Nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/17571774231159383
Tess F Asgill, Douglas Stupart
{"title":"Nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Tess F Asgill,&nbsp;Douglas Stupart","doi":"10.1177/17571774231159383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of infection control interventions were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the spread of this virus.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if these interventions were associated with reduced nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational data were obtained from the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) based on admitted hospital patients in two 6-month timeframes representing pandemic and pre-pandemic hospital practices. Data were collected for surgical site infections, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia, <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant reduction in the rates of <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia (0.74 infections/10, 000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.53/10,000 bed days in the pandemic period [rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90]; <i>p</i> = .003) and in <i>C. difficile</i> infections (2.2 infections/10,000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.86/10 000 bed days in the pandemic era [rate ratio 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.67-0.86]; <i>p</i> <.001). There was no change in the overall rate of surgical site infections or central line-associated infections however.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The increased emphasis on infection control and prevention strategies during the pandemic period was associated with reduced transmission of <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>C. difficile</i> infections within hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974379/pdf/10.1177_17571774231159383.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774231159383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A number of infection control interventions were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the spread of this virus.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if these interventions were associated with reduced nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: Observational data were obtained from the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) based on admitted hospital patients in two 6-month timeframes representing pandemic and pre-pandemic hospital practices. Data were collected for surgical site infections, Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infections.

Results: There was a significant reduction in the rates of S. aureus bacteraemia (0.74 infections/10, 000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.53/10,000 bed days in the pandemic period [rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90]; p = .003) and in C. difficile infections (2.2 infections/10,000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.86/10 000 bed days in the pandemic era [rate ratio 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.67-0.86]; p <.001). There was no change in the overall rate of surgical site infections or central line-associated infections however.

Discussion: The increased emphasis on infection control and prevention strategies during the pandemic period was associated with reduced transmission of S. aureus and C. difficile infections within hospitals.

分享
查看原文
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,维多利亚州的医院细菌感染有所下降。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间实施了一些感染控制干预措施,以减少该病毒的传播。目的:本研究的目的是确定这些干预措施是否与减少澳大利亚维多利亚州的医院细菌感染有关。方法:观察性数据来自维多利亚卫生保健相关感染监测系统(VICNISS),基于代表大流行和大流行前医院实践的两个6个月时间框架的住院患者。收集手术部位感染、金黄色葡萄球菌血症、艰难梭菌感染和中央静脉相关血流感染的数据。结果:金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症发生率显著降低(大流行前0.74例感染/1万床日,大流行期0.53例/1万床日)[比率比0.72,95% CI 0.57-0.90];p = 0.003)和艰难梭菌感染(大流行前2.2例感染/10,000床日,大流行时期0.86例感染/10,000床日[比率比0.76,95% C.I. 0.67-0.86];p讨论:大流行期间对感染控制和预防策略的日益重视与金黄色葡萄球菌和艰难梭菌感染在医院内的传播减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信