Transcranial direct current stimulation of 3 cortical targets is no more effective than placebo as treatment for fibromyalgia: a double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Noelia Samartin-Veiga, Marina Pidal-Miranda, Alberto J González-Villar, Claire Bradley, Luis Garcia-Larrea, Anthony T O'Brien, María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation of 3 cortical targets is no more effective than placebo as treatment for fibromyalgia: a double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Noelia Samartin-Veiga,&nbsp;Marina Pidal-Miranda,&nbsp;Alberto J González-Villar,&nbsp;Claire Bradley,&nbsp;Luis Garcia-Larrea,&nbsp;Anthony T O'Brien,&nbsp;María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex seem to improve pain and other symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM), although the evidence on the effectiveness of tDCS and the optimal stimulation target is not robust enough. Our main objective was to establish the optimal area of stimulation, comparing the 2 classical targets and a novel pain-related area, the operculo-insular cortex, in a sham-controlled trial. Using a double-blind design, we randomly assigned 130 women with FM to 4 treatment groups (M1, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, operculo-insular cortex, and sham), each receiving fifteen 20-minute sessions of 2 mA anodal tDCS over the left hemisphere. Our primary outcome was pain intensity. The secondary outcomes were the other core symptoms of FM (fatigue, mood, cognitive and sleep disorders, and hyperalgesia measured by the pressure pain threshold). We performed the assessment at 3 time points (before, immediately after treatment, and at 6 months follow-up). The linear mixed-model analysis of variances showed significant treatment effects across time for clinical pain and for fatigue, cognitive and sleep disturbances, and experimental pain, irrespective of the group. In mood, the 3 active tDCS groups showed a significantly larger improvement in anxiety and depression than sham. Our findings provide evidence of a placebo effect, support the use of tDCS for the treatment of affective symptoms, and challenge the effectiveness of tDCS as treatment of FM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"163 7","pages":"e850-e861"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex seem to improve pain and other symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM), although the evidence on the effectiveness of tDCS and the optimal stimulation target is not robust enough. Our main objective was to establish the optimal area of stimulation, comparing the 2 classical targets and a novel pain-related area, the operculo-insular cortex, in a sham-controlled trial. Using a double-blind design, we randomly assigned 130 women with FM to 4 treatment groups (M1, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, operculo-insular cortex, and sham), each receiving fifteen 20-minute sessions of 2 mA anodal tDCS over the left hemisphere. Our primary outcome was pain intensity. The secondary outcomes were the other core symptoms of FM (fatigue, mood, cognitive and sleep disorders, and hyperalgesia measured by the pressure pain threshold). We performed the assessment at 3 time points (before, immediately after treatment, and at 6 months follow-up). The linear mixed-model analysis of variances showed significant treatment effects across time for clinical pain and for fatigue, cognitive and sleep disturbances, and experimental pain, irrespective of the group. In mood, the 3 active tDCS groups showed a significantly larger improvement in anxiety and depression than sham. Our findings provide evidence of a placebo effect, support the use of tDCS for the treatment of affective symptoms, and challenge the effectiveness of tDCS as treatment of FM.

经颅直流电刺激3个皮质靶点治疗纤维肌痛并不比安慰剂更有效:一项双盲假对照临床试验
摘要:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对初级运动皮质(M1)和背外侧前额叶皮质似乎可以改善纤维肌痛(FM)的疼痛和其他症状,尽管关于tDCS的有效性和最佳刺激靶点的证据不够充分。我们的主要目的是建立最佳的刺激区域,比较两个经典的目标和一个新的疼痛相关区域,岛盖皮层,在一个假对照试验中。采用双盲设计,我们将130名患有FM的女性随机分配到4个治疗组(M1、背外侧前额叶皮层、岛盖皮层和假手术),每个治疗组接受15次20分钟的2 mA左半球淋巴结tDCS治疗。我们的主要结果是疼痛强度。次要结局是FM的其他核心症状(疲劳、情绪、认知和睡眠障碍,以及通过压痛阈测量的痛觉过敏)。我们在3个时间点(治疗前、治疗后和随访6个月)进行评估。方差的线性混合模型分析显示,无论分组如何,临床疼痛、疲劳、认知和睡眠障碍以及实验性疼痛的治疗效果都很显著。在情绪方面,3个活跃tDCS组在焦虑和抑郁方面的改善明显大于假组。我们的研究结果提供了安慰剂效应的证据,支持使用tDCS治疗情感性症状,并挑战tDCS治疗FM的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书