经皮腰叶内固定治疗病理性骶骨骨折和脊柱骨盆分离:患者系列。

Nikolas Baksh, Caleb Yeung, Max Vaynrub
{"title":"经皮腰叶内固定治疗病理性骶骨骨折和脊柱骨盆分离:患者系列。","authors":"Nikolas Baksh, Caleb Yeung, Max Vaynrub","doi":"10.3171/CASE23205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because patients with advanced cancer live longer, the number of patients with the sequelae of metastatic spine disease has increased. Pathologic instability of the mobile spine has been classified, and minimally invasive surgery has been well described. However, pathologic sacral instability is uncommon and often underdiagnosed. Although most sacral fractures are stable, patients with unstable U- or H-type fractures have spinopelvic dissociation and can experience progressive pain, sacral kyphosis, and neurological injury. Open lumbopelvic fusion carries a high perioperative risk for this patient population, which has often been previously radiated and is medically frail. The authors investigated the utility and safety of percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation, as previously described for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation, in the oncological setting. The authors retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with unstable pathologic sacral fractures who had undergone percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation after conservative management failed.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Patients experienced significant improvement between pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores (9.2 and 1.6, respectively) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grades (median 3 and 1, respectively). All patients were independently ambulatory at the final follow-up. Sagittal alignment remained stable in four patients and worsened in one. There were no major medical or surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation shows promising results for palliation, durability, and safety for pathologic sacropelvic instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/c2/CASE23205.PMC10555589.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation for pathologic sacral fractures and spinopelvic dissociation: patient series.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolas Baksh, Caleb Yeung, Max Vaynrub\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/CASE23205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because patients with advanced cancer live longer, the number of patients with the sequelae of metastatic spine disease has increased. Pathologic instability of the mobile spine has been classified, and minimally invasive surgery has been well described. However, pathologic sacral instability is uncommon and often underdiagnosed. Although most sacral fractures are stable, patients with unstable U- or H-type fractures have spinopelvic dissociation and can experience progressive pain, sacral kyphosis, and neurological injury. Open lumbopelvic fusion carries a high perioperative risk for this patient population, which has often been previously radiated and is medically frail. The authors investigated the utility and safety of percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation, as previously described for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation, in the oncological setting. The authors retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with unstable pathologic sacral fractures who had undergone percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation after conservative management failed.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Patients experienced significant improvement between pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores (9.2 and 1.6, respectively) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grades (median 3 and 1, respectively). All patients were independently ambulatory at the final follow-up. Sagittal alignment remained stable in four patients and worsened in one. There were no major medical or surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Lessons: </strong>Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation shows promising results for palliation, durability, and safety for pathologic sacropelvic instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/c2/CASE23205.PMC10555589.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE23205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE23205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于晚期癌症患者寿命较长,脊柱转移性疾病后遗症患者的数量增加。对可移动脊柱的病理学不稳定性进行了分类,并对微创手术进行了很好的描述。然而,病理性骶骨不稳定并不常见,而且往往诊断不足。尽管大多数骶骨骨折是稳定的,但不稳定的U型或H型骨折患者会出现脊柱骨盆分离,并可能出现进行性疼痛、骶骨后凸和神经损伤。开放性腰叶融合术对这一患者群体来说具有很高的围手术期风险,因为他们以前经常受到辐射,而且身体虚弱。作者研究了经皮腰盆内固定术的实用性和安全性,如前所述,在肿瘤学环境中用于创伤性脊柱骨盆分离。作者回顾性分析了连续5例不稳定病理性骶骨骨折患者,这些患者在保守治疗失败后接受了经皮腰叶内固定术。观察结果:患者在术前和术后视觉模拟量表评分(分别为9.2和1.6)和东方肿瘤协作组评分(中位数分别为3和1)之间有显著改善。所有患者在最后一次随访时均能独立行走。4名患者的矢状线保持稳定,1名患者的情况恶化。没有重大的医疗或手术并发症。经验教训:经皮腰叶内固定术在缓解、耐久性和安全性方面对病理性骶盆腔不稳定表现出良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation for pathologic sacral fractures and spinopelvic dissociation: patient series.

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation for pathologic sacral fractures and spinopelvic dissociation: patient series.

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation for pathologic sacral fractures and spinopelvic dissociation: patient series.

Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation for pathologic sacral fractures and spinopelvic dissociation: patient series.

Background: Because patients with advanced cancer live longer, the number of patients with the sequelae of metastatic spine disease has increased. Pathologic instability of the mobile spine has been classified, and minimally invasive surgery has been well described. However, pathologic sacral instability is uncommon and often underdiagnosed. Although most sacral fractures are stable, patients with unstable U- or H-type fractures have spinopelvic dissociation and can experience progressive pain, sacral kyphosis, and neurological injury. Open lumbopelvic fusion carries a high perioperative risk for this patient population, which has often been previously radiated and is medically frail. The authors investigated the utility and safety of percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation, as previously described for traumatic spinopelvic dissociation, in the oncological setting. The authors retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with unstable pathologic sacral fractures who had undergone percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation after conservative management failed.

Observations: Patients experienced significant improvement between pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores (9.2 and 1.6, respectively) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grades (median 3 and 1, respectively). All patients were independently ambulatory at the final follow-up. Sagittal alignment remained stable in four patients and worsened in one. There were no major medical or surgical complications.

Lessons: Percutaneous lumbopelvic fixation shows promising results for palliation, durability, and safety for pathologic sacropelvic instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信