成年机械性腰痛患者捏脊治疗的最佳实践:美国捏脊医生临床实践指南

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wayne M. Whalen DC , Cheryl Hawk DC, PhD , Ronald J. Farabaugh DC , Clinton J. Daniels DC, MS , David N. Taylor DC , Kristian R. Anderson DC, MS , Louis S. Crivelli DC, MS , Derek R. Anderson PhD , Lisa M. Thomson DC , Richard L. Sarnat MD
{"title":"成年机械性腰痛患者捏脊治疗的最佳实践:美国捏脊医生临床实践指南","authors":"Wayne M. Whalen DC ,&nbsp;Cheryl Hawk DC, PhD ,&nbsp;Ronald J. Farabaugh DC ,&nbsp;Clinton J. Daniels DC, MS ,&nbsp;David N. Taylor DC ,&nbsp;Kristian R. Anderson DC, MS ,&nbsp;Louis S. Crivelli DC, MS ,&nbsp;Derek R. Anderson PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Thomson DC ,&nbsp;Richard L. Sarnat MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this paper was to update the previously published 2016 best-practice recommendations for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical low back pain (LBP) in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two experienced health librarians conducted the literature searches for clinical practice guidelines and other relevant literature, and the investigators performed quality assessment of included studies. PubMed was searched from March 2015 to September 2021. A steering committee of 10 experts in chiropractic research, education, and practice used the most current relevant guidelines and publications to update care recommendations. A panel of 69 experts used a modified Delphi process to rate the recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The literature search yielded 14 clinical practice guidelines, 10 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (all high quality). Sixty-nine members of the panel rated 38 recommendations. All but 1 statement achieved consensus in the first round, and the final statement reached consensus in the second round. Recommendations covered the clinical encounter from history, physical examination, and diagnostic considerations through informed consent, co-management, and treatment considerations for patients with mechanical LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This paper updates a previously published best-practice document for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical LBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000167/pdfft?md5=84637cc8a238989fd64cb0d5d7ea28c1&pid=1-s2.0-S0161475423000167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practices for Chiropractic Management of Adult Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Chiropractors in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Wayne M. Whalen DC ,&nbsp;Cheryl Hawk DC, PhD ,&nbsp;Ronald J. Farabaugh DC ,&nbsp;Clinton J. Daniels DC, MS ,&nbsp;David N. Taylor DC ,&nbsp;Kristian R. Anderson DC, MS ,&nbsp;Louis S. Crivelli DC, MS ,&nbsp;Derek R. Anderson PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Thomson DC ,&nbsp;Richard L. Sarnat MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.04.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this paper was to update the previously published 2016 best-practice recommendations for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical low back pain (LBP) in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two experienced health librarians conducted the literature searches for clinical practice guidelines and other relevant literature, and the investigators performed quality assessment of included studies. PubMed was searched from March 2015 to September 2021. A steering committee of 10 experts in chiropractic research, education, and practice used the most current relevant guidelines and publications to update care recommendations. A panel of 69 experts used a modified Delphi process to rate the recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The literature search yielded 14 clinical practice guidelines, 10 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (all high quality). Sixty-nine members of the panel rated 38 recommendations. All but 1 statement achieved consensus in the first round, and the final statement reached consensus in the second round. Recommendations covered the clinical encounter from history, physical examination, and diagnostic considerations through informed consent, co-management, and treatment considerations for patients with mechanical LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This paper updates a previously published best-practice document for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical LBP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000167/pdfft?md5=84637cc8a238989fd64cb0d5d7ea28c1&pid=1-s2.0-S0161475423000167-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475423000167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是更新先前发布的2016年美国成人机械性腰痛(LBP)捏脊治疗最佳实践建议。方法由两名经验丰富的卫生图书馆员对临床实践指南及相关文献进行文献检索,研究者对纳入的研究进行质量评价。PubMed检索时间为2015年3月至2021年9月。一个由脊椎指压研究、教育和实践方面的10名专家组成的指导委员会使用最新的相关指南和出版物来更新护理建议。一个由69名专家组成的小组使用一种改进的德尔菲程序对这些建议进行评级。结果检索到14份临床实践指南,10篇系统评价,5篇随机对照试验(均为高质量)。该小组的69名成员对38项建议进行了评估。除1项声明外,其余声明均在第一轮达成共识,最后一项声明在第二轮达成共识。建议涵盖了从病史、体格检查、通过知情同意的诊断考虑、共同管理和对机械性腰痛患者的治疗考虑的临床遭遇。结论:本文更新了先前发表的关于成人机械腰痛捏脊治疗的最佳实践文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best Practices for Chiropractic Management of Adult Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Chiropractors in the United States

Objective

The purpose of this paper was to update the previously published 2016 best-practice recommendations for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical low back pain (LBP) in the United States.

Methods

Two experienced health librarians conducted the literature searches for clinical practice guidelines and other relevant literature, and the investigators performed quality assessment of included studies. PubMed was searched from March 2015 to September 2021. A steering committee of 10 experts in chiropractic research, education, and practice used the most current relevant guidelines and publications to update care recommendations. A panel of 69 experts used a modified Delphi process to rate the recommendations.

Results

The literature search yielded 14 clinical practice guidelines, 10 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (all high quality). Sixty-nine members of the panel rated 38 recommendations. All but 1 statement achieved consensus in the first round, and the final statement reached consensus in the second round. Recommendations covered the clinical encounter from history, physical examination, and diagnostic considerations through informed consent, co-management, and treatment considerations for patients with mechanical LBP.

Conclusion

This paper updates a previously published best-practice document for chiropractic management of adults with mechanical LBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信