监测治疗、风险和副作用。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Contributions to nephrology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000527344
Zsolt Molnár, Jakub Szrama, Katarzyna Sierakowska
{"title":"监测治疗、风险和副作用。","authors":"Zsolt Molnár,&nbsp;Jakub Szrama,&nbsp;Katarzyna Sierakowska","doi":"10.1159/000527344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of organ dysfunction in the critically ill patients and is triggered by an overwhelming host response resulting in the overproduction of various cytokines. Regaining immune homeostasis over the dysregulated immune response through broad removal of cytokines using extracorporeal blood purification therapies has recently gained increasing attention. Nonetheless, many questions remain regarding the appropriate monitoring treatment, its potential risks, and side effects. The CytoSorb blood purification, the most extensively investigated device, has been shown to effectively remove an array of cytokines that may lead to rapid hemodynamic stabilization as indicated by reduced vasopressor need during the treatment, as well as an improvement in vital organ function. However, reported survival benefits have been fairly inconsistent. The therapy has also been confirmed as being safe and well tolerated. Despite several questions remaining such as the right timing, duration, frequency, concomitant antibiotic use, and most appropriate patient group with the highest change of benefit, the additional use as adjuvant therapy in hyperinflammatory states and/or in patients refractory to best standard care seems reasonable. Of note, there are several randomized controlled trials currently registered and ongoing that hopefully will provide answers to some of the above questions in the not-too-distant future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10725,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Treatment, Risks and Side Effects.\",\"authors\":\"Zsolt Molnár,&nbsp;Jakub Szrama,&nbsp;Katarzyna Sierakowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000527344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inflammation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of organ dysfunction in the critically ill patients and is triggered by an overwhelming host response resulting in the overproduction of various cytokines. Regaining immune homeostasis over the dysregulated immune response through broad removal of cytokines using extracorporeal blood purification therapies has recently gained increasing attention. Nonetheless, many questions remain regarding the appropriate monitoring treatment, its potential risks, and side effects. The CytoSorb blood purification, the most extensively investigated device, has been shown to effectively remove an array of cytokines that may lead to rapid hemodynamic stabilization as indicated by reduced vasopressor need during the treatment, as well as an improvement in vital organ function. However, reported survival benefits have been fairly inconsistent. The therapy has also been confirmed as being safe and well tolerated. Despite several questions remaining such as the right timing, duration, frequency, concomitant antibiotic use, and most appropriate patient group with the highest change of benefit, the additional use as adjuvant therapy in hyperinflammatory states and/or in patients refractory to best standard care seems reasonable. Of note, there are several randomized controlled trials currently registered and ongoing that hopefully will provide answers to some of the above questions in the not-too-distant future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

炎症在危重患者器官功能障碍的病理生理学中起着关键作用,是由导致各种细胞因子过度产生的压倒性宿主反应引发的。通过使用体外血液净化疗法广泛去除细胞因子,在失调的免疫反应中恢复免疫稳态最近越来越受到关注。尽管如此,关于适当的监测治疗、其潜在风险和副作用,仍然存在许多问题。CytoSorb血液净化是研究最广泛的设备,已被证明可以有效去除一系列细胞因子,这些细胞因子可能会导致快速的血液动力学稳定,如治疗过程中对血管升压药的需求减少所示,并改善重要器官功能。然而,报告的生存效益却相当不一致。该疗法也被证实是安全和耐受性良好的。尽管仍存在一些问题,如正确的时间、持续时间、频率、伴随抗生素的使用以及获益变化最大的最合适的患者组,但在高炎症状态和/或对最佳标准护理难以接受的患者中,作为辅助治疗的额外使用似乎是合理的。值得注意的是,目前正在注册和进行的几项随机对照试验有望在不久的将来为上述一些问题提供答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring Treatment, Risks and Side Effects.

Inflammation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of organ dysfunction in the critically ill patients and is triggered by an overwhelming host response resulting in the overproduction of various cytokines. Regaining immune homeostasis over the dysregulated immune response through broad removal of cytokines using extracorporeal blood purification therapies has recently gained increasing attention. Nonetheless, many questions remain regarding the appropriate monitoring treatment, its potential risks, and side effects. The CytoSorb blood purification, the most extensively investigated device, has been shown to effectively remove an array of cytokines that may lead to rapid hemodynamic stabilization as indicated by reduced vasopressor need during the treatment, as well as an improvement in vital organ function. However, reported survival benefits have been fairly inconsistent. The therapy has also been confirmed as being safe and well tolerated. Despite several questions remaining such as the right timing, duration, frequency, concomitant antibiotic use, and most appropriate patient group with the highest change of benefit, the additional use as adjuvant therapy in hyperinflammatory states and/or in patients refractory to best standard care seems reasonable. Of note, there are several randomized controlled trials currently registered and ongoing that hopefully will provide answers to some of the above questions in the not-too-distant future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contributions to nephrology
Contributions to nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The speed of developments in nephrology has been fueled by the promise that new findings may improve the care of patients suffering from renal disease. Participating in these rapid advances, this series has released an exceptional number of volumes that explore problems of immediate importance for clinical nephrology. Focus ranges from discussion of innovative treatment strategies to critical evaluations of investigative methodology. The value of regularly consolidating the newest findings and theories is enhanced through the inclusion of extensive bibliographies which make each volume a reference work deserving careful study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信