Urologist-perceived barriers and perspectives on the underuse of sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in Canada.

Peter Gariscsak, Gary Gray, Stephen Steele, D Elterman, R Christopher Doiron
{"title":"Urologist-perceived barriers and perspectives on the underuse of sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in Canada.","authors":"Peter Gariscsak, Gary Gray, Stephen Steele, D Elterman, R Christopher Doiron","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An estimated 18% of Canadians have overactive bladder (OAB), with approximately 24% of those reporting difficulty adhering to pharmacotherapy. To date, there has been no investigation into barriers facing sacral neuromodulation (SNM) as treatment for OAB in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Current Canadian Urological Association members were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. Data collected included open-ended and Likert scale responses addressing barriers to referral for SNM. Qualitative analysis used a Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), while quantitative responses are reported using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A response rate of 20.4% (n=142) was obtained. Most respondents believed SNM was underused (n=82, 57.7%) compared to only 6.3% (n=9) who believed it was used adequately. The most commonly cited reasons for not offering SNM were lack of availability (n=85, 59.9%), expertise (n=49, 34.5%), and funding (n=26, 18.3%). Participants were neutral regarding confidence to appropriately recommend SNM to patients (median 3, interquartile range [IQR] 2-4) and were not confident to manage patient care and issues related to SNM devices (median 2, IQR 1-3). On thematic analysis using the TDF, the most prevalent barriers to SNM care were related to infrastructure and resources. A lack of trained experts and lack of knowledge related to SNM use were also commonly identified barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this first study exploring urologist-perceived barriers to SNM referral for medically refractory OAB in Canada, urologists acknowledge that SNM implantation is underused but did not feel confident in recommending SNM appropriately. A lack of trained experts and poor funding were also identified as major barriers to SNM referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":"17 6","pages":"E165-E171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263295/pdf/cuaj-6-e165.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An estimated 18% of Canadians have overactive bladder (OAB), with approximately 24% of those reporting difficulty adhering to pharmacotherapy. To date, there has been no investigation into barriers facing sacral neuromodulation (SNM) as treatment for OAB in Canada.

Methods: Current Canadian Urological Association members were invited to participate in an anonymous survey. Data collected included open-ended and Likert scale responses addressing barriers to referral for SNM. Qualitative analysis used a Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), while quantitative responses are reported using descriptive statistics.

Results: A response rate of 20.4% (n=142) was obtained. Most respondents believed SNM was underused (n=82, 57.7%) compared to only 6.3% (n=9) who believed it was used adequately. The most commonly cited reasons for not offering SNM were lack of availability (n=85, 59.9%), expertise (n=49, 34.5%), and funding (n=26, 18.3%). Participants were neutral regarding confidence to appropriately recommend SNM to patients (median 3, interquartile range [IQR] 2-4) and were not confident to manage patient care and issues related to SNM devices (median 2, IQR 1-3). On thematic analysis using the TDF, the most prevalent barriers to SNM care were related to infrastructure and resources. A lack of trained experts and lack of knowledge related to SNM use were also commonly identified barriers.

Conclusions: In this first study exploring urologist-perceived barriers to SNM referral for medically refractory OAB in Canada, urologists acknowledge that SNM implantation is underused but did not feel confident in recommending SNM appropriately. A lack of trained experts and poor funding were also identified as major barriers to SNM referral.

加拿大泌尿科医生对骶神经调节治疗膀胱过度活动症使用不足的障碍和看法。
导言:据估计,18%的加拿大人患有膀胱过度活动症(OAB),其中约24%的人表示难以坚持药物治疗。迄今为止,加拿大尚未对骶神经调节疗法(SNM)治疗膀胱过度活动症所面临的障碍进行调查:方法:邀请加拿大泌尿协会的现任会员参与匿名调查。收集的数据包括针对骶神经调节术转诊障碍的开放式和李克特量表回答。定性分析采用理论领域框架(TDF),定量回答采用描述性统计:答复率为 20.4%(n=142)。大多数受访者认为 SNM 没有得到充分利用(82 人,占 57.7%),只有 6.3%(9 人)认为 SNM 得到了充分的利用。不提供 SNM 的最常见原因是缺乏可用性(85 人,占 59.9%)、专业知识(49 人,占 34.5%)和资金(26 人,占 18.3%)。参与者对向患者适当推荐 SNM 的信心持中立态度(中位数为 3,四分位数间距 [IQR] 为 2-4),对管理患者护理和 SNM 设备相关问题的信心不足(中位数为 2,四分位数间距 [IQR] 为 1-3)。通过使用 TDF 进行专题分析,SNM 护理最普遍的障碍与基础设施和资源有关。缺乏训练有素的专家和缺乏与 SNM 使用相关的知识也是常见的障碍:这项研究首次探讨了加拿大泌尿科医生在转诊SNM治疗药物难治性OAB时遇到的障碍,研究结果显示,泌尿科医生承认SNM植入术使用不足,但对适当推荐SNM没有信心。缺乏训练有素的专家和资金不足也被认为是SNM转诊的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信