Avi Shupak, Khaldon Abo-Saleh, Margalith Kaminer, Nabil Faranesh
{"title":"[THE VIDEO HEAD IMPULSE TEST (VHIT): CAN WE RELY ON THE GAIN PARAMETER ALONE?]","authors":"Avi Shupak, Khaldon Abo-Saleh, Margalith Kaminer, Nabil Faranesh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While the bedside head impulse test evaluates the presence of refixation saccades (RS) as a measure of failing vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) the VOR gain calculated by the video head-impulse test (vHIT) is considered the primary measure for semicircular canal function while the role RS is still under evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the benefit of various RS characteristics towards the diagnosis of the left horizontal semicircular function by vHIT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The vHIT recordings of 40 patients with left sided horizontal VOR gains <0.8 were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of RS. The study groups included 20 patients with a final diagnosis of left horizontal semicircular canal dysfunction and 20 patients for whom vestibular dysfunction was ruled out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gain values > 0.72 were found in all patients with no vestibular disease, and in 4 (20%) patients having vestibulopathy. Significantly higher average left-sided RS velocity and frequency were found among the vestibular patients. VOR gain < 0.72 was found to be highly specific for the diagnosis of vestibular dysfunction. However, for gain values in the range of 0.72-0.79 the presence of RS with frequency > 80% improved vHIT sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although VOR gain<0.8 is considered to reflect dysfunction, a significant false positive rate for left-sided horizontal vHIT was found for gains in the range of 0.72-0.79. The presence of RS with frequency >80% could improve vHIT diagnostic accuracy in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12965,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"162 7","pages":"428-433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: While the bedside head impulse test evaluates the presence of refixation saccades (RS) as a measure of failing vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) the VOR gain calculated by the video head-impulse test (vHIT) is considered the primary measure for semicircular canal function while the role RS is still under evaluation.
Aims: To evaluate the benefit of various RS characteristics towards the diagnosis of the left horizontal semicircular function by vHIT.
Methods: The vHIT recordings of 40 patients with left sided horizontal VOR gains <0.8 were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of RS. The study groups included 20 patients with a final diagnosis of left horizontal semicircular canal dysfunction and 20 patients for whom vestibular dysfunction was ruled out.
Results: Gain values > 0.72 were found in all patients with no vestibular disease, and in 4 (20%) patients having vestibulopathy. Significantly higher average left-sided RS velocity and frequency were found among the vestibular patients. VOR gain < 0.72 was found to be highly specific for the diagnosis of vestibular dysfunction. However, for gain values in the range of 0.72-0.79 the presence of RS with frequency > 80% improved vHIT sensitivity.
Conclusions: Although VOR gain<0.8 is considered to reflect dysfunction, a significant false positive rate for left-sided horizontal vHIT was found for gains in the range of 0.72-0.79. The presence of RS with frequency >80% could improve vHIT diagnostic accuracy in these patients.