Five-year radiological findings from a randomized controlled trial of four periodontitis treatment strategies

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jon Olav Kubberød, Gerald Ruiner Torgersen, Per Gjermo, Vibeke Baelum, Hans R. Preus
{"title":"Five-year radiological findings from a randomized controlled trial of four periodontitis treatment strategies","authors":"Jon Olav Kubberød,&nbsp;Gerald Ruiner Torgersen,&nbsp;Per Gjermo,&nbsp;Vibeke Baelum,&nbsp;Hans R. Preus","doi":"10.1111/eos.12949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiographic findings from long-term studies of periodontitis treatment have rarely been reported. Although bone destruction is a prominent feature of periodontitis, the long-term effect on alveolar bone levels of different treatment strategies, with or without adjunctive metronidazole (MTZ), has not been reported. We investigated the 5-year radiographic outcome of therapy in patient groups treated with conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) or same-day full-mouth disinfection (FDIS), with or without adjunctive MTZ. Following a 3-month oral hygiene phase, 184 periodontitis patients were randomly allocated to one of four treatment regimens: (i) FDIS+MTZ; (ii) FDIS+placebo; (iii) SRP+MTZ; or (iv) SRP+placebo. Following active treatment, patients received biannual maintenance. In total, 161 patients (87.5%) completed the 5-year follow-up examination, at which the radiographic bone level (RBL), clinical attachment level, probing pocket depth, presence of plaque, and bleeding were recorded again. At the 5-year follow up examination, minor radiological bone loss was observed in the intervention groups FDIS+placebo, SRP+MTZ, and SRP+placebo; by contrast, the FDIS+MTZ group did not show any change in RBL. Full-mouth disinfection did not generally perform better than conventional SRP performed over a period of 2 to 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiographic findings from long-term studies of periodontitis treatment have rarely been reported. Although bone destruction is a prominent feature of periodontitis, the long-term effect on alveolar bone levels of different treatment strategies, with or without adjunctive metronidazole (MTZ), has not been reported. We investigated the 5-year radiographic outcome of therapy in patient groups treated with conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) or same-day full-mouth disinfection (FDIS), with or without adjunctive MTZ. Following a 3-month oral hygiene phase, 184 periodontitis patients were randomly allocated to one of four treatment regimens: (i) FDIS+MTZ; (ii) FDIS+placebo; (iii) SRP+MTZ; or (iv) SRP+placebo. Following active treatment, patients received biannual maintenance. In total, 161 patients (87.5%) completed the 5-year follow-up examination, at which the radiographic bone level (RBL), clinical attachment level, probing pocket depth, presence of plaque, and bleeding were recorded again. At the 5-year follow up examination, minor radiological bone loss was observed in the intervention groups FDIS+placebo, SRP+MTZ, and SRP+placebo; by contrast, the FDIS+MTZ group did not show any change in RBL. Full-mouth disinfection did not generally perform better than conventional SRP performed over a period of 2 to 4 weeks.

Abstract Image

四种牙周炎治疗策略的随机对照试验的五年放射学结果。
长期牙周炎治疗研究的放射学结果很少报道。尽管骨破坏是牙周炎的一个显著特征,但不同治疗策略,无论是否使用甲硝唑(MTZ),对牙槽骨水平的长期影响尚未报道。我们研究了在使用或不使用辅助MTZ的情况下,使用常规洁治和牙根刨削(SRP)或当天全口消毒(FDIS)治疗的患者组的5年放射治疗结果。经过3个月的口腔卫生阶段,184名牙周炎患者被随机分配到四种治疗方案之一:(i)FDIS+MTZ;(ii)FDIS+安慰剂;(iii)SRP+MTZ;或(iv)SRP+安慰剂。在积极治疗后,患者接受了两年一次的维持治疗。总共有161名患者(87.5%)完成了5年的随访检查,再次记录了放射学骨水平(RBL)、临床附着水平、探测袋深度、斑块的存在和出血。在5年的随访检查中,干预组FDIS+安慰剂、SRP+MTZ和SRP+安慰剂观察到轻微的放射学骨丢失;相比之下,FDIS+MTZ组的RBL没有任何变化。在2-4周的时间里,全口消毒通常不会比传统SRP表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信