喉咽反流病诊断量表的应用进展

Q4 Medicine
Yue Han, Sen Zhang, Hui Huangfu, Chenyang Liu, Chenxu Yan
{"title":"喉咽反流病诊断量表的应用进展","authors":"Yue Han,&nbsp;Sen Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Huangfu,&nbsp;Chenyang Liu,&nbsp;Chenxu Yan","doi":"10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":18104,"journal":{"name":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery","volume":"37 4","pages":"313-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406593/pdf/lcebyhtjwkzz-37-4-313.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].\",\"authors\":\"Yue Han,&nbsp;Sen Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Huangfu,&nbsp;Chenyang Liu,&nbsp;Chenxu Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"313-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406593/pdf/lcebyhtjwkzz-37-4-313.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,诊断咽喉反流病(LPRD)的客观方法不是微创、有效和经济的。诊断量表因其价格低廉、无需侵入性强且易于操作。反流症状指数(RSI)和反流发现评分(RFS)是临床诊断中首选的指标。然而,近年来在RSI和RFS的应用中出现了许多争议,给临床诊断带来了许多麻烦。因此,本文对RSI和RFS在临床应用中的问题进行了简要讨论,为准确诊断LPRD提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信