{"title":"Gamma radiation detector selection for CT scanner.","authors":"Kajal Kumari, Mayank Goswami","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three types of gamma radiation detectors associated with distributed electronics namely, NaI (Tl), HPGe and LaBr<sub>3</sub>(Ce) are compared primarily focusing on electronic noise and scattering noise. Additionally, detectors of same make, material, size and electronics are also compared. A methodology is proposed to select the most suitable detector for computed tomography (CT) among the available options. Standard deviation parameter is employed to estimate electronic noise without performing CT experiment. Kanpur theorem-1(KT-1) is used to estimate the scattering noise quantitatively after verifying its sensitivity to scattering noise. The impact of scattering noise on CT profiles is evaluated using dice similarity dice coefficient. A good resemblance between KT-1 and dice coefficient is observed. A maximum difference of 56% in scattering noise is observed when five detectors used simultaneously instead of single detector whereas a discrepancy of 85% is observed between different types of radiation detectors. As far as ease of handling, operational and capital cost is concern one has to compromise minimum 12% of accuracy in CT reconstruction if NaI (Tl) detector is used with respect to best alternative available. The proposed methodology can be applied to measurement that require minimal scattering interference data other than CT experiments. The manufacturer can add noise level of detector as a characteristic parameter in the data sheet.</p>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.07.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Three types of gamma radiation detectors associated with distributed electronics namely, NaI (Tl), HPGe and LaBr3(Ce) are compared primarily focusing on electronic noise and scattering noise. Additionally, detectors of same make, material, size and electronics are also compared. A methodology is proposed to select the most suitable detector for computed tomography (CT) among the available options. Standard deviation parameter is employed to estimate electronic noise without performing CT experiment. Kanpur theorem-1(KT-1) is used to estimate the scattering noise quantitatively after verifying its sensitivity to scattering noise. The impact of scattering noise on CT profiles is evaluated using dice similarity dice coefficient. A good resemblance between KT-1 and dice coefficient is observed. A maximum difference of 56% in scattering noise is observed when five detectors used simultaneously instead of single detector whereas a discrepancy of 85% is observed between different types of radiation detectors. As far as ease of handling, operational and capital cost is concern one has to compromise minimum 12% of accuracy in CT reconstruction if NaI (Tl) detector is used with respect to best alternative available. The proposed methodology can be applied to measurement that require minimal scattering interference data other than CT experiments. The manufacturer can add noise level of detector as a characteristic parameter in the data sheet.
期刊介绍:
Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing.
Focuses of the articles are:
-Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine
-Dosimetry and radiation protection
-Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance
-Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography
-Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays
-Electronic processing of biosignals
-Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics
In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.