Olga Coelho, Rute Pires, Ana Sousa Ferreira, Bruno Gonçalves, Samia A Alkhoori, Mohamed Sayed, Amany ElRasheed, Maryam AlJassmi, Joana Henriques-Calado, Joana Stocker
{"title":"DSM-5 (PID-5)人格量表在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)社区和临床人群中的跨文化研究。","authors":"Olga Coelho, Rute Pires, Ana Sousa Ferreira, Bruno Gonçalves, Samia A Alkhoori, Mohamed Sayed, Amany ElRasheed, Maryam AlJassmi, Joana Henriques-Calado, Joana Stocker","doi":"10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants (<i>N</i> = 300, 80% women and 20% men, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants (<i>N</i> = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE (<i>N</i> = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 31.29) and Portugal (<i>N</i> = 150, 52% men and 48% women, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156022/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Coelho, Rute Pires, Ana Sousa Ferreira, Bruno Gonçalves, Samia A Alkhoori, Mohamed Sayed, Amany ElRasheed, Maryam AlJassmi, Joana Henriques-Calado, Joana Stocker\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants (<i>N</i> = 300, 80% women and 20% men, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants (<i>N</i> = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE (<i>N</i> = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 31.29) and Portugal (<i>N</i> = 150, 52% men and 48% women, <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156022/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.
Aims: The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.
Background: The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.
Objectives: We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.
Methods: The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants (N = 300, 80% women and 20% men, Mage = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants (N = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, Mage = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE (N = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, Mage = 31.29) and Portugal (N = 150, 52% men and 48% women, Mage = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.
Results: Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.
Conclusion: Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
