[Microbiological methods for identification of the etiological agents of bloodstream infections with focus on the T2Bacteria Panel].

Q3 Medicine
Lucie Cíchová, Milena Antušková, Olga Džupová
{"title":"[Microbiological methods for identification of the etiological agents of bloodstream infections with focus on the T2Bacteria Panel].","authors":"Lucie Cíchová,&nbsp;Milena Antušková,&nbsp;Olga Džupová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood culture is the gold standard method for identifying the etiological agents of bloodstream infections. A relatively low sensitivity and a long time to detection are its main disadvantages, resulting in delayed administration of pathogen-specific antibiotic therapy and the need to initiate empiric treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such an approach negatively affects overall treatment outcomes and contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance. Research in recent years has allowed the introduction of methods for rapid identification of pathogenic microbes from positive blood cultures, as well as methods for direct detection of bacteria and fungi from whole blood without the need for prior culture. Direct detection tests from whole blood have dramatically reduced the time to identify the causative pathogen of a bloodstream infection, but they also have their limitations. Methods that combine PCR and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging appear promising. This article provides an overview of diagnostic tests and a detailed description of the T2Bacteria Panel, its advantages and disadvantages based on prospective observational studies and review articles. Future implementation of these methods in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections and potentially localized infections could have a positive impact on the early administration of pathogen-specific antimicrobial therapy and subsequently on overall treatment outcomes, as well as on reducing the spread of antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17909,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi","volume":"29 1","pages":"20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood culture is the gold standard method for identifying the etiological agents of bloodstream infections. A relatively low sensitivity and a long time to detection are its main disadvantages, resulting in delayed administration of pathogen-specific antibiotic therapy and the need to initiate empiric treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such an approach negatively affects overall treatment outcomes and contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance. Research in recent years has allowed the introduction of methods for rapid identification of pathogenic microbes from positive blood cultures, as well as methods for direct detection of bacteria and fungi from whole blood without the need for prior culture. Direct detection tests from whole blood have dramatically reduced the time to identify the causative pathogen of a bloodstream infection, but they also have their limitations. Methods that combine PCR and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging appear promising. This article provides an overview of diagnostic tests and a detailed description of the T2Bacteria Panel, its advantages and disadvantages based on prospective observational studies and review articles. Future implementation of these methods in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections and potentially localized infections could have a positive impact on the early administration of pathogen-specific antimicrobial therapy and subsequently on overall treatment outcomes, as well as on reducing the spread of antibiotic resistance.

[血流感染病原鉴定的微生物学方法,重点是T2Bacteria Panel]。
血培养是鉴别血流感染病原的金标准方法。相对较低的敏感性和较长的检测时间是其主要缺点,导致给予病原体特异性抗生素治疗延迟,需要开始使用广谱抗生素进行经验性治疗。这种方法对总体治疗结果产生负面影响,并有助于抗生素耐药性的传播。近年来的研究已经允许引入从阳性血液培养物中快速鉴定病原微生物的方法,以及不需要事先培养就可以从全血中直接检测细菌和真菌的方法。全血的直接检测测试大大缩短了识别血液感染的致病病原体的时间,但它们也有其局限性。结合PCR和t2加权磁共振成像的方法似乎很有前景。本文基于前瞻性观察性研究和综述性文章,概述了诊断测试,并详细描述了T2Bacteria小组及其优缺点。未来在血液感染和潜在局部感染诊断中实施这些方法,可能对早期给予病原体特异性抗菌药物治疗以及随后的总体治疗结果产生积极影响,并对减少抗生素耐药性的传播产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi
Klinicka mikrobiologie a infekcni lekarstvi Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信