The use of the brief symptom inventory among youth living with HIV: a scoping review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Natasha Richmond, Alyssa Steinbaum, Nicholas Tarantino, Nidhi Bhaskar, Laura Whiteley, Jacob J van den Berg
{"title":"The use of the brief symptom inventory among youth living with HIV: a scoping review.","authors":"Natasha Richmond,&nbsp;Alyssa Steinbaum,&nbsp;Nicholas Tarantino,&nbsp;Nidhi Bhaskar,&nbsp;Laura Whiteley,&nbsp;Jacob J van den Berg","doi":"10.24875/AIDSRev.22000016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The brief symptom inventory (BSI), a 53-item measure that assesses psychological distress, is a popular tool for measuring mental health symptoms among youth living with HIV (YLH) in the United States (US); however, it has been used inconsistently with this population. This scoping review summarizes discrepancies in the use of the BSI to identify opportunities to improve systematism and make recommendations for clinicians and researchers, and highlights correlates of psychological distress among YLH as measured by the BSI. Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, and CENTRAL. Eligible studies that assessed psychological distress using the BSI among YLH, were conducted in the US, and were written in English. Of the 237 articles identified, 57 were selected for inclusion. Studies investigated associations between BSI scores and several variables, including pre- versus post-highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, ART adherence, sexual risk behavior, substance use, stigma, social support, self-efficacy, mode of HIV infection, and sexual orientation. There was variation in BSI elements used as outcome measures, sample age ranges, and reporting of mean scores and cutoff t-scores. 89.5% (n = 51) of studies did not report which BSI norms were used in their data analysis, and 68.4% of studies (n = 39) did not report the cut-off t-score value used. Variability in study objectives restricted this study to a scoping review rather than a meta-analysis. Generalizability to non-US settings is another limitation. More consistency in how the BSI is used among YLH is needed to accurately identify distress among YLH and provide tailored interventions to address their unique challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":7685,"journal":{"name":"AIDS reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/AIDSRev.22000016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brief symptom inventory (BSI), a 53-item measure that assesses psychological distress, is a popular tool for measuring mental health symptoms among youth living with HIV (YLH) in the United States (US); however, it has been used inconsistently with this population. This scoping review summarizes discrepancies in the use of the BSI to identify opportunities to improve systematism and make recommendations for clinicians and researchers, and highlights correlates of psychological distress among YLH as measured by the BSI. Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, and CENTRAL. Eligible studies that assessed psychological distress using the BSI among YLH, were conducted in the US, and were written in English. Of the 237 articles identified, 57 were selected for inclusion. Studies investigated associations between BSI scores and several variables, including pre- versus post-highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, ART adherence, sexual risk behavior, substance use, stigma, social support, self-efficacy, mode of HIV infection, and sexual orientation. There was variation in BSI elements used as outcome measures, sample age ranges, and reporting of mean scores and cutoff t-scores. 89.5% (n = 51) of studies did not report which BSI norms were used in their data analysis, and 68.4% of studies (n = 39) did not report the cut-off t-score value used. Variability in study objectives restricted this study to a scoping review rather than a meta-analysis. Generalizability to non-US settings is another limitation. More consistency in how the BSI is used among YLH is needed to accurately identify distress among YLH and provide tailored interventions to address their unique challenges.

在青年艾滋病病毒感染者中使用简短症状量表:范围审查。
简要症状量表(BSI)是一种评估心理困扰的53项测量方法,是美国(US)衡量青少年艾滋病毒感染者(YLH)心理健康症状的流行工具;然而,它在这一人群中的使用并不一致。本综述总结了BSI使用中的差异,以确定改善系统性的机会,并为临床医生和研究人员提出建议,并强调了由BSI测量的YLH心理困扰的相关性。检索的数据库包括PsycINFO、PubMed和CENTRAL。使用BSI评估YLH心理困扰的合格研究在美国进行,并以英语撰写。在确定的237篇文章中,57篇入选。研究调查了BSI评分与几个变量之间的关系,包括高活性抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)前后的时间、ART依从性、性风险行为、物质使用、耻辱、社会支持、自我效能感、HIV感染模式和性取向。作为结果测量指标的BSI元素、样本年龄范围以及平均得分和截止t得分的报告存在差异。89.5% (n = 51)的研究没有报告在其数据分析中使用了哪种BSI规范,68.4% (n = 39)的研究没有报告使用的截断t评分值。研究目标的可变性限制了本研究的范围审查,而不是荟萃分析。非美国设置的普遍性是另一个限制。在青少年中使用BSI的方式需要更加一致,以准确地识别青少年中的痛苦,并提供量身定制的干预措施,以解决他们独特的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS reviews
AIDS reviews 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Reviews publishes papers reporting original scientific, clinical, epidemiologic and social research which contribute to the overall knowledge of the field of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and human retrovirology. Currently, the Journal publishes review articles (usually by invitation, but spontaneous submitted articles will also be considered). Manuscripts submitted to AIDS Reviews will be accepted on the understanding that the authors have not submitted the paper to another journal or published the material elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信