脊髓损伤 1 年后户外行走预测:一项回顾性、多站点外部验证研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000428
Christina Draganich, Kenneth A Weber, Wesley A Thornton, Jeffrey C Berliner, Mitch Sevigny, Susan Charlifue, Candace Tefertiller, Andrew C Smith
{"title":"脊髓损伤 1 年后户外行走预测:一项回顾性、多站点外部验证研究。","authors":"Christina Draganich, Kenneth A Weber, Wesley A Thornton, Jeffrey C Berliner, Mitch Sevigny, Susan Charlifue, Candace Tefertiller, Andrew C Smith","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Predicting future outdoor walking ability after spinal cord injury (SCI) is important, as this is associated with community engagement and social participation. A clinical prediction rule (CPR) was derived for predicting outdoor walking 1 year after SCI. While promising, this CPR has not been validated, which is necessary to establish its clinical value. The objective of this study was to externally validate the CPR using a multisite dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of US SCI Model Systems data from 12 centers. L3 motor score, L5 motor score, and S1 sensory score were used as predictor variables. The dataset was split into testing and training datasets. The testing dataset was used as a holdout dataset to provide an unbiased estimate of prediction performance. The training dataset was used to determine the optimal CPR threshold through a \"leave-one-site-out\" cross-validation framework. The primary outcome was self-reported outdoor walking ability 1 year after SCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3721 participants' data were included. Using the optimal CPR threshold (CPR ≥ 33 threshold value), we were able to predict outdoor walking 1 year with high cross-validated accuracy and prediction performance. For the entire dataset, area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.900 (95% confidence interval: 0.890-0.910; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The outdoor walking CPR has been externally validated. Future research should conduct a clinical outcomes and cost-benefit impact analysis for implementing this CPR. Our results support that clinicians may use this 3-variable CPR for prediction of future outdoor walking ability.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A411 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Outdoor Walking 1 Year After Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective, Multisite External Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Draganich, Kenneth A Weber, Wesley A Thornton, Jeffrey C Berliner, Mitch Sevigny, Susan Charlifue, Candace Tefertiller, Andrew C Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Predicting future outdoor walking ability after spinal cord injury (SCI) is important, as this is associated with community engagement and social participation. A clinical prediction rule (CPR) was derived for predicting outdoor walking 1 year after SCI. While promising, this CPR has not been validated, which is necessary to establish its clinical value. The objective of this study was to externally validate the CPR using a multisite dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of US SCI Model Systems data from 12 centers. L3 motor score, L5 motor score, and S1 sensory score were used as predictor variables. The dataset was split into testing and training datasets. The testing dataset was used as a holdout dataset to provide an unbiased estimate of prediction performance. The training dataset was used to determine the optimal CPR threshold through a \\\"leave-one-site-out\\\" cross-validation framework. The primary outcome was self-reported outdoor walking ability 1 year after SCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3721 participants' data were included. Using the optimal CPR threshold (CPR ≥ 33 threshold value), we were able to predict outdoor walking 1 year with high cross-validated accuracy and prediction performance. For the entire dataset, area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.900 (95% confidence interval: 0.890-0.910; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The outdoor walking CPR has been externally validated. Future research should conduct a clinical outcomes and cost-benefit impact analysis for implementing this CPR. Our results support that clinicians may use this 3-variable CPR for prediction of future outdoor walking ability.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A411 ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:预测脊髓损伤(SCI)后未来的户外行走能力非常重要,因为这与社区参与和社会参与有关。一项临床预测规则(CPR)用于预测脊髓损伤后 1 年的户外行走能力。尽管该预测规则前景广阔,但尚未经过验证,而验证是确定其临床价值所必需的。本研究的目的是利用多站点数据集对 CPR 进行外部验证:这是一项对来自 12 个中心的美国 SCI 模型系统数据的回顾性分析。L3 运动评分、L5 运动评分和 S1 感觉评分被用作预测变量。数据集分为测试数据集和训练数据集。测试数据集用作保留数据集,以便对预测性能进行无偏估计。训练数据集用于通过 "留一弃一 "交叉验证框架确定最佳心肺复苏阈值。主要结果是 SCI 1 年后自我报告的户外行走能力:结果:共纳入 3721 名参与者的数据。使用最佳CPR阈值(CPR≥33阈值),我们能够预测1年后的户外行走能力,交叉验证的准确率和预测性能都很高。在整个数据集中,接收器运算特征曲线下面积为 0.900(95% 置信区间:0.890-0.910;P < 0.0001):室外步行心肺复苏术已通过外部验证。未来的研究应就实施该心肺复苏术进行临床结果和成本效益影响分析。我们的研究结果表明,临床医生可使用该 3 变量 CPR 预测未来的户外行走能力。视频摘要可获得作者的更多见解(请参阅视频,补充数字内容 1,网址:http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A411 )。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Outdoor Walking 1 Year After Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective, Multisite External Validation Study.

Background and purpose: Predicting future outdoor walking ability after spinal cord injury (SCI) is important, as this is associated with community engagement and social participation. A clinical prediction rule (CPR) was derived for predicting outdoor walking 1 year after SCI. While promising, this CPR has not been validated, which is necessary to establish its clinical value. The objective of this study was to externally validate the CPR using a multisite dataset.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of US SCI Model Systems data from 12 centers. L3 motor score, L5 motor score, and S1 sensory score were used as predictor variables. The dataset was split into testing and training datasets. The testing dataset was used as a holdout dataset to provide an unbiased estimate of prediction performance. The training dataset was used to determine the optimal CPR threshold through a "leave-one-site-out" cross-validation framework. The primary outcome was self-reported outdoor walking ability 1 year after SCI.

Results: A total of 3721 participants' data were included. Using the optimal CPR threshold (CPR ≥ 33 threshold value), we were able to predict outdoor walking 1 year with high cross-validated accuracy and prediction performance. For the entire dataset, area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.900 (95% confidence interval: 0.890-0.910; P < 0.0001).

Discussion and conclusions: The outdoor walking CPR has been externally validated. Future research should conduct a clinical outcomes and cost-benefit impact analysis for implementing this CPR. Our results support that clinicians may use this 3-variable CPR for prediction of future outdoor walking ability.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A411 ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信