灾害和突发公共卫生事件卫生数据收集和管理:范围审查。

Q3 Medicine
Alissa J Mitchell, Tatsuhiko Kubo, Alexander H Chang, Odgerel Chimed Ochir, Anthony Salerno, Yui Yumiya, Daniel J Barnett, Katsumi Nakase, Edbert B Hsu
{"title":"灾害和突发公共卫生事件卫生数据收集和管理:范围审查。","authors":"Alissa J Mitchell,&nbsp;Tatsuhiko Kubo,&nbsp;Alexander H Chang,&nbsp;Odgerel Chimed Ochir,&nbsp;Anthony Salerno,&nbsp;Yui Yumiya,&nbsp;Daniel J Barnett,&nbsp;Katsumi Nakase,&nbsp;Edbert B Hsu","doi":"10.5055/ajdm.2022.0443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Minimum Data Set (MDS) to provide a structured, data-based approach to health data collection and management during disasters and public health emergencies. Given recent creation of the EMT MDS, we conducted a scoping review to gauge current practices surrounding health data collection and sharing in emergent settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An English-based scoping review of PubMed and Embase databases of publications before June 28, 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The review aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the WHO-standardized health data collection systems in the context of disasters and public health emergencies; characterize best practices regarding implementation of an MDS to improve health data collection capacity in differing settings; and highlight internationally accepted, standardized tools or methods for setting up essential public health data for disaster response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,038 citations from PubMed and Embase were imported into Covidence with 46 duplicates removed. Among these, 7,992 citations underwent title screening and abstract review, with 161 articles proceeding to full-text article review where an additional 109 articles were excluded. Fifty-two citations were included in final data abstraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings revealed a range of critical operational, structural, and functional insights of relevance to implementation of the EMT MDS. The literature identified facilitators and barriers to collecting and storing disaster-based datasets, gaps in standardization of data collection resulting in poor data quality during the transition from the acute to post-acute phase, and best practices in the collection of EMT MDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":40040,"journal":{"name":"American journal of disaster medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disaster and public health emergency health data collection and management: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Alissa J Mitchell,&nbsp;Tatsuhiko Kubo,&nbsp;Alexander H Chang,&nbsp;Odgerel Chimed Ochir,&nbsp;Anthony Salerno,&nbsp;Yui Yumiya,&nbsp;Daniel J Barnett,&nbsp;Katsumi Nakase,&nbsp;Edbert B Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/ajdm.2022.0443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Minimum Data Set (MDS) to provide a structured, data-based approach to health data collection and management during disasters and public health emergencies. Given recent creation of the EMT MDS, we conducted a scoping review to gauge current practices surrounding health data collection and sharing in emergent settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An English-based scoping review of PubMed and Embase databases of publications before June 28, 2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The review aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the WHO-standardized health data collection systems in the context of disasters and public health emergencies; characterize best practices regarding implementation of an MDS to improve health data collection capacity in differing settings; and highlight internationally accepted, standardized tools or methods for setting up essential public health data for disaster response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,038 citations from PubMed and Embase were imported into Covidence with 46 duplicates removed. Among these, 7,992 citations underwent title screening and abstract review, with 161 articles proceeding to full-text article review where an additional 109 articles were excluded. Fifty-two citations were included in final data abstraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings revealed a range of critical operational, structural, and functional insights of relevance to implementation of the EMT MDS. The literature identified facilitators and barriers to collecting and storing disaster-based datasets, gaps in standardization of data collection resulting in poor data quality during the transition from the acute to post-acute phase, and best practices in the collection of EMT MDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of disaster medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of disaster medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2022.0443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of disaster medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2022.0443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)开发了紧急医疗队(EMT)最低数据集(MDS),以便为灾害和突发公共卫生事件期间的卫生数据收集和管理提供一种结构化的、基于数据的方法。鉴于最近创建了EMT MDS,我们进行了范围审查,以评估紧急情况下有关卫生数据收集和共享的当前做法。设计:在2021年6月28日之前对PubMed和Embase数据库的出版物进行基于英文的范围审查。主要成果措施:审查旨在确定在灾害和突发公共卫生事件背景下实施世卫组织标准化卫生数据收集系统的促进因素和障碍;描述关于实施MDS以提高不同环境下卫生数据收集能力的最佳做法;并强调为灾害应对建立基本公共卫生数据的国际公认的标准化工具或方法。结果:PubMed和Embase共导入了8038条引文,删除了46条重复引文。其中,7992篇引文进行了标题筛选和摘要审查,其中161篇进入全文审查,另有109篇被排除。在最终的数据摘要中包含了52条引文。结论:研究结果揭示了一系列与EMT MDS实施相关的关键操作、结构和功能见解。这些文献确定了收集和存储基于灾害的数据集的促进因素和障碍,数据收集标准化方面的差距导致从急性期到急性期后过渡期间的数据质量差,以及EMT MDS收集的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disaster and public health emergency health data collection and management: A scoping review.

Objective: The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Minimum Data Set (MDS) to provide a structured, data-based approach to health data collection and management during disasters and public health emergencies. Given recent creation of the EMT MDS, we conducted a scoping review to gauge current practices surrounding health data collection and sharing in emergent settings.

Design: An English-based scoping review of PubMed and Embase databases of publications before June 28, 2021.

Main outcome measures: The review aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the WHO-standardized health data collection systems in the context of disasters and public health emergencies; characterize best practices regarding implementation of an MDS to improve health data collection capacity in differing settings; and highlight internationally accepted, standardized tools or methods for setting up essential public health data for disaster response.

Results: A total of 8,038 citations from PubMed and Embase were imported into Covidence with 46 duplicates removed. Among these, 7,992 citations underwent title screening and abstract review, with 161 articles proceeding to full-text article review where an additional 109 articles were excluded. Fifty-two citations were included in final data abstraction.

Conclusions: Findings revealed a range of critical operational, structural, and functional insights of relevance to implementation of the EMT MDS. The literature identified facilitators and barriers to collecting and storing disaster-based datasets, gaps in standardization of data collection resulting in poor data quality during the transition from the acute to post-acute phase, and best practices in the collection of EMT MDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of disaster medicine
American journal of disaster medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: With the publication of the American Journal of Disaster Medicine, for the first time, comes real guidance in this new medical specialty from the country"s foremost experts in areas most physicians and medical professionals have never seen…a deadly cocktail of catastrophic events like blast wounds and post explosion injuries, biological weapons contamination and mass physical and psychological trauma that comes in the wake of natural disasters and disease outbreak. The journal has one goal: to provide physicians and medical professionals the essential informational tools they need as they seek to combine emergency medical and trauma skills with crisis management and new forms of triage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信