BRAF和EZH1/SOP/ZNF148三基因突变分类器的组合提高了不确定甲状腺结节的良性呼叫率。

IF 11.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Endocrine Pathology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s12022-023-09782-0
Shichen Xu, Gangming Cai, Yun Zhu, Xiaobo Gu, Jing Wu, Xian Cheng, Jiandong Bao, Huixin Yu, Li Zhang
{"title":"BRAF和EZH1/SOP/ZNF148三基因突变分类器的组合提高了不确定甲状腺结节的良性呼叫率。","authors":"Shichen Xu,&nbsp;Gangming Cai,&nbsp;Yun Zhu,&nbsp;Xiaobo Gu,&nbsp;Jing Wu,&nbsp;Xian Cheng,&nbsp;Jiandong Bao,&nbsp;Huixin Yu,&nbsp;Li Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12022-023-09782-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules remained challenging because of the inconclusiveness of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. In the present study, 583 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) thyroid nodule tissues and 161 FNA specimens were enrolled retrospectively. Then BRAF V600E, EZH1 Q571R, SPOP P94R, and ZNF148 mutations among these samples were identified using Sanger sequencing. Based on this four-gene genomic classifier, we proposed a two-step modality to diagnose thyroid nodules to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules. In the FFPE group, thyroid cancers were effectively diagnosed in 37.7% (220/583) of neoplasms by the primary BRAF V600E testing, and 15.7% (57/363) of thyroid nodules could be further determined as benign by subsequent EZH1 Q571R, SPOP P94R, and ZNF148 (we called them \"ESZ\") mutation testing. In the FNA group, 161 BRAF wild-type specimens were classified according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). A total of 7 mutated samples fell within Bethesda categories III-IV, and the mutation rate of \"ESZ\" in Bethesda III-IV categories was 8.4%. The two-step genomic classifier could further improve thyroid nodule diagnosis, which may inform more optimal patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":55167,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"323-332"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Combination of BRAF and EZH1/SPOP/ZNF148 Three-Gene Mutational Classifier Improves Benign Call Rate in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.\",\"authors\":\"Shichen Xu,&nbsp;Gangming Cai,&nbsp;Yun Zhu,&nbsp;Xiaobo Gu,&nbsp;Jing Wu,&nbsp;Xian Cheng,&nbsp;Jiandong Bao,&nbsp;Huixin Yu,&nbsp;Li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12022-023-09782-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reliable preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules remained challenging because of the inconclusiveness of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. In the present study, 583 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) thyroid nodule tissues and 161 FNA specimens were enrolled retrospectively. Then BRAF V600E, EZH1 Q571R, SPOP P94R, and ZNF148 mutations among these samples were identified using Sanger sequencing. Based on this four-gene genomic classifier, we proposed a two-step modality to diagnose thyroid nodules to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules. In the FFPE group, thyroid cancers were effectively diagnosed in 37.7% (220/583) of neoplasms by the primary BRAF V600E testing, and 15.7% (57/363) of thyroid nodules could be further determined as benign by subsequent EZH1 Q571R, SPOP P94R, and ZNF148 (we called them \\\"ESZ\\\") mutation testing. In the FNA group, 161 BRAF wild-type specimens were classified according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). A total of 7 mutated samples fell within Bethesda categories III-IV, and the mutation rate of \\\"ESZ\\\" in Bethesda III-IV categories was 8.4%. The two-step genomic classifier could further improve thyroid nodule diagnosis, which may inform more optimal patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"323-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-023-09782-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-023-09782-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲状腺结节的可靠术前诊断仍然具有挑战性,因为细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学不全面。在本研究中,对583例福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)甲状腺结节组织和161例FNA标本进行了回顾性研究。然后使用Sanger测序鉴定这些样品中的BRAF V600E、EZH1 Q571R、SPOP P94R和ZNF148突变。基于这种四基因基因组分类器,我们提出了一种诊断甲状腺结节的两步模式,以区分甲状腺结节的良恶性。在FFPE组中,通过原发BRAF V600E检测,37.7%(220/583)的肿瘤被有效诊断为甲状腺癌,15.7%(57/363)的甲状腺结节可以通过随后的EZH1 Q571R、SPOP P94R和ZNF148(我们称之为“ESZ”)突变检测进一步确定为良性。在FNA组中,161个BRAF野生型标本根据Bethesda甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统(TBSRTC)进行分类。共有7个突变样本属于Bethesda III-IV类,“ESZ”在Bethesda III-IV类中的突变率为8.4%。两步基因组分类器可以进一步改进甲状腺结节的诊断,这可能为更优化的患者管理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Combination of BRAF and EZH1/SPOP/ZNF148 Three-Gene Mutational Classifier Improves Benign Call Rate in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.

A Combination of BRAF and EZH1/SPOP/ZNF148 Three-Gene Mutational Classifier Improves Benign Call Rate in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.

Reliable preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules remained challenging because of the inconclusiveness of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. In the present study, 583 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) thyroid nodule tissues and 161 FNA specimens were enrolled retrospectively. Then BRAF V600E, EZH1 Q571R, SPOP P94R, and ZNF148 mutations among these samples were identified using Sanger sequencing. Based on this four-gene genomic classifier, we proposed a two-step modality to diagnose thyroid nodules to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules. In the FFPE group, thyroid cancers were effectively diagnosed in 37.7% (220/583) of neoplasms by the primary BRAF V600E testing, and 15.7% (57/363) of thyroid nodules could be further determined as benign by subsequent EZH1 Q571R, SPOP P94R, and ZNF148 (we called them "ESZ") mutation testing. In the FNA group, 161 BRAF wild-type specimens were classified according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). A total of 7 mutated samples fell within Bethesda categories III-IV, and the mutation rate of "ESZ" in Bethesda III-IV categories was 8.4%. The two-step genomic classifier could further improve thyroid nodule diagnosis, which may inform more optimal patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine Pathology
Endocrine Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
20.50%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine Pathology publishes original articles on clinical and basic aspects of endocrine disorders. Work with animals or in vitro techniques is acceptable if it is relevant to human normal or abnormal endocrinology. Manuscripts will be considered for publication in the form of original articles, case reports, clinical case presentations, reviews, and descriptions of techniques. Submission of a paper implies that it reports unpublished work, except in abstract form, and is not being submitted simultaneously to another publication. Accepted manuscripts become the sole property of Endocrine Pathology and may not be published elsewhere without written consent from the publisher. All articles are subject to review by experienced referees. The Editors and Editorial Board judge manuscripts suitable for publication, and decisions by the Editors are final.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信