Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Learning & memory Pub Date : 2023-08-08 Print Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.053781.123
Yanfang Xia, Jelena Wehrli, Samuel Gerster, Marijn Kroes, Maxime Houtekamer, Dominik R Bach
{"title":"Measuring human context fear conditioning and retention after consolidation.","authors":"Yanfang Xia, Jelena Wehrli, Samuel Gerster, Marijn Kroes, Maxime Houtekamer, Dominik R Bach","doi":"10.1101/lm.053781.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans, previous work has used startle eyeblink responses (SEBRs), skin conductance responses (SCRs), and verbal reports, but different quantification methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies mandate recall tests several days after acquisition, and it is unclear how to induce and measure context fear memory retention over such a time interval. First, we used a semi-immersive virtual reality paradigm. In two experiments (<i>N</i> = 23 and <i>N</i> = 28), we found successful declarative learning and memory retention over 7 d but no evidence of other conditioned responses. Next, we used a configural fear conditioning paradigm with five static room images as CTXs in two experiments (<i>N</i> = 29 and <i>N</i> = 24). Besides successful declarative learning and memory retention after 7 d, SCR and pupil dilation in response to CTX onset differentiated CTX<sup>+</sup>/CTX<sup>-</sup> during acquisition training, and SEBR and pupil dilation differentiated CTX<sup>+</sup>/CTX<sup>-</sup> during the recall test, with medium to large effect sizes for the most sensitive indices (SEBR: Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.56 and <i>g</i> = 0.69; pupil dilation: Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.99 and <i>g</i> = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that with a configural learning paradigm, context fear memory retention can be demonstrated over 7 d, and we provide robust and replicable measurement methods to this end.</p>","PeriodicalId":18003,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory","volume":"30 7","pages":"139-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053781.123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fear conditioning is a laboratory paradigm commonly used to investigate aversive learning and memory. In context fear conditioning, a configuration of elemental cues (conditioned stimulus [CTX]) predicts an aversive event (unconditioned stimulus [US]). To quantify context fear acquisition in humans, previous work has used startle eyeblink responses (SEBRs), skin conductance responses (SCRs), and verbal reports, but different quantification methods have rarely been compared. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies mandate recall tests several days after acquisition, and it is unclear how to induce and measure context fear memory retention over such a time interval. First, we used a semi-immersive virtual reality paradigm. In two experiments (N = 23 and N = 28), we found successful declarative learning and memory retention over 7 d but no evidence of other conditioned responses. Next, we used a configural fear conditioning paradigm with five static room images as CTXs in two experiments (N = 29 and N = 24). Besides successful declarative learning and memory retention after 7 d, SCR and pupil dilation in response to CTX onset differentiated CTX+/CTX- during acquisition training, and SEBR and pupil dilation differentiated CTX+/CTX- during the recall test, with medium to large effect sizes for the most sensitive indices (SEBR: Hedge's g = 0.56 and g = 0.69; pupil dilation: Hedge's g = 0.99 and g = 0.88). Our results demonstrate that with a configural learning paradigm, context fear memory retention can be demonstrated over 7 d, and we provide robust and replicable measurement methods to this end.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

测量人类环境对巩固后的恐惧条件和保留。
恐惧条件反射是一种实验室范式,通常用于研究厌恶性学习和记忆。在上下文恐惧条件反射中,基本线索的配置(条件刺激[CTX])预测厌恶事件(非条件刺激[US])。为了量化人类的情境恐惧获取,先前的工作使用了惊跳眨眼反应(SEBR)、皮肤电导反应(SCR)和言语报告,但很少比较不同的量化方法。此外,临床前干预研究要求在获得后几天进行回忆测试,目前尚不清楚如何在这样的时间间隔内诱导和测量情境恐惧记忆保持。首先,我们使用了一种半沉浸式虚拟现实范式。在两个实验中(N=23和N=28),我们发现在7天内成功的陈述性学习和记忆保持,但没有其他条件反应的证据。接下来,我们在两个实验(N=29和N=24)中使用了五个静态房间图像作为CTX的结构恐惧条件反射范式。除了7天后成功的陈述性学习和记忆保持外,在获取训练中,SCR和瞳孔扩张对CTX发作的反应区分了CTX+/CTX-,在回忆测试中,SEBR和瞳孔扩张区分了CTX+/CTX-,最敏感指数的效应大小为中到大(SEBR:Hedge的g=0.56和g=0.69;瞳孔扩张:Hedge的g=0.99和g=0.88)。我们的结果表明,使用配置学习范式,情境恐惧记忆保持可以在7天内得到证明,为此,我们提供了稳健且可复制的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning & memory
Learning & memory 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The neurobiology of learning and memory is entering a new interdisciplinary era. Advances in neuropsychology have identified regions of brain tissue that are critical for certain types of function. Electrophysiological techniques have revealed behavioral correlates of neuronal activity. Studies of synaptic plasticity suggest that some mechanisms of memory formation may resemble those of neural development. And molecular approaches have identified genes with patterns of expression that influence behavior. It is clear that future progress depends on interdisciplinary investigations. The current literature of learning and memory is large but fragmented. Until now, there has been no single journal devoted to this area of study and no dominant journal that demands attention by serious workers in the area, regardless of specialty. Learning & Memory provides a forum for these investigations in the form of research papers and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信