Effectiveness of repetitive influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection among a cohort of health care workers in Portugal.

Susana Sá Silva, Milton Severo, Pedro Norton, André Moreira
{"title":"Effectiveness of repetitive influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection among a cohort of health care workers in Portugal.","authors":"Susana Sá Silva,&nbsp;Milton Severo,&nbsp;Pedro Norton,&nbsp;André Moreira","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccination for influenza has been essential over the years to protect the most vulnerable populations. Moreover, it was recently suggested that influenza vaccination might confer some nonspecific immunity to other viruses and be associated with a lower risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of repetitive influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of health care workers (HCWs). This study was conducted among HCWs at São João University Hospital Center (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal, a tertiary reference hospital for diagnosis and therapy, one of the largest hospitals in the country with approximately 6000 HCWs. We analyzed databases for influenza vaccination conducted between 2012 and 2019 and COVID-19 laboratory testing retrieved from the first and last registered positive COVID test date before HCW's COVID-19 vaccination started. The study outcome was the incidence of the first SARS-CoV-2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Age and sex were considered potential confounders. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate odds ratios. Neither the absolute number nor the proportion of influenza shots influenced the risk of getting infected by SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 0.9-1.06 and 1.17 95% CI: 0.86-1.58, respectively). Similar findings were observed in most cases when the analysis was restricted by year. The findings from our retrospective observational analysis of a HCWs cohort failed to support any protective effect between repetitive influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 4","pages":"e223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/4f/pj9-8-e223.PMC10400066.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination for influenza has been essential over the years to protect the most vulnerable populations. Moreover, it was recently suggested that influenza vaccination might confer some nonspecific immunity to other viruses and be associated with a lower risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of repetitive influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of health care workers (HCWs). This study was conducted among HCWs at São João University Hospital Center (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal, a tertiary reference hospital for diagnosis and therapy, one of the largest hospitals in the country with approximately 6000 HCWs. We analyzed databases for influenza vaccination conducted between 2012 and 2019 and COVID-19 laboratory testing retrieved from the first and last registered positive COVID test date before HCW's COVID-19 vaccination started. The study outcome was the incidence of the first SARS-CoV-2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Age and sex were considered potential confounders. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate odds ratios. Neither the absolute number nor the proportion of influenza shots influenced the risk of getting infected by SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 0.9-1.06 and 1.17 95% CI: 0.86-1.58, respectively). Similar findings were observed in most cases when the analysis was restricted by year. The findings from our retrospective observational analysis of a HCWs cohort failed to support any protective effect between repetitive influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Abstract Image

在葡萄牙一组卫生保健工作者中反复接种预防SARS-CoV-2感染的流感疫苗的有效性
多年来,流感疫苗接种对保护最脆弱人群至关重要。此外,最近有研究表明,流感疫苗接种可能会赋予对其他病毒的一些非特异性免疫力,并与降低2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)发病率和死亡率的风险有关。因此,我们的目的是评估在一组卫生保健工作者(HCWs)中反复接种预防SARS-CoV-2感染的流感疫苗的有效性。这项研究是在葡萄牙波尔图的 o jo大学医院中心(CHUSJ)的卫生保健员中进行的,这是一家三级诊断和治疗参考医院,是该国最大的医院之一,拥有大约6000名卫生保健员。我们分析了2012年至2019年期间进行的流感疫苗接种数据库,以及从HCW开始接种COVID-19疫苗之前首次和最后一次登记的COVID-19检测阳性日期检索的COVID-19实验室检测数据。研究结果是通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确定首次SARS-CoV-2感染的发生率。年龄和性别被认为是潜在的混杂因素。我们使用多变量Cox回归来估计优势比。注射流感疫苗的绝对数量和比例都不影响被SARS-CoV-2感染的风险(校正优势比分别为1.02,95% CI: 0.9-1.06和1.17,95% CI: 0.86-1.58)。当分析受年份限制时,在大多数情况下观察到类似的结果。我们对卫生保健工作者队列的回顾性观察分析结果未能支持重复流感疫苗接种与SARS-CoV-2感染之间的任何保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信