Before, During, and After: An Examination of the Pre-Task Planning and Post-Task Revising Practices of Adults with Low Literacy and their Effect on the Quality of Written Compositions.

Kathryn A Tremblay, Katherine S Binder, Anneli Chuy
{"title":"Before, During, and After: An Examination of the Pre-Task Planning and Post-Task Revising Practices of Adults with Low Literacy and their Effect on the Quality of Written Compositions.","authors":"Kathryn A Tremblay,&nbsp;Katherine S Binder,&nbsp;Anneli Chuy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to examine the pre-task planning and post-task revising practices of adults with low literacy and how those practices affect overall writing quality. Seventy-six adults with low literacy composed essays in response to a prompt and were given time for pre-task planning and post-task revising. Results showed that participants with higher planning skills were able to utilize planning and revising processes to increase the detail included in their compositions while potentially streamlining the language contained therein. Writers with lower planning skills, in contrast, focused on lower-level aspects of writing (e.g., word choice) and were unable to make use of the more demanding processes of planning and revising to improve their compositions. These findings suggest a hierarchical development of writing skills and the possibility of sacrifices in certain areas of the writing process as writers focus on other areas. Practical implications for practitioners are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research and practice for adult literacy, secondary, and basic education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427111/pdf/nihms-1823417.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research and practice for adult literacy, secondary, and basic education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to examine the pre-task planning and post-task revising practices of adults with low literacy and how those practices affect overall writing quality. Seventy-six adults with low literacy composed essays in response to a prompt and were given time for pre-task planning and post-task revising. Results showed that participants with higher planning skills were able to utilize planning and revising processes to increase the detail included in their compositions while potentially streamlining the language contained therein. Writers with lower planning skills, in contrast, focused on lower-level aspects of writing (e.g., word choice) and were unable to make use of the more demanding processes of planning and revising to improve their compositions. These findings suggest a hierarchical development of writing skills and the possibility of sacrifices in certain areas of the writing process as writers focus on other areas. Practical implications for practitioners are discussed.

前、中、后:低读写成人任务前计划和任务后修改行为及其对作文质量的影响
本研究旨在探讨低读写能力成人的任务前规划和任务后修改行为,以及这些行为对整体写作质量的影响。76名读写能力较低的成年人根据提示写了一篇文章,并给了他们任务前计划和任务后修改的时间。结果表明,具有较高计划技能的参与者能够利用计划和修改过程来增加他们作文中的细节,同时可能简化其中包含的语言。相比之下,计划能力较低的作家专注于较低水平的写作方面(例如,用词),无法利用要求更高的计划和修改过程来改进他们的作文。这些发现表明,写作技能的发展是有层次的,而且作家在专注于其他领域时,可能会在写作过程的某些领域做出牺牲。讨论了实践者的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信