Emotional expression in human odour.

IF 2.2 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
S Craig Roberts, Jitka Třebická Fialová, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Ben Langford, Piotr Sorokowski, Vít Třebický, Jan Havlíček
{"title":"Emotional expression in human odour.","authors":"S Craig Roberts,&nbsp;Jitka Třebická Fialová,&nbsp;Agnieszka Sorokowska,&nbsp;Ben Langford,&nbsp;Piotr Sorokowski,&nbsp;Vít Třebický,&nbsp;Jan Havlíček","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2022.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent work has demonstrated that human body odour alters with changing emotional state and that emotionally laden odours can affect the physiology and behaviour of people exposed to them. Here we review these discoveries, which we believe add to a growing recognition that the human sense of smell and its potential role in social interactions have been underappreciated. However, we also critically evaluate the current evidence, with a particular focus on methodology and the interpretation of emotional odour studies. We argue that while the evidence convincingly indicates that humans retain a capacity for olfactory communication of emotion, the extent to which this occurs in ordinary social interaction remains an open question. Future studies should place fewer restrictions on participant selection and lifestyle and adopt more realistic experimental designs. We also need to devote more consideration to underlying mechanisms and to recognise the constraints that these may place on effective communication. Finally, we outline some promising approaches to address these issues, and raise some broader theoretical questions that such approaches may help us to answer.</p>","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"4 ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426192/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that human body odour alters with changing emotional state and that emotionally laden odours can affect the physiology and behaviour of people exposed to them. Here we review these discoveries, which we believe add to a growing recognition that the human sense of smell and its potential role in social interactions have been underappreciated. However, we also critically evaluate the current evidence, with a particular focus on methodology and the interpretation of emotional odour studies. We argue that while the evidence convincingly indicates that humans retain a capacity for olfactory communication of emotion, the extent to which this occurs in ordinary social interaction remains an open question. Future studies should place fewer restrictions on participant selection and lifestyle and adopt more realistic experimental designs. We also need to devote more consideration to underlying mechanisms and to recognise the constraints that these may place on effective communication. Finally, we outline some promising approaches to address these issues, and raise some broader theoretical questions that such approaches may help us to answer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人类气味中的情感表达。
最近的研究表明,人的体味会随着情绪状态的变化而改变,而充满情绪的气味会影响接触这些气味的人的生理和行为。在这里,我们回顾了这些发现,我们认为这些发现增加了人们对人类嗅觉及其在社会互动中的潜在作用一直被低估的认识。然而,我们也批判性地评估当前的证据,特别关注方法和情绪气味研究的解释。我们认为,虽然证据令人信服地表明,人类保留了一种嗅觉交流情感的能力,但这种能力在普通社会互动中发生的程度仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。未来的研究应该减少对参与者选择和生活方式的限制,采用更现实的实验设计。我们还需要更多地考虑潜在机制,并认识到这些机制可能对有效沟通造成的制约。最后,我们概述了一些有希望的方法来解决这些问题,并提出了一些更广泛的理论问题,这些方法可以帮助我们回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信