{"title":"Nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Tess F Asgill, Douglas Stupart","doi":"10.1177/17571774231159383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of infection control interventions were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the spread of this virus.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if these interventions were associated with reduced nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational data were obtained from the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) based on admitted hospital patients in two 6-month timeframes representing pandemic and pre-pandemic hospital practices. Data were collected for surgical site infections, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia, <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant reduction in the rates of <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia (0.74 infections/10, 000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.53/10,000 bed days in the pandemic period [rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90]; <i>p</i> = .003) and in <i>C. difficile</i> infections (2.2 infections/10,000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.86/10 000 bed days in the pandemic era [rate ratio 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.67-0.86]; <i>p</i> <.001). There was no change in the overall rate of surgical site infections or central line-associated infections however.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The increased emphasis on infection control and prevention strategies during the pandemic period was associated with reduced transmission of <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>C. difficile</i> infections within hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"24 4","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974379/pdf/10.1177_17571774231159383.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774231159383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: A number of infection control interventions were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the spread of this virus.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if these interventions were associated with reduced nosocomial bacterial infections in Victoria, Australia.
Methods: Observational data were obtained from the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) based on admitted hospital patients in two 6-month timeframes representing pandemic and pre-pandemic hospital practices. Data were collected for surgical site infections, Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infections.
Results: There was a significant reduction in the rates of S. aureus bacteraemia (0.74 infections/10, 000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.53/10,000 bed days in the pandemic period [rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90]; p = .003) and in C. difficile infections (2.2 infections/10,000 bed days pre-pandemic vs. 0.86/10 000 bed days in the pandemic era [rate ratio 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.67-0.86]; p <.001). There was no change in the overall rate of surgical site infections or central line-associated infections however.
Discussion: The increased emphasis on infection control and prevention strategies during the pandemic period was associated with reduced transmission of S. aureus and C. difficile infections within hospitals.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects