无袖带中心静脉导管用于慢性肾病患者计划外和紧急开始的血液透析:来自印度的多中心经验。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1177/11297298231191369
Subrahmanian Sathiavageesan, Balamurugan Swaminathan, Murugan Myvizhiselvi, Gopalakrishnan Ramakrishnan, Ramprasad Elumalai
{"title":"无袖带中心静脉导管用于慢性肾病患者计划外和紧急开始的血液透析:来自印度的多中心经验。","authors":"Subrahmanian Sathiavageesan, Balamurugan Swaminathan, Murugan Myvizhiselvi, Gopalakrishnan Ramakrishnan, Ramprasad Elumalai","doi":"10.1177/11297298231191369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is indispensable to unplanned and urgent start haemodialysis in chronic kidney disease (CKD). While cuffed CVC is preferred to non-cuffed CVC for urgent start haemodialysis, patient's clinical condition might warrant immediate insertion of non-cuffed CVC. In the resource poor setting, non-cuffed CVCs might have to be retained longer than guideline recommended limit of 2 weeks. In this multi-centre retrospective observational study, the real-world survival of non-cuffed CVC was assessed among CKD patients who initiated dialysis urgently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CVC survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. Predictors of premature CVC loss were assessed using multi-level multi-variate Cox frailty model wherein, each centre was provided with a random intercept to account for within-centre correlation of practice patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 433 non-cuffed CVCs, there were 393 removals out of which 80% were elective and 20% were premature. The median CVC survival was 37 days (95% CI: 35-41). The rate of premature CVC removal was 4.5/1000 CVC-days (95% CI: 3.6-5.6). Mechanical complications followed by central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) were the most common reasons for premature removal. Rate of CLABSI was 1.7/1000 CVC-days (95% CI: 1.2-2.5). Diabetic CKD significantly increased the hazard of premature CVC removal (HR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.01-3.63, <i>p</i> = 0.04) while right internal-jugular location decreased the hazard (HR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13-0.38, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonged retention of non-cuffed CVC (median 37 days) is common in resource-poor setting. It is worrisome and calls for pre-emptive access creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-cuffed central venous catheter for unplanned and urgent start haemodialysis in chronic kidney disease: A multi-centre experience from India.\",\"authors\":\"Subrahmanian Sathiavageesan, Balamurugan Swaminathan, Murugan Myvizhiselvi, Gopalakrishnan Ramakrishnan, Ramprasad Elumalai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298231191369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is indispensable to unplanned and urgent start haemodialysis in chronic kidney disease (CKD). While cuffed CVC is preferred to non-cuffed CVC for urgent start haemodialysis, patient's clinical condition might warrant immediate insertion of non-cuffed CVC. In the resource poor setting, non-cuffed CVCs might have to be retained longer than guideline recommended limit of 2 weeks. In this multi-centre retrospective observational study, the real-world survival of non-cuffed CVC was assessed among CKD patients who initiated dialysis urgently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CVC survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. Predictors of premature CVC loss were assessed using multi-level multi-variate Cox frailty model wherein, each centre was provided with a random intercept to account for within-centre correlation of practice patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 433 non-cuffed CVCs, there were 393 removals out of which 80% were elective and 20% were premature. The median CVC survival was 37 days (95% CI: 35-41). The rate of premature CVC removal was 4.5/1000 CVC-days (95% CI: 3.6-5.6). Mechanical complications followed by central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) were the most common reasons for premature removal. Rate of CLABSI was 1.7/1000 CVC-days (95% CI: 1.2-2.5). Diabetic CKD significantly increased the hazard of premature CVC removal (HR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.01-3.63, <i>p</i> = 0.04) while right internal-jugular location decreased the hazard (HR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13-0.38, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonged retention of non-cuffed CVC (median 37 days) is common in resource-poor setting. It is worrisome and calls for pre-emptive access creation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231191369\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231191369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中心静脉导管(CVC)是慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者意外和紧急开始血液透析时不可或缺的导管。在紧急开始血液透析时,带袖带的 CVC 比不带袖带的 CVC 更受青睐,但患者的临床状况可能需要立即插入不带袖带的 CVC。在资源匮乏的情况下,无袖带 CVC 的留置时间可能会超过指南建议的 2 周。在这项多中心回顾性观察研究中,我们评估了紧急开始透析的 CKD 患者无袖带 CVC 的实际存活率:方法:采用 Kaplan-Meier 存活率估算法评估 CVC 存活率。采用多层次多变量 Cox 脆弱性模型评估 CVC 过早脱落的预测因素,其中为每个中心提供一个随机截距,以考虑中心内实践模式的相关性:在 433 根无袖带的 CVC 中,有 393 根被移除,其中 80% 为选择性移除,20% 为过早移除。CVC 存活率中位数为 37 天(95% CI:35-41)。过早移除 CVC 的比例为 4.5/1000 CVC 天(95% CI:3.6-5.6)。机械并发症和中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)是最常见的过早移除原因。CLABSI发生率为1.7/1000个CVC日(95% CI:1.2-2.5)。糖尿病性慢性肾功能衰竭会显著增加过早拔除 CVC 的风险(HR 1.91,95% CI:1.01-3.63,p = 0.04),而右侧颈内静脉位置会降低风险(HR 0.22,95% CI:0.13-0.38,p 结论:CVC 拔除的风险与过早拔除的风险成正比:在资源匮乏的环境中,无袖带 CVC 的长期留置(中位 37 天)很常见。这种情况令人担忧,需要预先建立通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-cuffed central venous catheter for unplanned and urgent start haemodialysis in chronic kidney disease: A multi-centre experience from India.

Background: Central Venous Catheter (CVC) is indispensable to unplanned and urgent start haemodialysis in chronic kidney disease (CKD). While cuffed CVC is preferred to non-cuffed CVC for urgent start haemodialysis, patient's clinical condition might warrant immediate insertion of non-cuffed CVC. In the resource poor setting, non-cuffed CVCs might have to be retained longer than guideline recommended limit of 2 weeks. In this multi-centre retrospective observational study, the real-world survival of non-cuffed CVC was assessed among CKD patients who initiated dialysis urgently.

Methods: CVC survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimate. Predictors of premature CVC loss were assessed using multi-level multi-variate Cox frailty model wherein, each centre was provided with a random intercept to account for within-centre correlation of practice patterns.

Results: Among 433 non-cuffed CVCs, there were 393 removals out of which 80% were elective and 20% were premature. The median CVC survival was 37 days (95% CI: 35-41). The rate of premature CVC removal was 4.5/1000 CVC-days (95% CI: 3.6-5.6). Mechanical complications followed by central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) were the most common reasons for premature removal. Rate of CLABSI was 1.7/1000 CVC-days (95% CI: 1.2-2.5). Diabetic CKD significantly increased the hazard of premature CVC removal (HR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.01-3.63, p = 0.04) while right internal-jugular location decreased the hazard (HR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13-0.38, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Prolonged retention of non-cuffed CVC (median 37 days) is common in resource-poor setting. It is worrisome and calls for pre-emptive access creation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信