男孩对女孩结婚和辍学的看法:印度南部结构性干预措施的定性研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2023.2241525
Ashwini Pujar, Lottie Howard-Merrill, Ben Cislaghi, Kavitha Lokamanya, Ravi Prakash, Prakash Javalkar, Thalinja Raghavendra, Tara Beattie, Shajy Isac, Mitzy Gafos, Lori Heise, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Satyanarayana Ramanaik, Martine Collumbien
{"title":"男孩对女孩结婚和辍学的看法:印度南部结构性干预措施的定性研究。","authors":"Ashwini Pujar, Lottie Howard-Merrill, Ben Cislaghi, Kavitha Lokamanya, Ravi Prakash, Prakash Javalkar, Thalinja Raghavendra, Tara Beattie, Shajy Isac, Mitzy Gafos, Lori Heise, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Satyanarayana Ramanaik, Martine Collumbien","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2023.2241525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Girls' education has for many decades been central to the global development agenda, due to its positive impact on girls' health and wellbeing. In this paper, the authors revisit boys' attitudes, behaviours and norms related to girls' education, following the Samata intervention to prevent girls' school dropouts in Northern-Karnataka, South India. Data were collected from 20 boys in intervention villages before and after the intervention, and analysis was undertaken using a thematic-framework approach. Findings suggest that while boys did hold some attitudes and beliefs that supported girls' education and delayed-marriage, these remained within the framework of gender-inequitable norms concerning girls' marriageability, respectability/family-honour. Participants criticised peers who sought to jeopardise girls' respectability by teasing and community gossip about girls-boys' communication in public. Boys who rejected prevailing norms of masculinity were subjected to gossip, ridicule and violence by the community. Boys' attitudes and beliefs supported girls' education but were conditional on the maintenance of gendered hierarchies at household and interpersonal levels. Social norms concerning girls' honour, respectability and the role of boys as protectors/aggressors appeared to influence boys' response to girls' school dropouts. Future interventions aiming to address girls' education and marriage must invest time and resources to ensure that intervention components targeting boys are relevant, appropriate and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boys' perspectives on girls' marriage and school dropout: a qualitative study revisiting a structural intervention in Southern India.\",\"authors\":\"Ashwini Pujar, Lottie Howard-Merrill, Ben Cislaghi, Kavitha Lokamanya, Ravi Prakash, Prakash Javalkar, Thalinja Raghavendra, Tara Beattie, Shajy Isac, Mitzy Gafos, Lori Heise, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Satyanarayana Ramanaik, Martine Collumbien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2023.2241525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Girls' education has for many decades been central to the global development agenda, due to its positive impact on girls' health and wellbeing. In this paper, the authors revisit boys' attitudes, behaviours and norms related to girls' education, following the Samata intervention to prevent girls' school dropouts in Northern-Karnataka, South India. Data were collected from 20 boys in intervention villages before and after the intervention, and analysis was undertaken using a thematic-framework approach. Findings suggest that while boys did hold some attitudes and beliefs that supported girls' education and delayed-marriage, these remained within the framework of gender-inequitable norms concerning girls' marriageability, respectability/family-honour. Participants criticised peers who sought to jeopardise girls' respectability by teasing and community gossip about girls-boys' communication in public. Boys who rejected prevailing norms of masculinity were subjected to gossip, ridicule and violence by the community. Boys' attitudes and beliefs supported girls' education but were conditional on the maintenance of gendered hierarchies at household and interpersonal levels. Social norms concerning girls' honour, respectability and the role of boys as protectors/aggressors appeared to influence boys' response to girls' school dropouts. Future interventions aiming to address girls' education and marriage must invest time and resources to ensure that intervention components targeting boys are relevant, appropriate and effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2241525\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2241525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,女童教育一直是全球发展议程的核心,因为女童教育对女童的健康和福祉有着积极的影响。在本文中,作者重新审视了印度南部北卡纳塔克邦为防止女孩辍学而采取的 Samata 干预措施之后,男孩对女孩教育的态度、行为和规范。我们收集了干预前后干预村庄中 20 名男孩的数据,并采用主题框架法进行了分析。研究结果表明,虽然男孩们确实持有一些支持女孩接受教育和推迟结婚的态度和信念,但这些态度和信念仍然是在关于女孩的可结婚性、受尊重程度/家庭荣誉的性别不公平规范框架内。参与者批评那些试图通过取笑和社区中关于男女生在公共场合交流的流言蜚语来损害女孩受尊重程度的同龄人。拒绝接受主流男子气概规范的男孩会受到社区的流言蜚语、嘲笑和暴力。男孩的态度和信念支持女孩接受教育,但条件是在家庭和人际交往中维持性别等级制度。有关女孩荣誉、受尊重程度以及男孩作为保护者/攻击者角色的社会规范似乎影响了男孩对女孩辍学的反应。未来旨在解决女童教育和婚姻问题的干预措施必须投入时间和资源,以确保针对男童的干预措施是相关、适当和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boys' perspectives on girls' marriage and school dropout: a qualitative study revisiting a structural intervention in Southern India.

Girls' education has for many decades been central to the global development agenda, due to its positive impact on girls' health and wellbeing. In this paper, the authors revisit boys' attitudes, behaviours and norms related to girls' education, following the Samata intervention to prevent girls' school dropouts in Northern-Karnataka, South India. Data were collected from 20 boys in intervention villages before and after the intervention, and analysis was undertaken using a thematic-framework approach. Findings suggest that while boys did hold some attitudes and beliefs that supported girls' education and delayed-marriage, these remained within the framework of gender-inequitable norms concerning girls' marriageability, respectability/family-honour. Participants criticised peers who sought to jeopardise girls' respectability by teasing and community gossip about girls-boys' communication in public. Boys who rejected prevailing norms of masculinity were subjected to gossip, ridicule and violence by the community. Boys' attitudes and beliefs supported girls' education but were conditional on the maintenance of gendered hierarchies at household and interpersonal levels. Social norms concerning girls' honour, respectability and the role of boys as protectors/aggressors appeared to influence boys' response to girls' school dropouts. Future interventions aiming to address girls' education and marriage must invest time and resources to ensure that intervention components targeting boys are relevant, appropriate and effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信