Prognostic value of pretreatment FDG PET/CT in uterine cervical cancer according to two major histologic types: squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Q3 Medicine
Tomoaki Otani, Kanae Kawai Miyake, Takayoshi Ishimori, Aki Kido, Tsuneo Saga, Yuji Nakamoto
{"title":"Prognostic value of pretreatment FDG PET/CT in uterine cervical cancer according to two major histologic types: squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Tomoaki Otani,&nbsp;Kanae Kawai Miyake,&nbsp;Takayoshi Ishimori,&nbsp;Aki Kido,&nbsp;Tsuneo Saga,&nbsp;Yuji Nakamoto","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69159.1481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment Positron emission tomography / computed tomography using <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) in cervical cancer according to two major histologic types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-three squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients and 35 adenocarcinoma (AC) patients who underwent pretreatment FDG-PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>), mean standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub>), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor were calculated. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare correlations between each PET parameter and overall survival (OS). The prognostic values of imaging and clinical parameters were assessed using uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and TLG were significantly higher in SCC than in AC (p<0.01 each). No significant difference in MTV was seen between the two groups (p=0.10). As for Kaplan-Meier analyses, in SCC, patients with SUV<sub>max</sub>, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, MTV, and TLG exceeding cutoff values tended to show worse OS than patients with lower values (p=0.07, p=0.27, p<0.01, and p=0.01, respectively, for OS). On the other hand, in AC, patients with MTV and TLG exceeding cutoff values showed significantly worse PFS and OS (p<0.01 each for OS), while SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub> were unrelated to OS (p=0.91 and p=0.83, respectively for OS). As for multivariable analyses, in SCC, TLG was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p=0.01). In AC, MTV was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data suggest that FDG-PET/CT would be useful for predicting prognosis in cervical cancer, although the clinical significance of quantitative values may differ according to histopathological type.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69159.1481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment Positron emission tomography / computed tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) in cervical cancer according to two major histologic types.

Methods: Eighty-three squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients and 35 adenocarcinoma (AC) patients who underwent pretreatment FDG-PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor were calculated. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare correlations between each PET parameter and overall survival (OS). The prognostic values of imaging and clinical parameters were assessed using uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG were significantly higher in SCC than in AC (p<0.01 each). No significant difference in MTV was seen between the two groups (p=0.10). As for Kaplan-Meier analyses, in SCC, patients with SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG exceeding cutoff values tended to show worse OS than patients with lower values (p=0.07, p=0.27, p<0.01, and p=0.01, respectively, for OS). On the other hand, in AC, patients with MTV and TLG exceeding cutoff values showed significantly worse PFS and OS (p<0.01 each for OS), while SUVmax and SUVmean were unrelated to OS (p=0.91 and p=0.83, respectively for OS). As for multivariable analyses, in SCC, TLG was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p=0.01). In AC, MTV was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p=0.02).

Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that FDG-PET/CT would be useful for predicting prognosis in cervical cancer, although the clinical significance of quantitative values may differ according to histopathological type.

根据宫颈鳞癌和腺癌两大组织学类型,FDG PET/CT预处理对宫颈癌的预后价值。
目的:本研究的目的是评估预处理正电子发射断层扫描/ 18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)对宫颈癌两种主要组织学类型的预后价值。方法:回顾性分析83例鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和35例腺癌(AC)患者行FDG-PET/CT预处理的临床资料。计算原发肿瘤的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、平均标准化摄取值(SUVmean)、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和病灶糖酵解总量(TLG)。Kaplan-Meier分析用于比较各PET参数与总生存期(OS)之间的相关性。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型评估影像学和临床参数的预后价值。结果:SCC患者的SUVmax、SUVmean、TLG明显高于AC患者(pmax、SUVmean、MTV、TLG超过临界值的患者OS较低,p=0.07、p=0.27, pmax、SUVmean与OS无关(OS分别为p=0.91、p=0.83)。在多变量分析中,在SCC中,TLG被确定为OS的独立预后因素(p=0.01)。在AC中,MTV被确定为OS的独立预后因素(p=0.02)。结论:FDG-PET/CT可用于宫颈癌预后预测,但其定量值的临床意义可能因组织病理类型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信