Clinical Validation of Novel Digital Measures: Statistical Methods for Reliability Evaluation.

Q1 Computer Science
Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2023-08-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000531054
Bohdana Ratitch, Andrew Trigg, Madhurima Majumder, Vanja Vlajnic, Nicole Rethemeier, Richard Nkulikiyinka
{"title":"Clinical Validation of Novel Digital Measures: Statistical Methods for Reliability Evaluation.","authors":"Bohdana Ratitch, Andrew Trigg, Madhurima Majumder, Vanja Vlajnic, Nicole Rethemeier, Richard Nkulikiyinka","doi":"10.1159/000531054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of reliability is one of the key components of the validation process designed to demonstrate that a novel clinical measure assessed by a digital health technology tool is fit-for-purpose in clinical research, care, and decision-making. Reliability assessment contributes to characterization of the signal-to-noise ratio and measurement error and is the first indicator of potential usefulness of the proposed clinical measure.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Methodologies for reliability analyses are scattered across literature on validation of PROs, wet biomarkers, etc., yet are equally useful for digital clinical measures. We review a general modeling framework and statistical metrics typically used for reliability assessments as part of the clinical validation. We also present methods for the assessment of agreement and measurement error, alongside modified approaches for categorical measures. We illustrate the discussed techniques using physical activity data from a wearable device with an accelerometer sensor collected in clinical trial participants.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This paper provides statisticians and data scientists, involved in development and validation of novel digital clinical measures, an overview of the statistical methodologies and analytical tools for reliability assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"7 1","pages":"74-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/b8/dib-2023-0007-0001-531054.PMC10425717.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment of reliability is one of the key components of the validation process designed to demonstrate that a novel clinical measure assessed by a digital health technology tool is fit-for-purpose in clinical research, care, and decision-making. Reliability assessment contributes to characterization of the signal-to-noise ratio and measurement error and is the first indicator of potential usefulness of the proposed clinical measure.

Summary: Methodologies for reliability analyses are scattered across literature on validation of PROs, wet biomarkers, etc., yet are equally useful for digital clinical measures. We review a general modeling framework and statistical metrics typically used for reliability assessments as part of the clinical validation. We also present methods for the assessment of agreement and measurement error, alongside modified approaches for categorical measures. We illustrate the discussed techniques using physical activity data from a wearable device with an accelerometer sensor collected in clinical trial participants.

Key messages: This paper provides statisticians and data scientists, involved in development and validation of novel digital clinical measures, an overview of the statistical methodologies and analytical tools for reliability assessment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新型数字测量的临床验证:可靠性评估统计方法。
背景:可靠性评估是验证过程的关键组成部分之一,旨在证明由数字医疗技术工具评估的新型临床测量方法适合临床研究、护理和决策。可靠性评估有助于确定信噪比和测量误差的特征,是衡量拟议临床指标潜在有用性的首要指标。摘要:可靠性分析方法散见于有关PROs、湿生物标记物等验证的文献中,但对数字临床指标同样有用。我们回顾了作为临床验证的一部分,通常用于可靠性评估的一般建模框架和统计指标。我们还介绍了评估一致性和测量误差的方法,以及针对分类测量的改进方法。我们使用从临床试验参与者身上采集的带有加速度传感器的可穿戴设备的体力活动数据来说明所讨论的技术:本文为参与开发和验证新型数字临床测量的统计学家和数据科学家提供了可靠性评估的统计方法和分析工具概览。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信