评价一个发展中国家卫生技术评估报告的质量。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Asma Sabermahani, Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi, Salman Bashzar
{"title":"评价一个发展中国家卫生技术评估报告的质量。","authors":"Asma Sabermahani,&nbsp;Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi,&nbsp;Salman Bashzar","doi":"10.26719/emhj.22.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No single method of health technology assessment (HTA) can meet all the policy- and decision-making needs in a country. However, there should be minimum criteria for performing HTA worldwide, and many HTA agencies have reached a consensus on this.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the quality of HTA reports in the Islamic Republic of Iran.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined all the HTA research reports published by the Iranian HTA office up to 2020, using the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment checklist for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 reports were examined, of which only 10.0% provided complete and appropriate contact details for further information and 5.6% clearly stated a conflict of interest. In 87.78% of the reports, the scope of assessment was clearly determined. The quality of the reports was relatively appropriate as well as details of the sources of information and text search strategies. Some 7.8%, 74.4%, 11.1%, 8.9%, and 4.4%, respectively, of the reports considered legal aspects, economic analysis, ethical implications, social implications, and other stakeholder perspectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend that minimum standards be established for the HTA process so that healthcare policy- and decision-makers can make reliable decisions on the basis of the HTA reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":11411,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal","volume":"29 7","pages":"554-561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the quality of health technology assessment reports in a developing country.\",\"authors\":\"Asma Sabermahani,&nbsp;Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi,&nbsp;Salman Bashzar\",\"doi\":\"10.26719/emhj.22.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No single method of health technology assessment (HTA) can meet all the policy- and decision-making needs in a country. However, there should be minimum criteria for performing HTA worldwide, and many HTA agencies have reached a consensus on this.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the quality of HTA reports in the Islamic Republic of Iran.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined all the HTA research reports published by the Iranian HTA office up to 2020, using the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment checklist for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 reports were examined, of which only 10.0% provided complete and appropriate contact details for further information and 5.6% clearly stated a conflict of interest. In 87.78% of the reports, the scope of assessment was clearly determined. The quality of the reports was relatively appropriate as well as details of the sources of information and text search strategies. Some 7.8%, 74.4%, 11.1%, 8.9%, and 4.4%, respectively, of the reports considered legal aspects, economic analysis, ethical implications, social implications, and other stakeholder perspectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend that minimum standards be established for the HTA process so that healthcare policy- and decision-makers can make reliable decisions on the basis of the HTA reports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 7\",\"pages\":\"554-561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.22.017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.22.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:没有一种卫生技术评估方法能够满足一个国家的所有政策和决策需求。然而,在世界范围内执行HTA应该有一个最低标准,许多HTA机构已经就此达成了共识。目的:本研究旨在评估伊朗伊斯兰共和国HTA报告的质量。方法:我们使用国际卫生技术评估机构网络检查表进行质量评估,检查伊朗HTA办公室截至2020年发表的所有HTA研究报告。结果:共审查了97份报告,其中只有10.0%提供了完整和适当的联系方式以获取进一步信息,5.6%明确指出了利益冲突。87.78%的报告明确了评价范围。报告的质量相对适当,信息来源和文本搜索策略的细节也比较详细。分别有7.8%、74.4%、11.1%、8.9%和4.4%的报告考虑了法律方面、经济分析、伦理影响、社会影响和其他利益相关者的观点。结论:我们建议为HTA流程建立最低标准,以便医疗政策和决策者能够根据HTA报告做出可靠的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the quality of health technology assessment reports in a developing country.

Background: No single method of health technology assessment (HTA) can meet all the policy- and decision-making needs in a country. However, there should be minimum criteria for performing HTA worldwide, and many HTA agencies have reached a consensus on this.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the quality of HTA reports in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Method: We examined all the HTA research reports published by the Iranian HTA office up to 2020, using the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment checklist for quality assessment.

Results: A total of 97 reports were examined, of which only 10.0% provided complete and appropriate contact details for further information and 5.6% clearly stated a conflict of interest. In 87.78% of the reports, the scope of assessment was clearly determined. The quality of the reports was relatively appropriate as well as details of the sources of information and text search strategies. Some 7.8%, 74.4%, 11.1%, 8.9%, and 4.4%, respectively, of the reports considered legal aspects, economic analysis, ethical implications, social implications, and other stakeholder perspectives.

Conclusion: We recommend that minimum standards be established for the HTA process so that healthcare policy- and decision-makers can make reliable decisions on the basis of the HTA reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal
Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICESPUBLIC, ENV-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, established in 1995, is the flagship health periodical of the World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. The mission of the Journal is to contribute to improving health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region by publishing and publicising quality health research and information with emphasis on public health and the strategic health priorities of the Region. It aims to: further public health knowledge, policy, practice and education; support health policy-makers, researchers and practitioners; and enable health professionals to remain informed of developments in public health. The EMHJ: -publishes original peer-reviewed research and reviews in all areas of public health of relevance to the Eastern Mediterranean Region -encourages, in particular, research related to the regional health priorities, namely: health systems strengthening; emergency preparedness and response; communicable diseases; noncommunicable diseases and mental health; reproductive, maternal, child health and nutrition -provides up-to-date information on public health developments with special reference to the Region. The Journal addresses all members of the health profession, health educational institutes, as well as governmental and nongovernmental organizations in the area of public health within and outside the Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信