初级保健中慢性呼吸困难的管理:全科医生、非全科医生专家和联合卫生专业人员怎么看?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anthony Sunjaya, Allison Martin, Clare Arnott, Christine Jenkins
{"title":"初级保健中慢性呼吸困难的管理:全科医生、非全科医生专家和联合卫生专业人员怎么看?","authors":"Anthony Sunjaya,&nbsp;Allison Martin,&nbsp;Clare Arnott,&nbsp;Christine Jenkins","doi":"10.1071/PY22018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the perspectives of GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness, the barriers faced, and the resources needed to optimise care of patients with chronic breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study involving focus group discussions that included 35GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals. Topics explored included: (1) views on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness; (2) barriers to optimal assessment in primary care; and (3) facilitators to further optimise the care of patients with chronic breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants considered that primary care has a central role to play in the assessment and management of chronic breathlessness, but greater access to referral services, suitable funding structures, and upskilling on the use of diagnostic tests such as spirometry and electrocardiography are required for this to be realised. Both GPs and non-GP specialists described great potential for developing better linkages, including new ways of referral and online consultations, greater ease of referral to allied health services, even if conducted virtually, for patients with functional causes of breathlessness. Participants identified a need to develop integrated breathlessness clinics for patients referred by GPs, which would ensure patients receive optimal care in the shortest possible time frame.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs are crucial to achieving optimal care for breathless patients, especially given the multifactorial and multimorbid nature of breathlessness; however, there are significant gaps in services and resources at present that limit their ability to perform this role.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"29 4","pages":"375-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of chronic breathlessness in primary care: what do GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals think?\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Sunjaya,&nbsp;Allison Martin,&nbsp;Clare Arnott,&nbsp;Christine Jenkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY22018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the perspectives of GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness, the barriers faced, and the resources needed to optimise care of patients with chronic breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study involving focus group discussions that included 35GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals. Topics explored included: (1) views on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness; (2) barriers to optimal assessment in primary care; and (3) facilitators to further optimise the care of patients with chronic breathlessness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants considered that primary care has a central role to play in the assessment and management of chronic breathlessness, but greater access to referral services, suitable funding structures, and upskilling on the use of diagnostic tests such as spirometry and electrocardiography are required for this to be realised. Both GPs and non-GP specialists described great potential for developing better linkages, including new ways of referral and online consultations, greater ease of referral to allied health services, even if conducted virtually, for patients with functional causes of breathlessness. Participants identified a need to develop integrated breathlessness clinics for patients referred by GPs, which would ensure patients receive optimal care in the shortest possible time frame.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs are crucial to achieving optimal care for breathless patients, especially given the multifactorial and multimorbid nature of breathlessness; however, there are significant gaps in services and resources at present that limit their ability to perform this role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"375-384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:探讨全科医生、非全科医生专家和联合卫生专业人员对初级保健在诊断和管理慢性呼吸困难中的作用、面临的障碍和优化慢性呼吸困难患者护理所需资源的看法。方法:这是一项定性研究,涉及焦点小组讨论,包括35名全科医生、非全科医生专家和联合卫生专业人员。探讨的主题包括:(1)初级保健在诊断和管理慢性呼吸困难中的作用;(2)初级保健优化评估的障碍;(3)促进进一步优化慢性呼吸困难患者的护理。结果:所有与会者都认为,初级保健在慢性呼吸困难的评估和管理中发挥着核心作用,但要实现这一点,需要更多地获得转诊服务、适当的资金结构和提高使用肺活量测定法和心电图等诊断测试的技能。全科医生和非全科医生专家都描述了发展更好的联系的巨大潜力,包括新的转诊和在线咨询方式,更容易转诊到联合卫生服务,即使是虚拟的,为患有功能性原因的呼吸困难的患者。与会者确定有必要为全科医生转诊的患者开发综合呼吸困难诊所,这将确保患者在尽可能短的时间内获得最佳护理。结论:全科医生对呼吸困难患者的最佳护理至关重要,特别是考虑到呼吸困难的多因素和多发病性质;但是,目前在服务和资源方面存在重大差距,限制了它们发挥这一作用的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of chronic breathlessness in primary care: what do GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals think?

Background: To explore the perspectives of GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness, the barriers faced, and the resources needed to optimise care of patients with chronic breathlessness.

Methods: This was a qualitative study involving focus group discussions that included 35GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals. Topics explored included: (1) views on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness; (2) barriers to optimal assessment in primary care; and (3) facilitators to further optimise the care of patients with chronic breathlessness.

Results: All participants considered that primary care has a central role to play in the assessment and management of chronic breathlessness, but greater access to referral services, suitable funding structures, and upskilling on the use of diagnostic tests such as spirometry and electrocardiography are required for this to be realised. Both GPs and non-GP specialists described great potential for developing better linkages, including new ways of referral and online consultations, greater ease of referral to allied health services, even if conducted virtually, for patients with functional causes of breathlessness. Participants identified a need to develop integrated breathlessness clinics for patients referred by GPs, which would ensure patients receive optimal care in the shortest possible time frame.

Conclusions: GPs are crucial to achieving optimal care for breathless patients, especially given the multifactorial and multimorbid nature of breathlessness; however, there are significant gaps in services and resources at present that limit their ability to perform this role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信