The Association of Personal Neglect with Motor, Activities of Daily Living, and Participation Outcomes after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Elissa Embrechts, Renata Loureiro-Chaves, Tanja C W Nijboer, Christophe Lafosse, Steven Truijen, Wim Saeys
{"title":"The Association of Personal Neglect with Motor, Activities of Daily Living, and Participation Outcomes after Stroke: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Elissa Embrechts, Renata Loureiro-Chaves, Tanja C W Nijboer, Christophe Lafosse, Steven Truijen, Wim Saeys","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acad063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its potential clinical impact, the association of personal neglect (PN) with motor, activities of daily living (ADL), and participation outcomes after stroke is not well-understood. This first-ever systematic review on the topic therefore evaluates this association, taking into account suggested subtypes of PN, including body representation neglect, somatosensory neglect, motor neglect, and premotor neglect. A systematic literature search was conducted on February 17, 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PubPsych, and PsycArticles databases. The study adheres to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and its protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187460). Eleven observational studies were included, gathering 1,400 individuals after stroke (429 showed PN). Results show that individuals with body representation neglect after stroke have significantly decreased movement control and motor strength, lower functional mobility, and ADL independency compared with those without body representation neglect after stroke. Individuals with motor neglect after stroke showed worse motor function and spasticity than to those without motor neglect after stroke. Nonspecified PN (i.e., PN evaluated with an outcome measure that does not allow subcategorization) was related to worse lateropulsion with pushing, longer length of stay and greater odds of being discharged to somewhere other than home. No study evaluated somatosensory and premotor neglect. This review highlights the limited research in this area and emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive PN assessment. However, currently available assessment tools show limited ability to accurately diagnose PN subtypes and future research should prioritize the development of comprehensive diagnostic test batteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"249-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its potential clinical impact, the association of personal neglect (PN) with motor, activities of daily living (ADL), and participation outcomes after stroke is not well-understood. This first-ever systematic review on the topic therefore evaluates this association, taking into account suggested subtypes of PN, including body representation neglect, somatosensory neglect, motor neglect, and premotor neglect. A systematic literature search was conducted on February 17, 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PubPsych, and PsycArticles databases. The study adheres to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and its protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187460). Eleven observational studies were included, gathering 1,400 individuals after stroke (429 showed PN). Results show that individuals with body representation neglect after stroke have significantly decreased movement control and motor strength, lower functional mobility, and ADL independency compared with those without body representation neglect after stroke. Individuals with motor neglect after stroke showed worse motor function and spasticity than to those without motor neglect after stroke. Nonspecified PN (i.e., PN evaluated with an outcome measure that does not allow subcategorization) was related to worse lateropulsion with pushing, longer length of stay and greater odds of being discharged to somewhere other than home. No study evaluated somatosensory and premotor neglect. This review highlights the limited research in this area and emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive PN assessment. However, currently available assessment tools show limited ability to accurately diagnose PN subtypes and future research should prioritize the development of comprehensive diagnostic test batteries.

中风后个人忽视与运动、日常生活活动和参与结果的关系:系统回顾
尽管个人忽视(PN)具有潜在的临床影响,但人们对其与中风后运动、日常生活活动(ADL)和参与结果之间的关系还不甚了解。因此,本研究首次就这一主题进行了系统性综述,评估了这种关联性,并考虑到了个人忽视的亚型,包括身体表象忽视、躯体感觉忽视、运动忽视和运动前忽视。本研究于 2023 年 2 月 17 日在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、PubPsych 和 PsycArticles 数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。该研究遵循《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,其研究方案已在 PROSPERO 上注册(CRD42020187460)。该研究共纳入了 11 项观察性研究,收集了 1,400 名中风后患者(其中 429 人表现为 PN)。结果表明,与没有肢体表现忽视的患者相比,脑卒中后肢体表现忽视患者的运动控制能力和运动力量明显下降,功能活动能力和ADL独立性也较低。中风后运动神经元缺失患者的运动功能和痉挛程度比没有运动神经元缺失的患者更差。未指定的 PN(即用不允许进行细分的结果测量来评估的 PN)与推拿时的后期瘫痪、住院时间更长以及出院到家庭以外的其他地方的几率更大有关。没有研究对体感忽视和运动前忽视进行评估。这篇综述强调了这一领域研究的局限性,并强调了进行更全面的 PN 评估的必要性。然而,目前可用的评估工具在准确诊断 PN 亚型方面能力有限,未来的研究应优先开发全面的诊断测试工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信