Shelby DeWaard , Zachary Dewyer , Talal Al Assil , Rachael Gallap , Lauren Patrick , Noelle Fukuda , Maureen Ford
{"title":"急诊科的一项教育干预措施，旨在提高20-64岁未接种疫苗患者的新冠肺炎疫苗接种率。","authors":"Shelby DeWaard , Zachary Dewyer , Talal Al Assil , Rachael Gallap , Lauren Patrick , Noelle Fukuda , Maureen Ford","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 vaccination<span> rate in the US has plateaued, especially among minorities and young populations. Previous efforts within the Emergency Department<span> (ED) setting to address this disparity<span> have shown positive results. The ED can play a crucial role in engaging vaccine-hesitant individuals, particularly those with limited access to healthcare. By providing education, addressing concerns, and using positive framing, vaccination rates can be improved in the ED. This quality improvement project aimed to increase vaccination rates through one-on-one educational interventions and open discussions with patients.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between November 2021 and June 2022, unvaccinated adult patients aged 20 to 64 visiting a local ED in Kalamazoo, MI were approached for a discussion on COVID vaccines. A research team, trained in motivational interviewing techniques, provided an educational intervention, offering evidence-based information and resources to unvaccinated participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 37 participants were enrolled, and their demographics were recorded. The participants expressed various concerns about the vaccine, including potential side effects, speed of testing and production, perceived ineffectiveness, mistrust, and low personal risk. At the four-week follow-up, three participants (8%) had received their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study fell short of its desired sample size and the intervention failed to raise vaccination rates among ED patients. Factors like low perceived risk, vaccine hesitancy, and limited resources may have influenced these outcomes. Future research should focus on staffing, operational hours, repeated educational interventions, and targeted approaches for different populations. Improving participant recruitment through institutional engagement and involvement of multiple EDs should be explored. Addressing these factors can help inform effective interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates in the ED.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An educational intervention in the emergency department seeking to improve COVID-19 vaccination rates among unvaccinated patients aged 20-64\",\"authors\":\"Shelby DeWaard , Zachary Dewyer , Talal Al Assil , Rachael Gallap , Lauren Patrick , Noelle Fukuda , Maureen Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idh.2023.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 vaccination<span> rate in the US has plateaued, especially among minorities and young populations. Previous efforts within the Emergency Department<span> (ED) setting to address this disparity<span> have shown positive results. The ED can play a crucial role in engaging vaccine-hesitant individuals, particularly those with limited access to healthcare. By providing education, addressing concerns, and using positive framing, vaccination rates can be improved in the ED. This quality improvement project aimed to increase vaccination rates through one-on-one educational interventions and open discussions with patients.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between November 2021 and June 2022, unvaccinated adult patients aged 20 to 64 visiting a local ED in Kalamazoo, MI were approached for a discussion on COVID vaccines. A research team, trained in motivational interviewing techniques, provided an educational intervention, offering evidence-based information and resources to unvaccinated participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 37 participants were enrolled, and their demographics were recorded. The participants expressed various concerns about the vaccine, including potential side effects, speed of testing and production, perceived ineffectiveness, mistrust, and low personal risk. At the four-week follow-up, three participants (8%) had received their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study fell short of its desired sample size and the intervention failed to raise vaccination rates among ED patients. Factors like low perceived risk, vaccine hesitancy, and limited resources may have influenced these outcomes. Future research should focus on staffing, operational hours, repeated educational interventions, and targeted approaches for different populations. Improving participant recruitment through institutional engagement and involvement of multiple EDs should be explored. Addressing these factors can help inform effective interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates in the ED.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Disease & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Disease & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045123000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045123000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
An educational intervention in the emergency department seeking to improve COVID-19 vaccination rates among unvaccinated patients aged 20-64
Background
The COVID-19 vaccination rate in the US has plateaued, especially among minorities and young populations. Previous efforts within the Emergency Department (ED) setting to address this disparity have shown positive results. The ED can play a crucial role in engaging vaccine-hesitant individuals, particularly those with limited access to healthcare. By providing education, addressing concerns, and using positive framing, vaccination rates can be improved in the ED. This quality improvement project aimed to increase vaccination rates through one-on-one educational interventions and open discussions with patients.
Methods
Between November 2021 and June 2022, unvaccinated adult patients aged 20 to 64 visiting a local ED in Kalamazoo, MI were approached for a discussion on COVID vaccines. A research team, trained in motivational interviewing techniques, provided an educational intervention, offering evidence-based information and resources to unvaccinated participants.
Results
A total of 37 participants were enrolled, and their demographics were recorded. The participants expressed various concerns about the vaccine, including potential side effects, speed of testing and production, perceived ineffectiveness, mistrust, and low personal risk. At the four-week follow-up, three participants (8%) had received their first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Conclusion
The study fell short of its desired sample size and the intervention failed to raise vaccination rates among ED patients. Factors like low perceived risk, vaccine hesitancy, and limited resources may have influenced these outcomes. Future research should focus on staffing, operational hours, repeated educational interventions, and targeted approaches for different populations. Improving participant recruitment through institutional engagement and involvement of multiple EDs should be explored. Addressing these factors can help inform effective interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates in the ED.
期刊介绍：
The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
