多模粘合剂、两步自蚀刻粘合剂和全蚀刻系统对牙髓基牙本质结合效果的比较评估——体外研究。

Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-07 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21
Dhanya Valsan, Sajeev Bhaskaran, Joy Mathew, Krishnan Hari, Joseph Joy
{"title":"多模粘合剂、两步自蚀刻粘合剂和全蚀刻系统对牙髓基牙本质结合效果的比较评估——体外研究。","authors":"Dhanya Valsan,&nbsp;Sajeev Bhaskaran,&nbsp;Joy Mathew,&nbsp;Krishnan Hari,&nbsp;Joseph Joy","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postendodontic restoration with composite resins has gained popularity due to the development of more reliable adhesives with simplified bonding procedures and less technique sensitivity. Pulpal floor dentin is a complex biological structure and a more challenging bonding substrate. Hence, appropriate selection of the bonding agent for these regions of the tooth is important.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the shear bond strength of a new generation of dental adhesives referred to as multimode adhesives, two-step self-etch adhesive, and a total-etch system to pulpal floor dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty human mandibular molars were sectioned with a slow speed diamond disc to expose the pulp chamber and divided into four groups of 15 teeth each, based on the bonding agent used. Group A: Single bond universal (self-etch); Group B: Single Bond Universal (etch-and-rinse), Group C: Clearfil SE Bond, Group D: Adper Single Bond 2. Using a split Teflon mold, composite cylinders were built on the prepared dentinal surfaces. The shear bond strength was then evaluated with the universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two step self-etch adhesives recorded higher shear bond strength than total-etch and multimode/universal adhesives applied in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-etching/priming system bonded more strongly to the pulpal floor dentin than multimode adhesive and total-etch system.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/e9/CCD-14-104.PMC10399809.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An <i>In vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dhanya Valsan,&nbsp;Sajeev Bhaskaran,&nbsp;Joy Mathew,&nbsp;Krishnan Hari,&nbsp;Joseph Joy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postendodontic restoration with composite resins has gained popularity due to the development of more reliable adhesives with simplified bonding procedures and less technique sensitivity. Pulpal floor dentin is a complex biological structure and a more challenging bonding substrate. Hence, appropriate selection of the bonding agent for these regions of the tooth is important.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the shear bond strength of a new generation of dental adhesives referred to as multimode adhesives, two-step self-etch adhesive, and a total-etch system to pulpal floor dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty human mandibular molars were sectioned with a slow speed diamond disc to expose the pulp chamber and divided into four groups of 15 teeth each, based on the bonding agent used. Group A: Single bond universal (self-etch); Group B: Single Bond Universal (etch-and-rinse), Group C: Clearfil SE Bond, Group D: Adper Single Bond 2. Using a split Teflon mold, composite cylinders were built on the prepared dentinal surfaces. The shear bond strength was then evaluated with the universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two step self-etch adhesives recorded higher shear bond strength than total-etch and multimode/universal adhesives applied in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The self-etching/priming system bonded more strongly to the pulpal floor dentin than multimode adhesive and total-etch system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/e9/CCD-14-104.PMC10399809.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:由于开发出了更可靠的粘合剂,简化了粘合程序,降低了技术敏感性,用复合树脂进行根管后修复越来越受欢迎。牙髓基底牙本质是一种复杂的生物结构,也是一种更具挑战性的粘结基质。因此,为牙齿的这些区域适当选择粘合剂是重要的。目的:比较新一代牙科粘合剂(称为多模粘合剂、两步自蚀刻粘合剂和全蚀刻系统)与牙髓基底牙本质的剪切结合强度。材料和方法:用慢速金刚石盘将60颗人类下颌磨牙切开,露出髓室,并根据所用粘合剂分为四组,每组15颗牙齿。A组:单键通用(自蚀刻);B组:Single Bond Universal(蚀刻和冲洗),C组:Clearfil SE Bond,D组:Adper Single Bond 2。使用聚四氟乙烯分体模具,在制备的牙本质表面上构建复合圆柱体。然后用万能试验机评估剪切结合强度。结果:两步自蚀刻粘合剂的剪切结合强度高于自蚀刻和蚀刻冲洗技术中使用的全蚀刻和多模/通用粘合剂。结论:与多模粘合剂和全蚀刻系统相比,自蚀刻/引发系统与牙髓基底牙本质的结合更牢固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An <i>In vitro</i> Study.

Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An <i>In vitro</i> Study.

Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An <i>In vitro</i> Study.

分享
查看原文
Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An In vitro Study.

Background: Postendodontic restoration with composite resins has gained popularity due to the development of more reliable adhesives with simplified bonding procedures and less technique sensitivity. Pulpal floor dentin is a complex biological structure and a more challenging bonding substrate. Hence, appropriate selection of the bonding agent for these regions of the tooth is important.

Aims: To compare the shear bond strength of a new generation of dental adhesives referred to as multimode adhesives, two-step self-etch adhesive, and a total-etch system to pulpal floor dentin.

Materials and methods: Sixty human mandibular molars were sectioned with a slow speed diamond disc to expose the pulp chamber and divided into four groups of 15 teeth each, based on the bonding agent used. Group A: Single bond universal (self-etch); Group B: Single Bond Universal (etch-and-rinse), Group C: Clearfil SE Bond, Group D: Adper Single Bond 2. Using a split Teflon mold, composite cylinders were built on the prepared dentinal surfaces. The shear bond strength was then evaluated with the universal testing machine.

Results: Two step self-etch adhesives recorded higher shear bond strength than total-etch and multimode/universal adhesives applied in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques.

Conclusion: The self-etching/priming system bonded more strongly to the pulpal floor dentin than multimode adhesive and total-etch system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信