasis on the 'good death'. As part of the equity turn in palliative care, there is a growing body of work highlighting the diverse perspectives of people whose voices were heretofore not understood. Inequities are evident not only in terms of who has access to a 'good death' but also related to the effects of the dominant 'good death' script itself.

Summary: There is increasing evidence that pursuit of the 'good death' narrative may be counter to supporting people as they are living and dying. The authors instead argue for a research, policy and practice shift to 'matters of care'.

关心和善终的问题——修辞还是现实?
综述目的:“善终”的概念是临终关怀和姑息治疗哲学的核心。本综述在当前全球、健康和社会政治挑战的背景下,对“善死”的社会想象进行了质疑。最近的发现:各领域的研究文献和政策文件继续强调“善死”。作为缓和医疗公平转向的一部分,越来越多的工作强调了人们的不同观点,而这些人的声音迄今尚未被理解。不平等不仅体现在谁有机会获得“善终”,而且与主导的“善终”剧本本身的影响有关。总结:越来越多的证据表明,追求“善终”的叙述可能与支持人们的生活和死亡是背道而驰的。相反,作者主张将研究、政策和实践转向“护理问题”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信